SavedAdd your journal

Journals / GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

An Architectural Reading of Zamyatin’s Intersectional Elements in The Novel “We”

Rabia Çiğdem Çavdar(ÇANKAYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MİMARLIK FAKÜLTESİ, MİMARLIK BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-5574-9831
Pages
26–37
Publication Date
2021-01-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As being a dystopia, the novel “We” criticizes the idealized beliefs that were presented as transparent, lucid and conductive.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:“We” was written by Russian novelist Yevgeny Zamyatin in 1921 after the Soviet Revolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To be at the edge of the conflicts was scrutinized at the novel, in which the protagonist, labeled as D-503, having a tentative position at the well-defined ground by the power which presented itself as the truth or the law.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As being a dystopia, the novel “We” criticizes the idealized beliefs that were presented as transparent, lucid and conductive.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Zamyatin · Intersectional Elements · Revolution

Abstract

“We” was written by Russian novelist Yevgeny Zamyatin in 1921 after the Soviet Revolution. To be at the edge of the conflicts was scrutinized at the novel, in which the protagonist, labeled as D-503, having a tentative position at the well-defined ground by the power which presented itself as the truth or the law. The narration was constructed via the diary of protagonist; how D-503 perceived the paradigm, which he had lived in, what kind of conflicts and contradictions he had been living with the system was questioned. Zamyatin chose very specific architectural elements to explain and criticize the dominant paradigm of the era -early 1920’s, and the periphery of that dominancy; like Green Wall, Glass Wall, logical labyrinth, cube square, and etc. These intersectional elements were constructed as in the form of blurred voids in order to unfold the ideological positions of the written period of the novel. The materialization and meaning of the walls, could be read as dialectic conceiving of how Zamyatin scrutinized both the revolution and the paradigm. As being a dystopia, the novel “We” criticizes the idealized beliefs that were presented as transparent, lucid and conductive.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çavdar, R. Ç. (2021). An Architectural Reading of Zamyatin’s Intersectional Elements in The Novel “We”. GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 26–37. https://doi.org/10.37246/grid.834422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Baricco, A. (2000). Ocean Sea. USA: Vintage.
  2. Barratt, A. (1985). The X-Factor in Zamyatin's “We”. The Modern Language Review. 80(3), 659-672. Modern Humanities Research Association. pp. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3729293
  3. Beaujour, E.K. (1988). Zamiatin's We and Modernist Architecture. Russian Review. 47(1), 49-60. Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Editors and Board of Trustees of the Russian Review. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/130443
  4. Berman, M. (2009). Deceptions of the Self in Zamyatin’s We. Disquise, Deception, Trompe-loeil, Interdisciplinary Perspectives, (Leslie Boldt-Irons, Corrado Federici, and Ernesto Virgulti, Eds.) New York: Peter Lang Publishing. pp 113-148.
  5. Burns, T. (2000). Zamyatin's We and Postmodernism. Utopian Studies. 11 (1).
  6. Carden, P. (1987). Utopia and Anti-Utopia: Aleksei Gastev and Evgeny Zamyatin. Russian Review. 46(1), 1-18. Blackwell Publishing on behalf of The Editors and Board of Trustees of the Russian Review. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/130045
  7. Dostoyevski, F. (1864). Yeraltından Notlar. translated by Celal Öner (1994). İstanbul: Oda Yayınları.
  8. Carr, J. S. (2009). Zamyatin’s We: Persuading The Individual to Sacrifice Self. Utah State University, Undergraduate Honors Theses, Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/honors/23
  9. Eagleton, T. (1991). Ideoloji. translated by Muttalip Özcan (1996). İstanbul:Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  10. Eagleton, T. (1996). Edebiyat Kuramı -Giriş. translated by Tuncay Birkan (2004). İstanbul:Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  11. Eagleton, T. (2002). Marxism and Literary Criticism, London:Routledge.
  12. Forty, A. (2000). Words and Buildings: a Vocabulary of Modern Architecture. New York: Thames & Hudson.
  13. Hutchings, W. (1981 - 1982). Structure and Design in a Soviet Dystopia: H. G. Wells, Constructivism, and Yevgeny Zamyatin's “We”. Journal of Modern Literature. 9(1), 81-102. Indiana University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3831277
  14. Jameson, F. (2007). Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Other Science Fictions. London and New York: Verso.
  15. Landauer, G. (1907). Revolution and Other Writings. translated by G. Kuhn (2010). Oakland: PM Press.
  16. Mannheim, K. (1929). İdeoloji ve Ütopya. translated by Mehmet Okyavuz (2002). Ankara: Epos Yayınları.
  17. Manguel, A. (2008). City of words: Understanding Civilization through Story. Toronto- Canada:Continuum.
  18. Manuel, F. E., & Manuel, F. P. (1979). Utopian Thought in the Western World. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Parrinder, P. (1973). Imagining the Future: Zamyatin and Wells. Science Fiction Studies. 1(1), 17-26. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4238838
  19. Scott, J. C. (2016). Authoritarian High Modernism. Readings in Planning Theory. (S. Fainstein and J. Defilippis, Eds.). UK:Wiley Blackwell. pp. 75-93.
  20. Zamyatin, Y. (1921). We. translated by Clarence Brown (1993). New York: Penguin Books.
  21. Zamyatin, Y. (1923). On Literature, Revolution, Entropy, and Other Matters. A Soviet Heretic: Essays by Yevgeny Zamyatin, translated by M. Ginsburg (1974), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  22. Zamyatin, Y., & Mirsky, D. S. (1923). The Cave. The Slavonic Review. 2 (4), 145-153. Modern Humanities Research Association. University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4201694
  23. Zamyatin, Y. (2009). Biz. translated by Algan Sezgintüredi. İstanbul: Versus Kitap.
  24. Scott, J. C. (2016). Authoritarian High Modernism. Readings in Planning Theory. (S. Fainstein and J. Defilippis, Eds.). UK:Wiley Blackwell. pp. 75-93.