SavedAdd your journal

Journals / International Archives of Medical Research / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Water Immersion: An Effective Method to Shorten the First and Second Stages of Labor.

Gul Nihal Buyuk(ANKARA DR. ZEKAİ TAHİR BURAK HEALTH RESEARCH CENTER FOR WOMEN'S HEALTH)0000-0003-4405-2876
Zeynep Asli Oskovi Kaplan(ANKARA DR. ZEKAİ TAHİR BURAK KADIN SAĞLIĞI SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)0000-0001-7554-4393
Melis Ece Men(ANKARA DR. ZEKAİ TAHİR BURAK KADIN SAĞLIĞI SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)
Serkan Kahyaogiu(ANKARA DR. ZEKAİ TAHİR BURAK KADIN SAĞLIĞI SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)
Yaprak Üstün(ANKARA DR. ZEKAİ TAHİR BURAK KADIN SAĞLIĞI SAĞLIK UYGULAMA VE ARAŞTIRMA MERKEZİ)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-06-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Water immersion during labor in terms of reduction in first and second stage of labor and not cause an increased risk of adverse effects to the fetus/newborn.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Birth in water; It is an alternative form of birth where the first stage of birth and / or the second stage is performed in a pool filled with warm water at 37 degrees.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: The study groups consisted of 104 women undergoing vaginal delivery with immersion in water during labor (group 1) and the control group (group 2) of 104 women undergoing vaginal delivery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Water immersion during labor in terms of reduction in first and second stage of labor and not cause an increased risk of adverse effects to the fetus/newborn.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Labor stages · vaginal delivery · water birth

Abstract

Background: Birth in water; It is an alternative form of birth where the first stage of birth and / or the second stage is performed in a pool filled with warm water at 37 degrees. Our aim is to investigate the effect of immersion in water during labor which is a method that we often apply recently on the birth stages. Methods: The study groups consisted of 104 women undergoing vaginal delivery with immersion in water during labor (group 1) and the control group (group 2) of 104 women undergoing vaginal delivery. All data were taken from patients who have delivered with spontaneous vaginal delivery. The time from the beginning of the active phase to the 10 cm cervical dilatation and the time from the full dilatation to the expulsion of the baby were recorded. First and second stage times have been evaluated. Results: The study groups consisted of 104 women undergoing vaginal delivery with immersion in water during labor (Group 1) and the control group (Group 2) of 104 women undergoing vaginal delivery at the hospital. The women in the two groups were matched with respect to age, parite, birth weight and gestational age . The mean first stage time of labor in the first group was 5.50±1.51 hours and in the second group was 6.08±1.58 hours. The mean second stage time of labor in the first group was 24.4±11.6 minutes and in the second group was 29.7±14.5 minutes. Conclusion: Water immersion during labor in terms of reduction in first and second stage of labor and not cause an increased risk of adverse effects to the fetus/newborn.

🔖

Cite This Article

Buyuk, G. N., Kaplan, Z. A. O., Men, M. E., Kahyaogiu, S., Üstün, Y. (2020). Water Immersion: An Effective Method to Shorten the First and Second Stages of Labor.. International Archives of Medical Research, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1493198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Richmond H. Women's experiences of waterbirth. Practising Midwife 2003;6(3):26‐31.
  2. Ohlsson G, Buchhave P, Leandersson U, Nordstrom L, Rydhstrom H, Sjolin I. Warm tub bathing during labor: maternal and neonatal effects. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2001;80:311‐4.
  3. Liu Y, Liu Y, Huang X, Du C, Peng J, Huang P, Zhang J. A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 May 6;14:160-4
  4. Rosenthal MJ. Warm‐water immersion in labor and birth. The Female Patient 1991;16:33‐77.
  5. Ladfors L, Mattsson I, Eriksson M. Early or late tub bath during the first stage of labor: a randomized study of 200 women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S141.
  6. Cluett ER, Pickering RM, Getliffe G, Saunders NJSG. Randomised controlled trial of labouring in water compared with standard of augmentation for the management of dystocia in first stage of labour. BMJ 2004;328(7435):314‐20.
  7. Benfield RD, Herman J, Katz VL, Wilson SP, Davis JM. Hydrotherapy in labor. Research in Nursing and Health 2001;24:57‐67.
  8. Geissbuehler V, Eberhard J. Waterbirths a comparative study. A prospective study on more than 2000 waterbirths. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy 2000;15(5):291‐300.
  9. Geissbuehler V., Stein S., Eberhard J. Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years. J Perinat Med. 32 (4): 2004; 308–314
  10. Bhutta Z.A., Darmstadt G.L., Haws R.A., Yakoob M.Y., Lawn J.E. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 9 (Suppl. 1): 2009; S7
  11. Gupta J., Hofmeyr G. Position for women during second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (1): 2004; CD002006
  12. Mayberry L.J., Wood S.H., Strange L.B., Lee L., Heisler D.R., Nielsen‐Smith K. Second‐stage labor management: Promotion of evidence‐based practice and a collaborative approach to patient care. 2000; Association of Women's Health Obstetric and Neonatal nurses (AWHONN): Washington, DC
  13. Young Duck Shin,Sang Hi Park, Hyeon Tae Kim, Chan Jin Park,Jin Hee Lee, and Young Jin Choi. The effect of anaesthesia technique on caesarean section. Pak J Med Sci. 2016 Jan-Feb; 32(1): 147–150.
  14. Bloom S.L., Casey B.M., Schaffer J.I., McIntire D.D., Leveno K.J. A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 194 (1): 2006; 10–13
  15. Janni W., Schiessl B., Peschers U., Huber S., Strobl B., Hantschmann P., et al. The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 81 (3): 2002; 214–221
  16. Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, Jordan S, Lavender T, Neilson JP. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;3 CD009234.
  17. Burke E, Kilfoyle A. A comparative study, waterbirth and bed birth. Midwives. 1995;108:3–7.
  18. Cammu H, Clasen K, Wettere L, Derde M-P. To bathe or not to bathe during the first stage of labor. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1994;73:468–72.
  19. Schorn MN, McAllister JL, Blanco JD. Water immersion and the effect on labor. J Nurse Midwifery. 1993;38:336–42.
  20. Geissbuehler V., Stein S., Eberhard J. Waterbirths compared with landbirths: an observational study of nine years. J Perinat Med. 32 (4): 2004; 308–314
  21. Bhutta Z.A., Darmstadt G.L., Haws R.A., Yakoob M.Y., Lawn J.E. Delivering interventions to reduce the global burden of stillbirths: improving service supply and community demand. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 9 (Suppl. 1): 2009; S7
  22. Gupta J., Hofmeyr G. Position for women during second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (1): 2004; CD002006
  23. Mayberry L.J., Wood S.H., Strange L.B., Lee L., Heisler D.R., Nielsen‐Smith K. Second‐stage labor management: Promotion of evidence‐based practice and a collaborative approach to patient care. 2000; Association of Women's Health Obstetric and Neonatal nurses (AWHONN): Washington, DC
  24. Bloom S.L., Casey B.M., Schaffer J.I., McIntire D.D., Leveno K.J. A randomized trial of coached versus uncoached maternal pushing during the second stage of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 194 (1): 2006; 10–13