SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Herkes için Spor ve Rekreasyon Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 2

Investigation of Self-Efficacy Levels of Different Sports Branch Referees

Murat Kangalgil(DOKUZ EYLUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7480-199X
Ebru Aydın0000-0002-2158-6501
Ensar Nihat Yüksel(YALOVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SPOR BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ, SPOR YÖNETİCİLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0009-0005-5922-4783
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result, it was found that male refer-ees had higher scores in the game knowledge sub-dimension in terms of the gender varia-ble.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to examine the self-efficacy levels of referees from diffrent sports branches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study sample consisted of 309 referees who were actively working in İzmir during the 2021–2022 season and were selected through a simple random sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result, it was found that male refer-ees had higher scores in the game knowledge sub-dimension in terms of the gender varia-ble.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2021–2022 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Different Sport Branch · Referee · Self-Efficacy

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the self-efficacy levels of referees from diffrent sports branches. The study sample consisted of 309 referees who were actively working in İzmir during the 2021–2022 season and were selected through a simple random sampling method. Data were collected using a “Personal Information Form” and the “Referee Self-Efficacy Scale.” The personal information form gathered demographic details such as gender, age, sport discipline, and refereeing experience. The “Referee Self-Efficacy Scale,” developed by Karaçam and Pulur (2017), is a 5-point Likert-type instrument comprising 18 items and five sub-dimensions. As the data were found to be normally distributed, in-dependent samples t-tests were conducted to analyze the variables of gender, sport disci-pline, and refereeing experience, while one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the age and education level variables. As a result, it was found that male refer-ees had higher scores in the game knowledge sub-dimension in terms of the gender varia-ble. In terms of age, the 18–24 and 25–34 age groups scored higher than the 35–44 age group in the physical competence and game knowledge sub-dimensions. Additionally, the 25–34 age group scored higher than the 35–44 age group in the decision-making and communication sub-dimension, and higher than the 18–24 age group in the pressure sub-dimension. While no significant difference was observed between different sports branches, self-efficacy scores were generally high across all branches. Regarding referee-ing experience, referees with more years of experience scored higher in the pressure sub-dimension compared to those with fewer years of experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kangalgil, M., Aydın, E., Yüksel, E. N. (2025). Investigation of Self-Efficacy Levels of Different Sports Branch Referees. Herkes için Spor ve Rekreasyon Dergisi, Volume: 7 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1670322

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Adıgüzel, N. S. (2018). Basketbol hakemlerinin fiziksel öz saygıları ile öz yeterlilikleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Ulusal Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.30769/usbd.482410
  2. Arı, A., & Erdem, T. (2022). Examining the self-efficacy levels of wrestling referees. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 24(3), 264–270. https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.1192418
  3. Atıcı, A. R. (2024). Masa tenisi hakemlerinin hakemlik mesleğini sürdürme ve öz yeterliklerinin belirlenmesi. Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 18(3), 391–403. https://doi.org/10.61962/bsd.1529071
  4. Aygün, M., & Murathan, T. (2023). Analysis of the self-efficacy of ice hockey referees. Sport Tk-Revista EuroAmericana de Ciencias del Deporte, 16(1), 14–14. https://doi.org/10.6018/sportk.534091
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control (4th ed.). W. H. Freeman. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Yayıncılık.
  6. Dereceli, Ç., Toros, T., & Yıldız, R. (2019). Futbol hakemlerinin durumluk kaygı ve genel öz yeterlik düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.530152
  7. Diotaiuti, P., Falese, L., Mancone, S., & Purromuto, F. (2017). A structural model of self-efficacy in handball referees. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 811. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00811
  8. Diotaiuti, P., Falese, L., Mancone, S., Corrado, S., Mallia, L., Zelli, A., & Lucidi, F. (2020). Psychometric properties and reliability of the referee self-efficacy scale (REFS) in volleyball referees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228423
  9. Ekmekçi, N., Zekioğlu, A., & Dal, N. (2021). Voleybol hakemlerinin ego ve görev yönelimleri bakımından öz yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. Humanistic Perspective, 3(1), 244–269. https://doi.org/10.47793/hp.838096
  10. Eskiyecek, C. G., Satici, O., Ozaltas, H. N., Savucu, Y., & Gul, M. (2019). An analysis on general self-efficacy beliefs of swimming referees in terms of demographic variables. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(5), 259–266. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n5p259
  11. Giel, T., & Breuer, C. (2020). The determinants of the intention to continue voluntary football refereeing. Sport Management Review, 23(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2019.01.005
  12. Guillén, F., & Feltz, D. L. (2011). A conceptual model of referee efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 25. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00025
  13. Karacam, A., & Adiguzel, N. S. (2019). Examining the relationship between referee performance and self-efficacy. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 377–382. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.1.377
  14. Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2017). Examining the relationship between referee self-efficacy and general self-efficacy levels of basketball referees in terms of certain variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(8), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i8.2450
  15. Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2017). Hakem öz yeterlik ölçeğinin (HÖYÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 118–128.
  16. Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2016). Identification of the relation between active basketball classification referees' empathetic tendencies and their problem-solving abilities. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1912–1917. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040822
  17. Karafil, A. Y., & Akgül, M. H. (2021). Investigation on self-efficacy on job satisfaction of soccer referees. Kinesiologia Slovenica, 27(3), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.27.3.70-82
  18. Karagöz, Y. (2021). SPSS ve AMOS uygulamalı nicel-nitel-karma bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri ve yayın etiği. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  19. Koçak, Ç. V. (2019). Voleybol hakemlerinin hakem öz yeterlik düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Spormetre Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.552892
  20. Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: Multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 139(5), 439–457. https://doi.org/10.3200/JRLP.139.5.439-457
  21. Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Guillén, F., & Dithurbide, L. (2012). Development of, and initial validity evidence for, the referee self-efficacy scale: A multistudy report. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(6), 737–765. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.6.737
  22. Nazarudin, M. N., Omar-Fauzee, M. S., & Din, A. (2009). Malaysian rugby referees’ perception on the athletes, coaches, and spectators’ misconduct: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(4), 102–106.
  23. Orhan, B. E., Karaçam, A., Özdemir, A. S., & Tunç, A. Ç. (2022). Examination of the relationship between referees' emotional regulation status and self-efficacy. Akdeniz Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı 1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.38021/asbid.1199433
  24. Sarıdede, Ç. (2018). Spor hakemlerinin özyeterlik düzeyleri ve karar verme becerilerinin incelenmesi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi, Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  25. Sevinç, K., Gerek, Z., & Arslan, E. (2021). Voleybol hakemlerinin empatik eğilimleri ve hakem öz yeterliklerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Egzersiz Psikolojisi Dergisi, 3(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.51538/intjourexerpsyc.955462
  26. Sivri, S. (2023). Examining the self-efficacy levels of tennis officials. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise, 25(3), 369–378. https://doi.org/10.15314/tsed.1326724
  27. Spencer, B. D. (2015). Self-efficacy and performance in volleyball referees [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Michigan State University.