SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature / 2026 / Volume: 8 Issue: 1

Wordsworth’s Metropolis and Mental Life in The Prelude: Reading William Wordsworth’s London through Georg Simmel’s Theory of Modernity and Urbanity

Gökhan Albayrak(ANKARA UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2703-4326
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-02-27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This interdisciplinary reading situates Wordsworth at the threshold between Romanticism and modernity, showing how his poetic vision engages deeply with the emerging consciousness of the modern urban self.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A Romantic poet, William Wordsworth not only wanders lonely as a cloud in the wild but also wanders lonely in the crowd in the city.
📊
Key Findings & Data:While Wordsworth is often celebrated as a Romantic poet of nature, his depictions of London in The Prelude reveal an acute awareness of urban life, capturing the sense of alienation, sensory overload, and solitude in crowds that prefigures modern experiences of the metropolis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This interdisciplinary reading situates Wordsworth at the threshold between Romanticism and modernity, showing how his poetic vision engages deeply with the emerging consciousness of the modern urban self.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:William Wordsworth · English Romanticism · Modernity

Abstract

A Romantic poet, William Wordsworth not only wanders lonely as a cloud in the wild but also wanders lonely in the crowd in the city. While Wordsworth is often celebrated as a Romantic poet of nature, his depictions of London in The Prelude reveal an acute awareness of urban life, capturing the sense of alienation, sensory overload, and solitude in crowds that prefigures modern experiences of the metropolis. By reading these passages through the lens of Georg Simmel’s theory of modern urban consciousness, Wordsworth emerges as not only a poet of the countryside but also a perceptive observer of the city and its psychological impact on individuals. This study explores how Wordsworth’s representation of London in Book VII anticipates Simmel’s analysis of the metropolitan condition, particularly the development of the blasé attitude, the tension between individuality and anonymity, and the intellectualization of emotional life. The poet’s observations of London’s crowds, spectacles, and social performances reflect the fragmentation and impersonality that Simmel associates with modern urban experience. Yet, Wordsworth also discovers within this chaos fleeting moments of beauty, compassion, and moral awareness that counter the city’s dehumanizing tendencies. By juxtaposing the sensory and moral economies of the metropolis with those of the natural world, Wordsworth transforms the city into a site of psychological and philosophical inquiry. This interdisciplinary reading situates Wordsworth at the threshold between Romanticism and modernity, showing how his poetic vision engages deeply with the emerging consciousness of the modern urban self.

🔖

Cite This Article

Albayrak, G. (2026). Wordsworth’s Metropolis and Mental Life in The Prelude: Reading William Wordsworth’s London through Georg Simmel’s Theory of Modernity and Urbanity. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, Volume: 8 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1482022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Brown, B. (1999). The secret life of things (Virginia Woolf and the matter of modernism). Modernism/modernity, 6(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1353/mod.1999.0013
  2. Chase, C. (1986). Decomposing figures: Rhetorical readings in the Romantic tradition. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  3. Folliot, L., & Lopoukhine, J. (2019). Writing out of place: Wordsworth and Woolf in London. Sillages Critiques, 27. https://doi.org/10.4000/sillagescritiques.9128
  4. Friedman, G. (1989). History in the background of Wordsworth’s “Blind Beggar”. ELH, 56(1), 125-148.
  5. Gill, S. (2011). Wordsworth’s revisitings. Oxford University Press.
  6. Gurr, J. M. (2011). The literary representation of urban complexity and the problem of simultaneity: A sketchy inventory of strategies. In J. M. Gurr & W. Raussert (Eds.), Cityscapes in the Americas and Beyond: Representations of Urban Complexity in Literature and Film (pp. 11–36). Bilingual Press.
  7. Güneş, A. (2003). William Wordsworth’s ‘double awareness’ of memory in Virginia Woolf’s Mrs. Dalloway. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 4(2), 183-196.
  8. Hartman, G. H. (1964). Wordsworth’s poetry 1787-1814. Yale University Press.
  9. Heffernan, J. A. W. (1998). Wordsworth’s London: The imperial monster. Studies in Romanticism, 37(3), 421-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/25601345
  10. Hugo, F. (1987). The city and the country: Books VII and VIII of Wordsworth’s “The Prelude.” Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, 69, 1-14. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41801761
  11. King, R. (1993). Wordsworth, panoramas, and the prospect of London. Studies in Romanticism, 32(1), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/25600995
  12. Lehan, R. (1998). The city in literature: An intellectual and cultural history. University of California Press. Levine, D. N. (1971). Introduction (pp. ix-lxv). In D. N. Levine (Ed. & Trans.), Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms. University of Chicago Press.
  13. Lewis, N. (2000). The climbing body, nature and the experience of modernity. Body & Society, 6(3–4), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X00006003004
  14. Löwy, M., & Sayre, R. (2002). Romanticism against the tide of modernity. Duke University Press.
  15. Meyer, M. (2003). Theatrical spectacles and the spectators’ positions in Wordsworth’s London. Literary London: Interdisciplinary Studies in the Representation of London, 1(1). http://www.literarylondon.org/london-journal/march2003/meyer.html
  16. Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Harvard University Press.
  17. Öztürk, S. (2004). William Wordsworth’s preface to Lyrical Ballads: A comparative analysis of classical ideas and Matthew Arnold. Kare International Journal of Comparative Literature, 18, 58-70. https://doi.org/10.38060/kare.1393053.
  18. Peer, L. H. (Ed.). (2011). Romanticism and the city. Palgrave Macmillan.
  19. Pinch, A. (1996). Strange fits of passion: Epistemologies of emotion, Hume to Austen. Stanford University Press. Simmel, G. (1971). The metropolis and mental life (pp. 324–339). In D. N. Levine (Ed. & Trans.), Georg Simmel: On individuality and social forms. University of Chicago Press.
  20. Simpson, D. (2009). Wordsworth, commodification, and social concern: The poetics of modernity. Cambridge University Press.
  21. Stoddard, E. W. (1988). “All freaks of nature”: The human grotesque in Wordsworth’s city. Philological Quarterly, 67(1), 37–61.
  22. Stokes, C. (2015). London. In A. Bennet (Ed.), William Wordsworth in context (pp. 215-223). Cambridge University Press.
  23. Tedeschi, S. (2017). Urbanization and English Romantic poetry. Cambridge University Press.
  24. Wordsworth, W. (1994). The Prelude; or, Growth of a poet’s mind (Book VII, pp. 815–829). In The collected poems of William Wordsworth. Wordsworth Editions.