Journals / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2006 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

Heidegger Varoluşçuluğu ve Post-Marksizm

Heideggerian Existentialism and Post-Marxism

Pages
127–134
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it also argues that this problematic articulation reveals the inherent theoretical limitations of post-Marxism, which are basically related to the dissolution of "the social" from the theoretical horizon of post-Marxism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article, the articulation of Heideggerian existentialism to the post-Marxist theory of politics is examined critically.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The article argues that this articulation is problematic, as the theoretical and philosophical problems generated by this incorporation remain unresolved.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it also argues that this problematic articulation reveals the inherent theoretical limitations of post-Marxism, which are basically related to the dissolution of "the social" from the theoretical horizon of post-Marxism.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this article, the articulation of Heideggerian existentialism to the post-Marxist theory of politics is examined critically. With this articulation, post-Marxism aims to grant politics an ontological status by using concepts which are detached from their philosophical context. The article argues that this articulation is problematic, as the theoretical and philosophical problems generated by this incorporation remain unresolved. However, it also argues that this problematic articulation reveals the inherent theoretical limitations of post-Marxism, which are basically related to the dissolution of "the social" from the theoretical horizon of post-Marxism.

Özet

Bu çalışmada Heidegger'in varoluşçu felsefesinin post-Marksist siyaset kuramına eklemlenmesinin eleştirel bir değerlendirmesi yapılıyor. Bu bağlamda Heidegger'in felsefesine özgü kavramların ait oldukları bağlamdan koparılarak siyasete ontolojik bir nitelik kazandırmak üzere kullanıldığı ancak bu girişimin ' sorunlu'olduğu vurgulanıyor. Ayrıca, kuramsal ve felsefi olarak çözülememiş olan bu eklemlenmenin post-Marksist siyaset kuramının içsel sınırlarını açığa çıkardığı tartışılıyor ve bu sorunun büyük ülçüde "toplumsal" olanın bu kuram içinde kayboluşuyla ilgili olduğu sonucuna varılıyor.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTUĞRUL, K. (2006). Heidegger Varoluşçuluğu ve Post-Marksizm. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 127–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/148198

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1991). The Political Ontology of Heidegger, (trans.) P. Collier. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  2. Heidegger, M. (1995). Being and Time, (trans.) J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford: Blackwell. Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. London:Verso. Laclau, E. (1990). New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time. London: Verso. Laclau, E. and Zac, L. (1994). "Minding the Gap: The Subject of Politics," in E. Laclau (ed.),The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso. Lyotard, F. (1990). Heidegger and "the Jews." Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  3. Mouffe, C. (1993). Return of the Political. London: Verso. Nash, K. (2002). "Thinking Political Sociology: Beyond the Limits of Post-Marxism," History of the Human Sciences, 15(4): 97-114.
  4. Rickey, C. (2002).
  5. Revolutionary Saints, Heidegger, National Socialism, and Antinomian Politics. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvannia State University Press.
  6. Townshend, J. (2004). "Laclau and Mouffe's Hegemonic Project: The Story So Far," Political Studies, 52: 269-288.