SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2

Does the use of diapers have an effect on complications of circumcision?

Bebek bezi kullanımı sünnet komplikasyonları üzerine etkili midir?

Mehmet DEMİR
Hüseyin EREN
Pages
53–57
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Diaper use was not found to have any effect on complications of circumcision.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim is to evaluate the complications in patients who are circumcised before school age and investigate the effect of diaper use on complications of circumcision.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: 1,669 cases between 20 days and 7 years of age who were circumcised under local anaesthesia were investigated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Diaper use was not found to have any effect on complications of circumcision.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim is to evaluate the complications in patients who are circumcised before school age and investigate the effect of diaper use on complications of circumcision. Method: 1,669 cases between 20 days and 7 years of age who were circumcised under local anaesthesia were investigated retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of those who used diapers, and group 2 consisted of those who did not use diapers. Those who were operated due to urogenital pathologies and simultaneously circumcised were not included in the groups. The children who normally used diapers continued to be diapered following circumcision. Results: The most common complication following circumcision was bleeding (2.9%). Other complications included infection (2.2%), ecchymosis (2.3%), skin adhesion (1.3%), urinary retention (0.1%), redundant foreskin/circumcision revision (0.1%), and meatal stenosis (0.1%). Bleeding, infection, ecchymosis, skin adhesion, urinary retention, redundant foreskin-circumcision revision and meatal stenosis rates did not vary significantly (p>0.05) between group 1 and group 2. Conclusion: Diaper use was not found to have any effect on complications of circumcision.

Özet

Amaç: Okul öncesi dönemde sünnet yapılan hastalarda komplikasyonların değerlendirilmesi ve bebek bezi kullanımının sünnet komplikasyonları üzerine etkisinin araştırılması. Yöntem: Yirmi gün ile 7 yaş arasında, tamamı lokal anestezi altında yapılan 1,669 sünnet olgusu retrospektif olarak incelendi ve hastalar iki gruba ayrıldı. Grup 1 bez kullananlar, Grup 2 ise bez kullanmayanlar olarak belirlendi. Ürogenital patolojiler nedeniyle opere edilip eş seanslı sünnet yapılanlar gruplara dahil edilmedi. Bebek bezi kullanan çocukların sünnet sonrası bez bağlamalarına devam edildi. Bulgular: Sünnet sonrası en sık görülen komplikasyonun %2,9 ile kanama olduğu görüldü. Enfeksiyon (%2,2), ekimoz (%2,3), cilt yapışıklığı (%1,3), idrar retansiyonu (%0,1), cilt fazlalığısünnet revizyonu (%0,1), meatal stenoz (%0,1) görülen diğer komplikasyonlardı. Grup 1 ve grup 2’de kanama, enfeksiyon, ekimoz, cilt yapışıklığı, idrar retansiyonu, cilt fazlalığı-sünnet revizyonu, meatal stenoz oranı anlamlı (p>0.05) farklılık göstermedi. Sonuç: Bebek bezi kullanımının sünnet komplikasyonları üzerine etkisi görülmedi.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, M., EREN, H. (2020). Does the use of diapers have an effect on complications of circumcision?. Çocuk Cerrahisi Dergisi, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 2, 53–57. https://ajindex.com/articles/148751

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Gatrad AR, Sheikh A, Jacks H. Religious circumcision and the human rights act. Arch Dis Child. 2002;86:76-8.
  2. Glass JM. Religious circumcision: a Jewish view. BJU Int. 1999;83(1):17-21.
  3. Yurdakok M. Tarihte Sünnet. Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Dergisi. 2000;43:303-11
  4. Brisson PA, Patel HI, Feins NR. Revision of circumcision in children:Report of 56 cases. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:13436.
  5. Vanbuskirk K, Winer RL, Hughes et al. Circumcision and Acquisition of Human Papillomavirus Infection in Young Men. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38:1074-81.
  6. Drain PK, Halperin DT, Hughes JP, Klausner JD, Bailey RC. Male circumcision religion and infectious diseases:an ecologic analysis of 118 developing countries. BMC Infect Dis. 2006;6:172.
  7. Karaman MI. Tüm yönleriyle sünnet. Proceedings of Fourth Southeastern Anatolia Pediatric Urology Days. 2000;Gaziantep, Turkey
  8. Singh-Grewal D, Macdessi J, Craig J. Circumcision for the prevention of urinary tract infection in boys: a systematic review of randomised trials and observational studies. Arch Dis Child. 2005;90:853-8.
  9. Rippke F, Berardesca E, Weber TM. pH and Microbial Infections. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2018;54:87-94.
  10. American Academy of Pediatrics. Task force on cir cumcision: Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics. 1999;103:686-93.
  11. Özdemir E. Significantly increased complication risks with mass circumcisions. Br J Urol. 1997;80:136-9.
  12. Karaman Mİ, Öztürk M, Koca O. Sünnet Komplikasyonları. Androloji Bülteni. 2013;15(53):75-8
  13. Weiss HA, Larke N, Halperin D, Schenker I. Complications of circumcision in male neonates, infants and children: a systematic review. BMC Urology. 2010;10:2.
  14. Sasmaz I, Antmen B, Leblebisatan G, Şahin Karagün B, Kilinç Y, Tuncer R. Circumcision and complications in patients with haemophilia in southern part of Turkey: Çukurova experience. Haemophilia. 2012;18:426-30.
  15. MM Utanğaç, M Dağgülü, İ Yağmur. Adölesan dönemi ve öncesinde yapılan sünnetlerin karşılaştırılması. Dicle Tıp Dergisi. 2013;40 (3):396-400. http