Journals / 7tepe Klinik / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of survival of implants placed simultaneously with sinus floor elevation operation at different residual bone height

Farklı rezidüel kemik yüksekliğinde sinüs tabanı yükseltme operasyonu ile eşzamanlı yerleştirilen implantların sağkalımının değerlendirilmesi

Pages
61–68
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: The study concluded that the residual bone height did not affect the survival rate of dental implants placed simultaneously with the sinus floor elevation operation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Resorption occurs after teeth loss in alveolar ridge.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients were divided into two groups; ≥5 mm (control group) and <5 mm (test group) by measuring the bone height under sinus floor using dental volumetric tomography.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: The study concluded that the residual bone height did not affect the survival rate of dental implants placed simultaneously with the sinus floor elevation operation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Resorption occurs after teeth loss in alveolar ridge. In case of insufficient bone height in posterior maxilla, sinus floor operation for implant placement has been successfully applied for many years. The purpose of this study is to assess the success of implants placed simultaneously with sinus floor elevation operation, in cases where bone height under the sinus floor in the posterior maxilla is insufficient for implant placement. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study design, patients who were systemically healthy and required dental implant in posterior maxilla were included. Patients were divided into two groups; ≥5 mm (control group) and <5 mm (test group) by measuring the bone height under sinus floor using dental volumetric tomography. Survival rates of implants were evaluated during follow-up. Results: In this study, 62 implants placed in 31 patients (Control: 35, Test: 27) were evaluated. When the two groups included in the study were compared, it was observed that there was no statistically significant difference in survival rates. Conclusions: The study concluded that the residual bone height did not affect the survival rate of dental implants placed simultaneously with the sinus floor elevation operation.

Özet

Amaç: Dişlerin kaybedilmesi sonrası alveolar kemikte rezorpsiyon meydana gelmektedir. Posterior maksillada yetersiz kemik yüksekliği durumunda, implant yerleştirilmesi için sinüs tabanı operasyonu uzun yıllardır başarılı bir şekilde uygulanmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı posterior maksillada sinüs tabanı altında kemik yüksekliğinin implant yerleştirilmesi için yetersiz olduğu durumlarda, sinüs tabanı yükseltme operasyonu ile eşzamanlı yerleştirilen implantların başarısını değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif planlanan çalışmaya sistemik olarak sağlıklı ve posterior maksillada dental implant ihtiyacı olan hastalar dahil edilmiştir. Hastalar dental volumetrik tomografi kullanılarak sinüs tabanı altında mevcut kemik yüksekliği ölçülerek ≥5 mm (Kontrol grubu) ve < 5 mm (Test grubu) olmak üzere iki gruba ayrılmıştır. Yerleştirilen implantların takip süresince sağkalım oranları değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: Çalışmada toplam 31 hastaya yerleştirilen 62 implant (Kontrol: 35, Test: 27) değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmaya dahil edilen her iki grup kıyaslandığında sağkalım oranları açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark olmadığı gözlemlenmiştir. Sonuçlar: Çalışmada rezidüel kemik yüksekliğinin, sinüs tabanı yükseltme operasyonu ile aynı seansta yerleştirilen dental implantların sağkalımını etkilemediği sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEDELOĞLU, E., GÜLTEKİN, B. A. (2018). Evaluation of survival of implants placed simultaneously with sinus floor elevation operation at different residual bone height. 7tepe Klinik, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 61–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/148527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Gehrke SA, Tavares da Silva Neto U. Does the time of osseointegration in the maxilla and mandible differ? J Craniofac Surg 2014; 25: 2117-21120.
  2. Kahnberg KE, Vannas-Löfqvist L. Sinus lift procedure using a 2-stage surgical technique: I. Clinical and radiographic report up to 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 876-884.
  3. Albrektsson T, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. State of the art of oral implants. Periodontol 2000 2008; 47: 15-26. Le Guehennec L et. al. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1103-1110.
  4. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M. Methods to treat the edentulous posterior maxilla: Implants with sinus grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 867-871.
  5. Kahnberg KE, Vannas-Löfqvist L. Sinus lift procedure using a 2-stage surgical technique: I. Clinical and radiographic report up to 5 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 876-884.
  6. Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, Reintsema H, Batenburg RH. Bone grafting of the floor of the maxillary sinus for the placement of endosseous implants. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 35: 119-125.
  7. Peleg M, Mazor Z, Chaushu G, Garg AK. Sinus floor augmentation with simultaneous implant placement in the severely atrophic maxilla. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 1397- 1403. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, Iacono VJ. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 11-45.
  8. Tiwana PS, Kushner GM, Haug RH. Maxillary sinus augmentation. Dent Clin North Am 2006; 50: 409-424.
  9. Chen TW, Chang HS, Leung KW, Lai YL, Kao SY. Implant placement immediately after the lateral approach of the trap door window procedure to create a maxillary sinus lift without bone grafting: A 2-year retrospective evaluation of 47 implants in 33 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65: 2324-2328.
  10. Jurisic M, Markovic A, Radulovic M, Brkovic BM, Sándor GK. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation: Comparing osteotome with lateral window immediate and delayed implant placements. An interim report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 820-827. de Vicente JC, Hernández-Vallejo G, Braña-Abascal P, Peña I. Maxillary sinus augmentation with autologous bone harvested from the lateral maxillary wall combined with bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: Clinical and histologic observations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 430- 438. Lambert F, Lecloux G, Rompen E. One-step approach for implant placement and subant