SavedAdd your journal

Journals / GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Biyomimikri Yaklaşımının Döngüsel Biyoekonomi Perspektifi Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi

Mimaride Biyomimikri Yaklaşımının Döngüsel Biyoekonomiye Katkısı: Örnekler Işığında Bir Değerlendirme

Güneş Mutlu Avinç(Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1049-2689
Semra Arslan Selçuk(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2128-2858
Pages
768–793
Publication Date
2024-10-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, it is clear that biomimicry will enable the construction of a circular and sustainable environment that allows exploring the circularity of nature to achieve sustainable designs, products and processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In recent years, circular bioeconomy as a tool that offers solutions to sustainable development problems offers innovative solutions in sustainable design, energy, production of building materials and waste management in the field of architecture, promoting an ecological approach inspired by biological cycles.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is inevitable that this model, which mimics the circularity of natural systems, overlaps with biomimicry, which is a guide to problem solving by learning from systems, strategies and processes in nature.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, it is clear that biomimicry will enable the construction of a circular and sustainable environment that allows exploring the circularity of nature to achieve sustainable designs, products and processes.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Döngüsel ekonomi · Döngüsel biyoekonomi · Biyomimikri

Abstract

In recent years, circular bioeconomy as a tool that offers solutions to sustainable development problems offers innovative solutions in sustainable design, energy, production of building materials and waste management in the field of architecture, promoting an ecological approach inspired by biological cycles. It is inevitable that this model, which mimics the circularity of natural systems, overlaps with biomimicry, which is a guide to problem solving by learning from systems, strategies and processes in nature. In this context, this article discusses the relationship between the biomimicry approach and the concept of the circular bioeconomy, and evaluates the principles and examples of biomimicry in the context of the circular bioeconomy. It also evaluates the principles of the biomimicry approach in the context of the principles of the circular bioeconomy and identifies the need for the biomimicry approach within the circular bioeconomy model. Furthermore, the contribution of the biomimicry approach in architecture to the circular bioeconomy was examined in the context of examples. In conclusion, it is clear that biomimicry will enable the construction of a circular and sustainable environment that allows exploring the circularity of nature to achieve sustainable designs, products and processes.

Özet

Günümüzde üretimde benimsenen doğrusal ekonomi modeli sınırlı, yenilenemeyen ve geri dönüştürülemeyen kaynaklar nedeniyle ekolojik dengeyi bozmaktadır. Bu nedenle, son yıllarda sürdürülebilir kalkınma sorunlarına çözüm sunan bir araç olarak döngüsel biyoekonomi giderek önem kazanmaktadır. Döngüsel biyoekonomi, biyolojik ürünlerin enerji ve malzeme olarak kullanılmasına yönelik süreçlerin geliştirilmesi, üretilmesi ve kullanılması gibi ekonomik faaliyetleri içeren bir modeli ifade etmektedir. Doğal sistemlerin döngüselliğine öykünen bu modelin, doğadaki sistem, strateji ve süreçleri öğrenerek problem çözebilmenin bir yol göstericisi olan biyomimikri ile örtüşmesi kaçınılmazdır. Bu bağlamda bu makale kapsamında biyomimikri yaklaşımının döngüsel biyoekonomi kavramı ile olan ilişkisi ele alınmakta ve biyomimikri ilkeleri ve örnekleri, döngüsel biyoekonomi bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir. Ayrıca, biyomimikri yaklaşımının ilkeleri döngüsel biyoekonomi ilkeleri bağlamında değerlendirilerek, döngüsel biyoekonomi modeli içerisinde biyomimikri yaklaşımının gerekliliği ortaya konulmuştur. Elde edilen bilgiler ışığında, biyomimikrinin, sürdürülebilir tasarımlar, ürünler ve süreçler elde etmek için doğanın döngüselliğinin keşfedilmesine olanak sağlayan döngüsel ve sürdürülebilir bir çevrenin inşasını mümkün kılacağı açıktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Avinç, G. M., Selçuk, S. A. (2024). Biyomimikri Yaklaşımının Döngüsel Biyoekonomi Perspektifi Üzerinden Değerlendirilmesi. GRID - Mimarlık Planlama ve Tasarım Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 768–793. https://doi.org/10.37246/grid.1279744

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (79)

  1. Aguilar, A., Twardowski, T., & Wohlgemuth, R. (2019). Bioeconomy for sustainable development. Biotechnology Journal, 14(8), 1800638. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201800638
  2. Arslan, H. D., Yıldırım, K. & Eser, A. (2021), Biyomorfik yapıların algısal değerlendirilmesi, Edt. Aksoy, Y. ve Duyan, E. içinde, Çağdaş Mimarlık Araştırmaları: Kent, Kuram, Tasarım. İstanbul: DAKAM, 16-36. ISBN:978-625-7034-12-8.
  3. Bahadursingh, N. (2022). Design team develops bio-glass cladding tiles made from mussel shells. Archinect. 16 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://archinect.com/news/article/150311676/design-team-develops-bio-glass-cladding-tiles-made-from-mussel-shells adresinden erişildi.
  4. Badarnah, K., L. (2012), Towards the living envelope biomimetics for building envelope adaptation, Bachelor of Architecture Theses, Delft University of Technology, Netherlands.
  5. Bensaude-Vincent, B., Arribart, H., Bouligand, Y., & Sanchez, C. (2002). Chemists and the school of nature. New journal of chemistry, 26(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1039/b108504m
  6. Bernard, M. (2011). HOK / Vanderweil Process Zero Concept Building: As Green As. Algae? 8 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://buildipedia.com/aec-pros/featured-architecture/hok-vanderweil-process-zero-concept-building-as-green-asalgae adresinden erişildi.
  7. Crook, L. (2020). Sea Stone is a concrete-like material made from shells. Dezeen. 17 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://www.dezeen.com/2020/08/28/sea-stone-newtab-22-design-shells-materials/ adresinden erişildi.
  8. D'Amato, D., Veijonaho, S., & Toppinen, A. (2020). Towards sustainability? Forest-based circular bioeconomy business models in Finnish SMEs. Forest policy and economics, 110, 101848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.004
  9. Di Maio, F., Rem, P. C., Baldé, K., & Polder, M. (2017). Measuring resource efficiency and circular economy: A market value approach. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.02.009
  10. Diamanti MV., Yu CP. & Lee HK., (2015), Biotechnologies and biomimetics for civil engineering. cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 1-19.
  11. Dokter, G., Thuvander, L. & Rahe, U. (2021). How circular is current design practice? Investigating perspectives across industrial design and architecture in the transition towards a circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 692-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.032
  12. Efken, J., Dirksmeyer, W., Kreins, P., & Knecht, M. (2016). Measuring the importance of the bioeconomy in Germany: Concept and illustration. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 77(1), 9-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2016.03.008
  13. Elrayies, G. M. (2018). Microalgae: prospects for greener future buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81, 1175-1191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.032
  14. Evli, A. (2021). AuREUS ile UV ışığını elektriğe dönüştürmek. 16 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://teknoloji.org/aureus-ile-uv-isigini-elektrige-donusturmek/ adresinden erişildi.
  15. Frearson, A. (2022). Bureau de Change creates architectural tiles using glass made from mussels. Dezeen. 16 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://www.dezeen.com/2022/05/19/thames-glass-tiles-mussels-bureau-de-change-lulu-harrison/?li_source=LI&li_medium=bottom_block_1 adresinden erişildi.
  16. H. Silva, T., Mesquita-Guimarães, J., Henriques, B., Silva, F. S., & Fredel, M. C. (2019). The potential use of oyster shell waste in new value-added by-product. Resources, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8010013 Hahn, J. (2020). Solar panels made from food waste win inaugural James Dyson Sustainability Award. Dezeen. 18 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://www.dezeen.com/2020/11/27/aureus-carvey-ehren-maigue-james-dyson-awards-sustainability/ adresinden erişildi.
  17. Gawel, E., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N. (2019). A path transition towards a bioeconomy—The crucial role of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(11), 3005. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113005
  18. Gedik, Y. (2020). Döngüsel ekonomiyi anlamak: Teorik bir çerçeve. Turkish Business Journal, 1(2), 110-137. https://doi.org/10.51243/SAKA-TJMER.2020.5
  19. Giampietro, M. (2019). On the circular bioeconomy and decoupling: implications for sustainable growth. Ecological economics, 162, 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.05.001
  20. Ghisellini, P., & Ulgiati, S. (2020). Circular economy transition in Italy. Achievements, perspectives and constraints. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118360
  21. Gündoğdu E. & Arslan H.D., (2020). Mimaride enerji etkin cephe ve biyomimikri. Gazi Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji (GU J Sci, Part C), 8(4), 922-935. https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.799424
  22. Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., and Birkie, S. E. (2018). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. J. Clean. Prod. 175, 544–552. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111
  23. Jason, J. (2022). The Future of Architecture: Imagining a world where buildings are constructed from living materials. https://www.archdaily.com/987459/the-future-of-architecture-imagining-a-world-where-buildings-are-constructed-from-living-materials?ad_source=search&ad_medium=projects_tab&ad_source=search&ad_medium=search_result_all
  24. Kurnaz, L. M. ve Aksan Kurnaz, I. (2022). Biyoekonomi, Döngüsel Ekonomi ve Döngüsel Biyoekonomi. Bilim Teknik. 10, 58-63. https://bilimteknik.tubitak.gov.tr/system/files/makale/ayiklanan_basliksiz_sayfalar_44.pdf
  25. Leipold, S., & Petit-Boix, A. (2018). The circular economy and the bio-based sector-Perspectives of European and German stakeholders. Journal of cleaner production, 201, 1125-1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.01
  26. Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the business models for circular economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework, Sustainability, 8, 43, 1-28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043
  27. Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of cleaner production, 115, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042
  28. Lurie-Luke, E. (2014). Product and technology innovation: What can biomimicry inspire?. Biotechnology advances, 32(8), 1494-1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.10.002
  29. Luttenberger, L. R. (2020). Waste management challenges in transition to circular economy—Case of Croatia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256, 120495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120495
  30. MacArthur, E. (2013). Towards the circular economy, economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK. https://kidv.nl/media/rapportages/towards_a_circular_economy.pdf?1.2.1
  31. MacKinnon, R. B., Oomen, J., & Pedersen Zari, M. (2020). Promises and presuppositions of biomimicry. Biomimetics, 5(3), 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5030033
  32. Magazzino, C., Mele, M., Schneider, N., & Sarkodie, S. A. (2021). Waste generation, wealth and GHG emissions from the waste sector: Is Denmark on the path towards circular economy?. Science of the Total Environment, 755, 142510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142510
  33. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2010). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. North point press, pp. 208.
  34. Morelli, J. (2011). Environmental Sustainability: A Definition for Environmental Professionals. Journal of Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.14448/jes.01.0002
  35. Mohan, S. V., Dahiya, S., Amulya, K., Katakojwala, R., & Vanitha, T. K. (2019). Can circular bioeconomy be fueled by waste biorefineries—A closer look. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100277 Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Van Zanten, H. H., Metze, T. A., Termeer, C. J.,. & de Boer, I. J. (2021). Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy. Nature Food, 2(8), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7
  36. Namlis, K. G., & Komilis, D. (2019). Influence of four socioeconomic indices and the impact of economic crisis on solid waste generation in Europe. Waste management, 89, 190-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.04.012
  37. Neves, S. A., & Marques, A. C. (2022). Drivers and barriers in the transition from a linear economy to a circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 341, 130865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130865
  38. Pauli, G. A. (2010). The blue economy: 10 years, 100 innovations, 100 million jobs. Paradigm publications, pp. 336.
  39. Pawlyn, M. (2019). Biomimicry in architecture. London: RIBA Publishing, pp.1-36.
  40. Ragiel, S., & Phillips, R. (2018). The Circular Economy: How architects and designers can contribute to reducing waste. Construction Specifier. https://www.constructionspecifier.com/the-circular-economy/
  41. Srubar, W. (2020). Buildings grown by bacteria – new research is finding ways to turn cells into mini-factories for materials. https://theconversation.com/buildings-grown-by-bacteria-new-research-is-finding-ways-to-turn-cells-into-mini-factories-for-materials-131279
  42. Tan, E. C., & Lamers, P. (2021). Circular bioeconomy concepts—a perspective. Frontiers in Sustainability, 2, 701509. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frsus.2021.701509/full
  43. Tóth Szita, K. (2017). The application of life cycle assessment in circular economy. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering, 31, 5-9. https://doi.org/10.17676/HAE.2017.31.5
  44. URL-1: United Nations: https://www.un.org/sg/en/content/sg/statement/2017-05-30/secretary-general-climate-action-delivered, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  45. URL-2: United Nations: https://sdgs.un.org/goals, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  46. URL-3: United Nations: From Concept to Practice: https://www.un.org/en/ga/second/73/jm_conceptnote.pdf, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  47. URL-4: Kenniskaarten: https://kenniskaarten.hetgroenebrein.nl/en/knowledge-map-circular-economy/how-is-a-circular-economy-different-from-a-linear-economy/, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  48. URL-5: Business4goals: https://www.business4goals.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/%C4%B0sletmeler-icin-Dongusel-Ekonomi-Rehberi.pdf son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  49. URL-6: Circulardesignguide: https://www.circulardesignguide.com/post/loops, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  50. URL-7: Ellen MacArthur Foundation: https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/topics/circular-economy-introduction/overview, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  51. URL-8: Iberdrola: https://www.iberdrola.com/social-commitment/circular-design, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  52. URL-9: Business4goals: https://business4goals.org/PDF/Dongusel_Ekonomi_Rehberi.pdf, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  53. URL-10: Ellen Macarthur Foundation: https://ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy-diagram, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  54. URL-11: Eurostat: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/circular-economy#:~:text=What%20is%20the%20circular%20economy,minimising%20the%20generation%20of%20waste, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  55. URL-12: Biofuture Platform: http://www.biofutureplatform.org/post/new-biofuture-report-global-greenhouse-gas-goals-out-of-reach-without-biofuels-and-bioproducts, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  56. URL-13: Bioekonomy BW: https://www.biooekonomie-bw.de/en/bw/definition, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  57. URL-14: Cifor: https://www.cifor.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Flyer%20-%20Knowledge%20Guide_Circular%20Bioeconomy-v4.pdf, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  58. URL-15: European Commission: https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/research-area/environment/bioeconomy_en, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  59. URL-16: World Economic Forum: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/circular-bioeconomy-nature-reset/: son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  60. URL-17: Biomimicry Institute: https://biomimicry.org/what-is-biomimicry/, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  61. URL-18: Biolearn: https://biolearn.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/NinePrinciplesofBiomimicry_EU.pdf, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  62. URL-19: Circularity: https://circularitylive.com.au/community/how-the-circular-economy-uses-biomimicry-to-imitate-natural-systems/, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  63. URL-20: Eastgate: http://www.mickpearce.com/Eastgate.html, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  64. URL-21: Architecture Masterprize: https://architectureprize.com/winners/winner.php?id=3766, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  65. URL-22: Buildipedia.com: https://buildipedia.com/aec-pros/featured-architecture/hok-vanderweil-process-zero-concept-building-as-green-asalgae, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  66. URL-23: The Living: http://www.thelivingnewyork.com/?utm_medium=website&utm_source=archdaily.com, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  67. URL-24: Architizer: https://architizer.com/projects/hy-fi/, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  68. URL-25: Deutschland Land der Ideen: https://land-der-ideen.de/en/competitions/beyond-bauhaus/award-winners/nanocellulose-desert-shelter, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  69. URL-26: NCArchitects: https://www.ncarch.com/en/Projects/140, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  70. URL-27: Altervista: http://woodywood.altervista.org/nanocellulose-desert-shelter/?doing_wp_cron=1674194845.6202359199523925781250, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  71. URL-28: Newtab-22: https://www.newtab-22.com/%EB%B3%B5%EC%A0%9C-material-sea-stone, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  72. URL-29: Local works studio: https://localworksstudio.com/projects/shellcrete-transforming-sea-shells-into-low-carbon-materials/, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  73. URL-30: The James Dyson Award: https://www.jamesdysonaward.org/tr-TR/2020/project/aureus-aurora-renewable-energy-uv-sequestration/, son erişim: 17.03.2024.
  74. Vincent, J. F., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A., & Pahl, A. K. (2006). Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 3(9), 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2006.0127
  75. Wautelet, T. (2018). Exploring the role of independent retailers in the circular economy: a case study approach. European University for Economics and Management. (Unpublished Master-Thesis). eufom European University for Economics & Management A.s.b.l, Luxembourg.
  76. Wadia, A. P., & McAdams, D. A. (2010). Developing biomimetic guidelines for the highly optimized and robust design of complex products or their components. Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 6, 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2010-28708
  77. Wadhwani, T. (2022). How the circular economy uses biomimicry to imitate natural systems. 17 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://acehub.org.au/news/how-the-circular-economy-uses-biomimicry-to-imitate-natural-systems adresinden erişildi.
  78. Bernard, M. (2011). HOK / Vanderweil Process Zero Concept Building: As Green As. Algae? 8 Mart 2024 tarihinde https://buildipedia.com/aec-pros/featured-architecture/hok-vanderweil-process-zero-concept-building-as-green-asalgae adresinden erişildi.
  79. Mohan, S. V., Dahiya, S., Amulya, K., Katakojwala, R., & Vanitha, T. K. (2019). Can circular bioeconomy be fueled by waste biorefineries—A closer look. Bioresource Technology Reports, 7, 100277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100277 Muscat, A., de Olde, E. M., Ripoll-Bosch, R., Van Zanten, H. H., Metze, T. A., Termeer, C. J.,. & de Boer, I. J. (2021). Principles, drivers and opportunities of a circular bioeconomy. Nature Food, 2(8), 561-566. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00340-7