Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2

Model Proposal Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Customers’ Demands for Mortgage

Müşterilerin İpotekli Konut Kredisi Taleplerini Nicel Değerlendirme Modeli Önerisi

Pages
31–47
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this purpose, the points of weightiness on criteria which affect customers’ credit score, were firstly determined by using Analytic Hierarchy Process, and then the model was tested by calculating the credit score of customers with different characteristic.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:People who want to become the owner of house but meet some financial difficulties, demand for credit from banks.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Banks that make a decision about acceptance or rejection of these demands should consider all effective factors in credit evaluation process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this purpose, the points of weightiness on criteria which affect customers’ credit score, were firstly determined by using Analytic Hierarchy Process, and then the model was tested by calculating the credit score of customers with different characteristic.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

People who want to become the owner of house but meet some financial difficulties, demand for credit from banks. Banks that make a decision about acceptance or rejection of these demands should consider all effective factors in credit evaluation process. In this study, a new proposal of model was improved to evaluate the customers which demand for mortgage. For this purpose, the points of weightiness on criteria which affect customers’ credit score, were firstly determined by using Analytic Hierarchy Process, and then the model was tested by calculating the credit score of customers with different characteristic.

Özet

Konut sahibi olmak isteyen fakat finansal açıdan birtakım güçlüklerle karşılaşan kişiler, bankalardan kredi talebinde bulunmaktadır. Bu taleplere kabul veya red kararı veren bankalar, kredi değerlendirme sürecinde etkili olan tüm faktörleri göz önünde bulundurmalıdır. Bu çalışmada ipotekli konut kredisi talebinde bulunan müşterileri değerlendirmek için yeni bir model önerisi geliştirilmiştir. Bu amaçla öncelikle Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci yöntemi kullanılarak müşterilerin kredi puanını etkileyen kriterlerin ağırlıklı puanları belirlenmiş; ardından farklı karakteristikteki müşterilerin kredi puanı hesaplanarak model test edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, N., MURAT, G. (2007). Model Proposal Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Customers’ Demands for Mortgage. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 1 - Sayı: 2, 31–47. https://ajindex.com/articles/149370

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aguaron, J., Escobar, M.T. ve Moreno-Jimenez, J.M. (2003). Consistency Stability Intervals for a Judgement in AHP Decision Support Systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(2): 382-393
  2. Alford, B.D. ve Golden, B. (2004). Two Applications Involving The Analytic Hierarchy Process. MSc Thesis, University of Maryland
  3. Anatoliamortgage, (2007a) Mortgage Nasıl Oluşuyor?, www.anatoliamortgage. net/indexm. html
  4. Anatoliamortgage, (2007b) Kredi Skoru, www.anatoliamortgage.net/indexm. html
  5. Armacost, R.L., Componation, P.J., Mullens, M.A. ve Swart, W.W. (1994). An AHP Framework for Prioritizing Customer Requirements in QFD: An Industrialized Housing Application. IIE Transactions, 26(4): 72-79
  6. Bodin, L. ve Gass, S.I. (2004). Exercises for Teaching the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Informs Transactions on Education, 4(2), www.ite.pubs. informs.org/Vol4No2/ BodinGass/
  7. Cinemre, K. (2004). Konut Finansmanı ve Türkiye. Garanti Bankası, Türkiye
  8. Çam, H. ve Toraman, A. (2003). Hazar Petrollerinin Pazar Stratejisi ve AHY Esaslı Alternatif Güzergah Değerlendirme Modeli. İTÜ Dergisi, 2(6): 41-46
  9. Çelebi, Ö. (2004). Birincil Konut Kredisi Piyasasında Son Gelişmeler ve Yaşanan Sıkıntılar. Türkiye İş Bankası A.Ş, Türkiye
  10. Dağdeviren, M., Akay, D. ve Kurt, M. (2004). İş Değerlendirme Sürecinde Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci ve Uygulaması. Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Dergisi, 19(2):131-138
  11. Dyer, R.F. ve Forman, E.H. (1992). Group Decision Support with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Decision Support Systems, 8(2): 99-124
  12. Evren, R. ve Ülengin, F. (1992). Yönetimde Çok Amaçlı Karar Verme. İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Yayını, Sayı: 1478
  13. Forgionne, G.A., Kohli, R. ve Jennings, D. (2002). An AHP Analysis of Quality in AI and DSS Journals. Omega, 30(3): 171-183
  14. Hemaida, R.S. ve Kalb, E. (2001). Using The Analytic Hierarchy Process For The Selection of First-Year Family Practice Residents. Hospital Topics: Research And Perspectives on Healthcare, 79(1): 11-15
  15. İç, Y.T. ve Yurdakul, M. (2000). Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci (AHS) Yöntemini Kullanan Bir Kredi Değerlendirme Sistemi. Gazi Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Dergisi, 25(1): 1-14
  16. Kredipazarı, (2007a) Mortgage Avantaj ve Dezavantajları, www.kredipazari. com/public/bilgi/mortgageavantaj.php
  17. Kredipazarı, (2007b) Kredi Notu Nedir?, www.kredipazari.com/public/bilgi/ kredinotunedir.php#
  18. Kredipazarı, (2007c) Mortgage Baflvurusunda Hangi fiartlar Aranır?, http://www. kr