Journals / Alternatif Politika / 2016 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

A TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMATIC IN SECURITY PARADIGM: "NUCLEAR DAMAGE"

GÜVENLİK PARADİGMASINDA SINIRAŞAN BİR ÇEVRE SORUNSALI: "NÜKLEER ZARAR"

Pages
128–159
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study which aims for elimination of transboundary nuclear damages expressed an international regime and a set of proposals for the settlement of environmental conflicts on the case studies of Chernobyl and Fukushima transboundary nuclear damages in the future under the name of environmental liability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Environmental damages as a factor that threat environmental security represent ecosystem damages due to human activities or risk of depletion of constitutions or recourses which are valuable for human existence.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As for transboundary environmental damages which are defined as environmental damages, which occurs as a result of dangerous activities by a country or taking place in a territory of a country, affecting other country territories and national jurisdictions or international territories negatively by going beyond the country's borders; may cause nuclear pollution, marine oil transportation, air, water and soil pollution and harmful effects of hazardous substances.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study which aims for elimination of transboundary nuclear damages expressed an international regime and a set of proposals for the settlement of environmental conflicts on the case studies of Chernobyl and Fukushima transboundary nuclear damages in the future under the name of environmental liability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Environmental damages as a factor that threat environmental security represent ecosystem damages due to human activities or risk of depletion of constitutions or recourses which are valuable for human existence. As for transboundary environmental damages which are defined as environmental damages, which occurs as a result of dangerous activities by a country or taking place in a territory of a country, affecting other country territories and national jurisdictions or international territories negatively by going beyond the country's borders; may cause nuclear pollution, marine oil transportation, air, water and soil pollution and harmful effects of hazardous substances. The most dangerous source that causes transboundary damages is nuclear pollution. Activities that may cause nuclear damages are the nuclear tests especially on the high seas, nuclear power plants, nuclear ships and radioactive wastes discarded by leakage and accidents during the transportation of nuclear materials. These activities may result in devastating consequences out of human's control and with no return. This study which aims for elimination of transboundary nuclear damages expressed an international regime and a set of proposals for the settlement of environmental conflicts on the case studies of Chernobyl and Fukushima transboundary nuclear damages in the future under the name of environmental liability.

Özet

Sınıraşan zararlar bir ülke tarafından ya da bir ülke toprağında gerçekleştirilen tehlikeli faaliyetler sonucunda oluşan çevresel tahribatların o ülke sınırları dışına çıkıp başka ülke topraklarını, ulusal yetki alanlarını veya uluslararası alanları olumsuz bir biçimde etkilemesi olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Sınıraşan zararlara neden olan en tehlikeli kirlenmeden oluşan zararlara sebep olabilecek faaliyetler, özellikle açık denizlerde yapılan nükleer denemeler, nükleer santral kazaları, nükleer gemilerde tehlikeli maddelerin taşınması sırasındaki sızıntılar ve radyoaktif atıklardır. Bu faaliyetler, insan kontrolü dışında ve geri dönüşümü olmayan yıkıcı sonuçlar doğurabilmektedir. Sınıraşan nitelikteki nükleer zararların ortadan kaldırılmasını hedefleyen bu çalışma, çevresel sorumluluk adı altında uluslararası bir rejime tabi tutularak uygulanacak müeyyideler ışığında, Çernobil ve Fukuşima sınıraşan nükleer felaketleri gibi ileride ortaya çıkabilecek çevresel uyuşmazlıkların çözümüne yönelik önerileri dile getirmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZKAN, A. (2016). A TRANSBOUNDARY ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMATIC IN SECURITY PARADIGM: "NUCLEAR DAMAGE". Alternatif Politika, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 128–159. https://ajindex.com/articles/148422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ago, Roberto (1970), "The Origin of International Responsibility", Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 2, A/CN.4/233: 177-199.
  2. Algan, Nesrin, "Kirlilikten Ulusal Güvenliğe", http://www.yesilufuklar.info/rec-bulten/rec-turkiye/640 (24.08.2015).
  3. Algan, Nesrin (1995), Bölgesel Çevre Yönetiminde Model Arayışları: Akdeniz, Çevre Yazıları-8, T.C. Çevre Bakanlığı, Ankara.
  4. Altın, Süreyya ve Hayri Yılmaz Kaptan (2006), "Radyoaktif Atıkların Oluşumu, Etkileri ve Yönetimi", Zonguldak Karaelmas Üniversitesi 12. Mühendislik Dekanlar Konseyi ve 2. Ulusal Mühendislik Kongresi, UMK-13, 11-13 Mayıs 2006,
  5. Zonguldak. Arevalo, Luis Barrionuevo (2005), "The Work of the International Law Commission in the Field of International Environmental Law", Environmental Affairs Law Review, 32 (2): 493-507.
  6. Art, Robert (1993), "Security", Joel Krieger (Ed.), The Oxford Companion to Politics of the World (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 820-832.
  7. Aslan, İsmail Yılmaz (2008),
  8. Enerji Hukuku, Petrol Piyasasında Rekabet ve Regülasyon, Cilt 2, (Bursa: Ekin Kitabevi). Aydoğdu, Murat (2009), Sivil Amaçlı Nükleer Santral İşletenin ve Nükleer Madde Taşıyanın Hukuki Sorumluluğu (Ankara: Adalet Yayınları). Barnett Jon ve Stephen Dovers (2001), "Environmental Security, Sustainability and Policy", Pacifica Review: Peace, Security and Global Change, 13 (2). Birdişli, Fikret (2011), "Yeni Ulusal Güvenlik Politikalarının Metaekolojik Temelleri ve Türkiye'nin Ulusal Güvenliği", İnönü Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Doktora Tezi, Malatya. Boulanenkov, V. ve Brands, B. (1988), "Nuclear Liability Status and Prospescts", International Atomic Energy Agency Bulletin, 30 (4). Boyle, Alan E. (2005), "Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law", Journal of Environmental Law, 17 (1): 3-26.
  9. Brauch, Hans Günter (2008), "Güvenliğin Yeniden Kavramsallaştırılması: Barış, Güvenlik, Kalkınma ve Çevre Kavramsal Dörtlüsü", Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 5 (18): 1-47.
  10. Brunnee, Jutta (2007), "Common Areas, Common Heritage, and Common Concern", Jutta Brunnee and others (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (United States: Oxford University). Brunnee, Jutta (2004), "Of Sense and Sensibility: Reflections on International Liability Regimes as Tools for Environmental Protection", International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53 (2): 351-368.
  11. Buzan, Barry (1991), "New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Security", International Affairs,