SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Herkes için Spor ve Rekreasyon Dergisi / 2024 / Volume: 6 Issue: 4

The Relationship Between Stress Tolerance, Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Temperament Types: Pre-Service Teachers Example

Stres Toleransı, Bilişsel Duygu Düzenleme ve Mizaç Tipleri Arasındaki İlişki: Öğretmen Adayı Örneği

Lale Yıldız Çakır(MUĞLA SITKI KOÇMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1283-4788
Ferudun Dorak(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2586-0499
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The qualitative findings of the current study support the quantitative findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current study employing the mixed design to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the relationship between pre-service physical education teachers’ temperament types, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and stress tolerance level aims to contribute to the features loaded onto the “quality teacher” concept.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study's sampling is comprised of 92 females and 167 males, a total of 259, pre-service physical education teachers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The qualitative findings of the current study support the quantitative findings.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Emotion · stress tolerance · temperament

Abstract

The current study employing the mixed design to qualitatively and quantitatively investigate the relationship between pre-service physical education teachers’ temperament types, cognitive emotion regulation strategies, and stress tolerance level aims to contribute to the features loaded onto the “quality teacher” concept. In determining the participants, a convenience sampling method, one of the non-random sampling methods was used. The study's sampling is comprised of 92 females and 167 males, a total of 259, pre-service physical education teachers. The participants were administered a questionnaire made up of the scales of the Stress Tolerance Test in the Vienna Test System (DT-test), Cognitive Emotion Regulation, and the Nine Temperaments Model (DTMM). The qualitative data were collected by recording the participating pre-service teachers’ responses to the semi-structured open-ended questions. While quantitative data were analyzed with the SPSS 24 package program, qualitative data were written down, defined according to certain phenomena, and interpreted with the analysis in the depth and richness of the data. The temperament types of the students were found to lead to significant differences in the sub-dimensions of cognitive emotion regulation and the stress tolerance correct reaction time median values. The qualitative findings of the current study support the quantitative findings.

Özet

Beden eğitimi öğretmen adaylarının mizaç modelleri, bilişsel duygu düzenleme stratejileri ve stres tolerans düzeylerini nicel ve nitel fazda inceleyen karma desendeki bu çalışmada “nitelikli öğretmen” kavramına yüklenen özelliklere katkı sağlamak amaçlanmıştır. Katılımcıların belirlenmesinde, seçkisiz olmayan örnekleme yöntemlerinden uygun örneklem yöntemi kullanılmıştır. 92 kadın (%35.5) 167 erkek (%64.5) olmak üzere toplam 259 beden eğitimi öğretmen adayı (22.74±3.47) çalışmanın örneklemini oluşmaktadır. Katılımcılara, Viyana Test Sisteminin Stres Tolerans (DT-test) testi, Bilişsel Duygu Düzenleme ve Dokuz Tip Mizaç Modeli (DTMM) ölçeklerini içeren anket formu uygulatılmıştır. Nitel veriler, yarı yapılandırılmış açık uçlu sorulara verilen cevapların ses kayıt cihazına kaydedilmesi ile toplanmıştır. Katılımcıların mizaç tipi durumuna göre bilişsel duygu düzenleme alt boyutlarına ilişkin karşılaştırmalar incelendiğinde, istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar saptanmıştır. Mizaç tipi durumu dikkate alındığında, stres toleransı doğru reaksiyon zaman medyanı değerlerinde istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar bulunmuştur. Çalışmada elde edilen nitel bulgular nicel bulguları destekler niteliktedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çakır, L. Y., Dorak, F. (2024). The Relationship Between Stress Tolerance, Cognitive Emotion Regulation and Temperament Types: Pre-Service Teachers Example. Herkes için Spor ve Rekreasyon Dergisi, Volume: 6 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1562558

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Alpar, R. (2020). Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistiksel Yöntemler, Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  2. Aycan, K. (2017). Dokuz tip mizaç modeli ile aktif müzik eğitimi uygulamalarının ilişkisi, Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty (GUJGEF), 37(3), 911-938.
  3. Bonanno, G.A & Burton, C.L. (2013). Regulatory Flexibility: An Individual Differences Perspective on Coping and Emotion Regulation, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591–612. https://doi.10.1177/1745691613504116
  4. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  5. Calkins, S.D. (1994). Origins and outcomes of individual differences in emotion regulation, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59(2-3), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166138
  6. Carol, R. Rodgers & Miriam, B. Raider‐Roth (2006) Presence in teaching, Teachers and Teaching, 12(3), 265-287. https://doi.10.1080/13450600500467548
  7. Casalin, S., Tang, E., Vliegen, N. & Luyten, P. (2014). Parental personality, stress generation, and ınfant temperament in emergent parent-child relationships: evidence for a moderated mediation model, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 33(3), 270-291. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2014.33.3.270
  8. Corno, L. & Anderma M.E. (2016). Handbook of Educational Psychology, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 3.Edition, London.
  9. Çelik, H. & Kocabıyık Onat, O. (2014). Genç yetişkinlerin saldırganlık ifade biçimlerinin cinsiyet ve bilişsel duygu düzenleme tarzları bağlamında incelenmesi, Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 139-155.
  10. Eisenberg, N., Valiente, C., Spinrad, T.L., Cumberland, A., Liew, J., Reiser, M. et al. (2009). Longitudinal relations of children’s effortful control, impulsivity, and negative emotionality to their externalizing, internalizing, and co-occurring behavior problems, Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 988–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016213
  11. Furley, P. & Memmert, D. (2010). Differences in spatial working memory as a function of team sports expertise: the corsi block-tapping task in sport psychological assessment, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 110(3), 801-808. https://doi.org/10.2466/PMS.110.3.801-808
  12. Garnefski, N. & Kraaij V. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation quesstionnaire: Psychometric features and prospective relationships with depression and anxiety in adults, European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141
  13. Garnefski, N. & Kraaij, V. (2006). Relationships between cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: A Comparative Study of Five Specific Samples, Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 1659–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.009
  14. Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V. & Spinhoven P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 1311-1327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
  15. Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V. & Spinhoven, P. (2002). Manual for the use of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. The Netherlands: DATEC, Leiderdorp.
  16. Garnefski, N., Teerds, J., Kraaij, V., Legerstee, J. & Van Der Kommer T. (2004). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies and depressive symptoms: differences between males and females. Personality and İndividual Differences, 36(2), 267-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00083-7
  17. Gierczuk, D., Bujak, Z., Rowinski, J. & Dmitriyev, A. (2012). Selected coordination motor abilities in elite wrestlers and taekwon-do competitors, Polish Journal Sport Tourism, 19, 230-239.
  18. Gratz, K.L. & Roomer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and inital validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale, Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94
  19. Gross, J.J. & Thompson, R.A. (2007). Emotion Regulation: Conceptual Foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press. 3-24.
  20. http://psychologischtesten.nl/vienna-test-system/
  21. Kopala-Sibley, D.C., Olino, T., Durbin, E., Dyson, M.W. & Klein, D.N. (2018). The stability of temperament from early childhood to early adolescence: A multi-method, multi-informant examination, European journal of personality, 32(2), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2151
  22. Koschmieder, C. & Neubauer, A. (2021); Measuring emotion regulation for preservice teacher selection: A theory-driven development of a situational judgment test, Personality and Individual Differences, 168, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110363
  23. Krassner, A.M., Garstein, M.A, Park, C., Dragan, W.L., Lecannelier, F. & Putnam, S.P. (2017). East-west, collectivist-individualist: A cross-cultural examination of temperament in toddlers from Chile, Poland, South Korea, and the U.S., European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(4), 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2016.1236722
  24. Menges, C. (2016). Toward improving the effectiveness of formal mentoring programs: matching by personality matters, Group & Organization Management, 41(1), 98-129.https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115579567
  25. Morrish, L., Rickard, N., Chin, T. C., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2018). Emotion regulation in adolescent well-being and positive education, Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(5), 1543-1564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9881-y
  26. Nunnally, J.C. (1978). An overview of psychological measurement. Clinical diagnosis of mental disorders, 97-146.
  27. Onat, O. & Otrar, M. (2010). Bilişsel duygu düzenleme ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları, M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 31, 123–143.
  28. Özdamar, K. (1999). Paket programlar ile istatiksel veri analizi. Kaan Kitabevi, Eskişehir.
  29. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inguiry, Qualilative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325002001003636
  30. Rasmussen, M.D. (2015). Do patients with personality disorders respond differentially to electroconvulsive therapy? A review of the literature and consideration of conceptual issues. The Journal of ECT (electroconvulsive therapy), 31(1), 6-12. doi. 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000165
  31. Rugancı, R.N. & Gençöz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of a turkish version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 442-455. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20665
  32. Sakakibara, R. & Endo, T. (2016). Cognitive Appraisal as a Predictor of Cognitive Emotion Regulation Choice. Japanese Psychological Research, 58(2), 175-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpr.12098
  33. Selçuk, Z. & Yılmaz, E.D. (2015). Dokuz Tip Mizaç Modeline Göre Rehberlik Yaklaşımına Giriş. Pegem Akademi, Ankara.
  34. Shao, A.T. (2002). Marketing Research: An Aid to Decision Making. U.S.A: Thomson-Southwestern.
  35. Stifter, C.A., Dollar, J.M., & Cipriano, E.A. (2011). Temperament and emotion regulation: The role of autonomic nervous system reactivity, Developmental psychobiology, 53(3), 266-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.20519
  36. Stolarski, M., Wojciechowski, J. & Matthews, G. (2021). Seeking the origins of time perspectives – Intelligence, temperament, or family environment? A one-year longitudinal study, Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110080
  37. Taxer, J.L. & Gross, J. (2018). Emotion regulation in teachers: The “why” and “how”, Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 180-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.05.008
  38. Tuckman, B.W. (1999). Conducting educational research. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, New York.
  39. Uludağ Uyanıker S. S. (2020). Sporda Psikolojik ve Sosyal Boyutlar (Seçme Konular) (ed. H.Şahan, İ.Adiloğulları). Zihinsel Antrenman İmgeleme Uygulamaları. Duvar Yayınları
  40. Weinberg, R. & Gould, D. (Edit: Şahin, M. & Koruç, Z.) (2014). Spor ve egzersiz psikolojisinin temelleri. 6.basım. Nobel Yayın, Ankara.
  41. Yılmaz, D.E, Gençer, G.A, Ünal, Ö. & Aydemir, Ö. (2014a). From Enneagram to Nine Types Temperament Model: A Proposal, Education and Science, 39(173), 393-423.
  42. Yılmaz, E. D., Gençer, A. G., Aydemir, Ö., Yılmaz, A., Kesebir, S., Ünal, Ö., Bilici, M. (2014b). Validity and reliability of Nine Types Temperament Scale, Education and Science, 39(171), 115-137.
  43. Yurdakul, B. (2008). Contribution of Constructivist Learning Approach to Constructing Knowledge in Socio-Cognitive Context, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(20), 39-67.
  44. Zlomke, K.R., & Hahn, K.S. (2010). Cognitive emotion regulation strategies: Gender differences and associations to worry, Personality and Individual Differences, 48(4), 408-413.
  45. Yılmaz, E. D., Gençer, A. G., Aydemir, Ö., Yılmaz, A., Kesebir, S., Ünal, Ö., Bilici, M. (2014b). Validity and reliability of Nine Types Temperament Scale, Education and Science, 39(171), 115-137.