SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Havacılık ve Uzay Çalışmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Causal and relational analysis of cargo aircraft selection criteria in aviation logistics

Havacılık lojistiğinde kargo uçağı seçim kriterlerinin nedensel ve ilişkisel analizi

Tahsin Altınkurt(ALANYA ALAADDİN KEYKUBAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8378-4370
Fahriye Merdivenci(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8956-7051
Ramazan Erturgut(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0240-5787
Pages
186–207
Publication Date
2026-08-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that the nose-loading configuration of the cargo door has the strongest influence on other selection criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aviation logistics is a new-generation integrated logistics approach that enables the safe, reliable, and cost-efficient flow of time-sensitive shipments from the point of origin to the customer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, charter airline operators seek to align their business model and positioning strategies with supply chain strategies in order to meet cargo demand.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that the nose-loading configuration of the cargo door has the strongest influence on other selection criteria.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Havacılık Lojistiği · Kargo Uçağı · Seçim Kriterleri

Abstract

Aviation logistics is a new-generation integrated logistics approach that enables the safe, reliable, and cost-efficient flow of time-sensitive shipments from the point of origin to the customer. The sustainability of this structure depends on the ability of supply chain actors in the aviation sector to effectively manage high operational costs. In this context, charter airline operators seek to align their business model and positioning strategies with supply chain strategies in order to meet cargo demand. However, there is no study in the literature that examines the alignment between business model, positioning strategy, and supply chain strategies in the context of aviation logistics based on aircraft selection criteria. This study aims to investigate the aircraft selection criteria of charter airline operators and the causal relationships among these criteria. The interactions among the criteria are analyzed using the DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method. The findings indicate that the nose-loading configuration of the cargo door has the strongest influence on other selection criteria. In addition, the internal fleet structure, global fleet availability, and operating aircraft in a single-type fleet are identified as criteria with strong and reciprocal interactions. Based on these findings, the study contributes to the logistics and supply chain management literature by identifying the key criteria considered in cargo aircraft selection by charter airline operators and by revealing the direction of relationships among these criteria, thereby addressing the strategic alignment between aircraft selection, business model, positioning, and supply chain strategies.

Özet

Havacılık lojistiği, zamana duyarlı gönderilerin kaynaktan müşteriye emniyetli, güvenilir ve maliyet etkin şekilde akışını sağlayan yeni nesil entegre bir lojistik yaklaşımıdır. Bu yapının sürdürülebilirliği, havacılık sektöründeki tedarik zinciri aktörlerinin yüksek operasyonel maliyetleri etkin biçimde yönetebilmesine bağlıdır. Bu kapsamda tarifesiz hava yolu işletmeleri, kargo talebini karşılayabilmek amacıyla iş modeli ve konumlanma stratejilerini tedarik zinciri stratejileriyle uyumlu hale getirmeye çalışmaktadır. Ancak literatürde, havacılık lojistiği bağlamında iş modeli, konumlanma stratejisi ve tedarik zinciri stratejileri arasındaki uyumu uçak seçim kriterleri temelinde inceleyen bir çalışmaya rastlanmamaktadır. Bu çalışma, charter hava yolu operatörlerinin uçak seçim kriterlerini ve bu kriterler arasındaki nedensel ilişkileri incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada kriterler arasındaki etkileşimler DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular, kargo uçağının kapısının burun yükleme konfigürasyonuna sahip olmasının diğer seçim kriterleri üzerinde en güçlü etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bununla birlikte charter hava lojistiği operatörünün işletme içi filo yapısı, küresel filo durumu ve uçakların aynı tipte işletilmesi kriterlerinin yoğun karşılıklı etkileşim oluşturduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu bulgular doğrultusunda çalışma, charter hava lojistiği operatörlerinin kargo uçağı seçiminde dikkate aldığı temel kriterleri ve bu kriterler arasındaki ilişkilerin yönünü ortaya koyarak uçak seçimi ile iş modeli, konumlanma ve tedarik zinciri stratejileri arasındaki stratejik uyumun değerlendirilmesi açısından lojistik ve tedarik zinciri yönetimi literatürüne katkı sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altınkurt, T., Merdivenci, F., Erturgut, R. (2026). Causal and relational analysis of cargo aircraft selection criteria in aviation logistics. Havacılık ve Uzay Çalışmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2, 186–207. https://doi.org/10.52995/jass.1897619

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (57)

  1. Aghazadeh, D. (2025). Machine learning for sustainable aviation logistics. Advances in Aerospace Engineering içinde (s. 174–203). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003370659
  2. Akyurt, İ. Z., & Kabadayı, N. (2020). Bulanık AHP ve bulanık gri ilişkiler analizi yöntemleri ile kargo uçak tipi seçimi: bir Türk havayolu firmasında uygulama. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 15(57), s. 38-55. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.609416
  3. Aksakal, E., & Dağdeviren, M. (2010). ANP ve DEMATEL yöntemleri ile personel seçimi problemine bütünleşik bir yaklaşım. Gazi Üniversitesi Mühendislik-Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(4), s. 905-913. https://izlik.org/JA75ME94UE
  4. Ardil, C. (2020). Aircraft selection process using preference analysis for reference ideal solution (PARIS). International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, 14(3), s. 76–84.
  5. Ardil, C. (2021). Freighter aircraft selection using entropic programming for multiple criteria decision making analysis. International Journal of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, 15(12), s. 125-132.
  6. Bağcı, B., & Kartal, M. (2024). A combined multi criteria model for aircraft selection problem in airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, 121, s. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2024.102566
  7. Başol, S. (2019). Servet Başol. https://servetbasol.com/ adresinden alındı
  8. Bruno, G., Esposito, E., & Genovese, A. (2015). A model for aircraft evaluation to support strategic decisions. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(13), s. 5580–5590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.054
  9. Chen, J. (2024). Modeling and simulation analysis of optimal layout scheme of aviation logistics park based on genetic algorithm. Advanced Control for Applications: Engineering and Industrial Systems, 6(4), s. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/adc2.200
  10. Corps, U. M. (2002). Aviation Logistics. United States Marine Corps. https://www.marines.mil/Portals/1/Publications/MCWP%203-21.2%20Aviation%20Logistics.pdf adresinden alındı.
  11. Dožić, S., & Kalić, M. (2014). An AHP approach to aircraft selection process. Transportation Research Procedia, 3, s. 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.10.102
  12. Dožić, S., & Kalić, M. (2016). Aircraft type selection problem: Application of different MCDM methods. In: Advanced Concepts, Methodologies and Technologies for Transportation and Logistics, 572. s. 156-175. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57105-8_7
  13. Dožić, S., Lutovac, T., & Kalić, M. (2018). Fuzzy AHP approach to passenger aircraft type selection. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, s. 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2017.08.003
  14. Erturgut, R. (2016). Lojistik ve Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi (1. baskı). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  15. Gomes, L. F. A. M., de Mattos Fernandes, J. E., & de Mello, J. C. C. S. (2014). A fuzzy stochastic approach to the multicriteria selection of an aircraft for regional chartering. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 48(3), s. 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.206
  16. Han, F. (2023). Civil aviation logistics transportation route optimization algorithm based on A* algorithm. In: International Conference on Frontier Computing, 1, 1131, s. 173–179. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9299-7_24
  17. Han, Y., & Deng, Y. (2018). An enhanced fuzzy evidential DEMATEL method with its application to identify critical success factors. Soft Computing, 22(15), s. 5073–5090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3311-x
  18. Hryhorak, M., & Šimák, L. (2020). Using the concept of supply chain management in aviation logistics. Logistics and Transport, s. 59–68.
  19. International Air Transport Association. (2018). International Air Transport Association Annual Review 2018. https://www.iata.org/publications/Documents/iata-annual-review-2018.pdf adresinden alındı.
  20. International Air Transport Association. (2019). International Air Transport Association Annual Review 2019. https://www.iata.org/contentassets/c81222d96c9a4e0bb4ff6ced0126f0bb/iata-annual-review-2019.pdf adresinden alındı.
  21. Isaienko, V., Hryhorak, M., Bugayko, D., & Zamiar, Z. (2020). Ecosystem approach to the formation of goods express delivery supply chains in aviation logistics. Logistics and Transport, 45(1–2), s. 19-42. https://doi.org/10.26411/83-1734-2015-1-45-2-20
  22. Jiao, Z. (2024). Analysis of the current situation and problems of China’s aviation logistics development. L. Wang, X. Wu, X. Jiang, J. Xiao, B. Liu, & Y. Gong (Dü) içinde, Contemporary logistics in China: Path to modernization and regional collaboration (s. 217–238). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-6839-4_9
  23. Kabadayı, N., & Dağ, S. (2019). DEMATEL ve Electre yöntemiyle tedarik zincirlerinde bayi performans değerlendirmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(1), s. 241–253. https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2019.39214
  24. Kenzhevayeva, Z., Katayeva, A., Kaikenova, K., Sarsembayeva, A., Babai, M. Z., Tsakalerou, M., & Papadopoulos, C. T. (2021). Inventory control models for spare parts in aviation logistics. Procedia Manufacturing, 55, s. 507–512. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2021.10.069
  25. Kiracı, K., & Bakır, M. (2018). Hava aracı seçim problemlerinde çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerinin kullanılması ve bir uygulama. Journal of Transportation and Logistics, 3(1), s.13–24. https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2018.03.01.02
  26. Kiracı, K., & Akan, E. (2020). Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, s. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101924
  27. Kütahya, C. K. (2026). Digitally enabled airbase readiness and strategic airlift planning for humanitarian crises through aviation logistics transformation. E. Akkartal & F. Mızrak (Dü) içinde, Reshaping humanitarian logistics with AI, predictive analytics, and autonomous systems (s. 273–302). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-3643-5.ch011
  28. Li, C. W., & Tzeng, G. H. (2009). Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), s. 9891–9898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.073
  29. Liang, L., & Chen, P. (2025). A simulation-based empirical study on the role of aviation logistics in driving high-quality and sustainable regional economic development: Focusing on dynamic mechanisms and key factors. PLOS ONE, 20(5), s. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323110
  30. Liu, Y. (2026). Dynamic resilience assessment of aviation logistics supply chains. Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management, 16(1), s. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.32738/JEPPM-2025-154
  31. Lyu, S., Zhu, W., Wang, X., & Xu, L. (2019). Multiple regression analysis based on carbon emissions from aviation logistics in Henan Province. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 310(5), s. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/310/5/052029
  32. Maywald, J. D., Reiman, A. D., Overstreet, R. E., & Johnson, A. W. (2019). Aircraft selection modeling: A multi-step heuristic to enumerate airlift alternatives. Annals of Operations Research, 274(1–2), s. 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2933-9
  33. Morgan, G., & Grabowski, M. (2025). Human machine teaming in mobile miniaturized aviation logistics systems in safety-critical settings. Journal of Safety and Sustainability, 2(1), s. 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsasus.2025.02.001
  34. Nebol, E., Uslu, T., & Uzel, E. (2015). Tedarik Zinciri ve Lojistik Yönetimi (4. baskı). Beta Basım Yayın.
  35. Özdemir, Y., Basligil, H., & Karaca, M. (2011). Aircraft selection using analytic network process: A case for Turkish Airlines. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering (WCE 2011) içinde (s. 1155–1159). http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2011/WCE2011_pp1155-1159.pdf adresinden alındı.
  36. Prabowo, L. P., & Zagloel, T. Y. M. (2022). Aircraft selection for cargo purposes in air charter company using the fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS method. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Industrial & Mechanical Engineering and Operations Management (IMEOM) içinde (s. 453–462). Dhaka, Bangladesh: IEOM Society International. https://doi.org/10.46254/BD05.20220140.
  37. Rahman, N. A. A., Mohammad, M. F., Rahim, S. A., Hassan, R., Ahmad, M. F., & Kadir, S. A. (2017). Shipper’s perceptions of aviation logistics service quality (LSQ) of air freight provider. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 12(3), s. 699–704.
  38. Salazar, J. C., & Mikuriya, K. (2023). Moving air cargo globally (3rd ed.). International Civil Aviation Organization. https://www.icao.int/sustainability/Documents/Moving-Air-Cargo-Globally.pdf adresinden alındı.
  39. Sales, M. (2016). Aviation Logistics: The Dynamic Partnership of Airfreight and Supply Chain. Kogan Page Publishers.
  40. See, T. K., Gurnani, A., & Lewis, K. (2004). Multi-attribute decision making using hypothetical equivalents and inequivalents. Journal of Mechanical Design, 126(6), s. 950–958. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1814389
  41. Semercioğlu, H., & Özkoç, H. (2019). Analitik hiyerarşi proses ile desteklenmiş sosyal seçim teorisi: Havayollarında uçak seçim süreci. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20(44), s. 67–92. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sobbiad/article/495297
  42. Şen, İ. K. (2014). Lojistik faaliyetlerin yönetimi ve maliyetleme yaklaşımları. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), s. 83–106. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ckuiibfd/article/365503
  43. Si, S. L., You, X. Y., Liu, H. C., & Zhang, P. (2018). DEMATEL technique: A systematic review of the state of the art literature on methodologies and applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018, s. 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3696457
  44. Sun, Y., Geng, N., Gong, S., & Yang, Y. (2020). Research on improved genetic algorithm in path optimization of aviation logistics distribution center. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 38(1), s. 29–37. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-179377
  45. Sun, Z. (2024). A study on the evaluation of competitiveness in the aviation logistics industry cluster in Zhengzhou. Scientific Reports, 14(1), s. 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52697-x
  46. Tanrıverdi, G., Lezki, Ş., & Doğan, Ü. (2022). Strategic decision-making for air cargo carriers on freighter type selection. International Journal of Management Economics and Business, 18(4), s. 1335–1350. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1122066
  47. Turkish Cargo. (2026, 19 Ocak). Turkish Cargo, havacılık endüstrisine özel yeni ürünü TK Aero’yu İstanbul’da tanıttı. https://turkishcargo.com/tr/hakkimizda/kurumsal/haberler/turkish-cargo-havacilik-endustrisine-ozel-yeni-urunu-tk-aeroyu-istanbulda-tanitti adresinden alındı.
  48. Varma, K., & Kumar, K. S. (2012). Criteria analysis aiding portfolio selection using DEMATEL. Procedia Engineering, 38, s. 3649–3661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.06.421
  49. Wang, H. (2015). Study on development of aviation logistics industry in China. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Education, Management, Arts, Economics and Social Science (ICEMAESS 2015) içinde (s. 201–204). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icemaess-15.2016.45
  50. Wang, L. (2025). The impact of tariffs and trade tensions on global aviation logistics: A Bayesian network risk analysis. International Journal of Advanced AI Applications, 1(7), 11–22.
  51. Wang, X., & Liu, Y. (2014). Aviation logistics development research. In 2014 International Conference on Mechatronics, Electronic, Industrial and Control Engineering (MEIC 2014) (pp. 1742–1745). https://doi.org/10.2991/meic-14.2014.382
  52. Wensveen, J. G. (2015). Air Transportation: A Management Perspective (8th ed.). Ashgate Publishing.
  53. Wu, P. J., & Yang, C. K. (2021). Sustainable development in aviation logistics: Successful drivers and business strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), s. 3763–3771. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2838
  54. Wu, W. W., & Lee, Y. T. (2007). Developing global managers’ competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems with Applications, 32(2), s. 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005
  55. Xiao, H. H., Yao, H. G., & He, F. J. (2019). Research on spatial structure of aviation logistics network in Jiangsu-Zhejiang-Shanghai based on SNA. CICTP 2019: Transportation in China—Connecting the World içinde (s. 90–101). American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482292.009
  56. Yang, Y. (2021). Application of internet of things technology in aviation warehousing and logistics. International Conference on Frontier Computing içinde (s. 1443–1449). Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-8059-5_113
  57. Zhao, M. (2012). Building collaboration system of air logistics service chain based on cloud computing. 2012 Second International Conference on Business Computing and Global Informatization (BCGIN) içinde (s. 615–617). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/BCGIN.2012.169