Journals / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2018 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3

Clinical Outcomes of a New Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens

Pages
116–121
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Further studies with larger study groups and long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm these results.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a new aberration-free aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Medical records of patients who were followed for 6 months were reviewed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Further studies with larger study groups and long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm these results.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a new aberration-free aspheric monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: This single-center retrospective study included eyes of cataract patients implanted with a new aberration-free aspheric IOL. Medical records of patients who were followed for 6 months were reviewed. Data on visual acuity (distance, intermediate, and near), refractive error (sphere, cylinder, and manifest spherical equivalent [MSE]), contrast sensitivity, and adverse events were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 38 eyes of 30 patients with a mean age of 65.7±10.6 years were included in the study. At 6-month post-operative, 100% of the eyes had achieved a corrected distance visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR or better, 89% of the eyes had achieved a corrected intermediate visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR or better, and 89% of the eyes had achieved a corrected near visual acuity of J3 or better. Postoperatively, there was a significant reduction in the spherical (p<0.01) and cylindrical (p=0.01) refraction compared to baseline with a mean final MSE of -0.03±0.40 diopters. Post-operative low contrast (10%) visual acuity remained stable (p=0.54) through follow-up visits with a mean of 0.35±0.17 logMAR at the 6-month visit. There were no adverse events associated with the study IOL. Conclusion: The study IOL was safely implanted without any adverse events and improved visual acuity in cataract surgery patients while preserving visual quality over the 6-month follow-up period. Further studies with larger study groups and long-term follow-up are necessary to confirm these results.

🔖

Cite This Article

TOYGAR, B., KIZILOĞLU, Ö. Y., TOYGAR, O., HACIMUSTAFAOĞLU, A. M. (2018). Clinical Outcomes of a New Aspheric Monofocal Intraocular Lens. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 3, 116–121. https://ajindex.com/articles/148138

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Schuster AK, Tesarz J, Vossmerbaeumer U. The impact on vi-sion of aspheric to spherical monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Oph-thalmology 2013;120:2166–75.
  2. Kretz FT, Tandogan T, Khoramnia R, Auffarth GU. High order aberration and straylight evaluation after cataract surgery with implantation of an aspheric, aberration correcting monofocal intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol 2015;8:736–41.
  3. Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NE. A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberra-tion of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg;18:683–91.
  4. Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P. Comparison of wavefront aber-rations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2004;20:297–306.
  5. Awwad ST, Warmerdam D, Bowman RW, Dwarakanathan S, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Contrast sensitivity and higher or-der aberrations in eyes implanted with AcrySof IQ SN60WF and AcrySof SN60AT intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2008;24:619–25.
  6. Altmann GE, Nichamin LD, Lane SS, Pepose JS. Optical perfor-mance of 3 intraocular lens designs in the presence of decen-tration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:574–85.
  7. Ye PP, Li X, Yao K. Visual outcome and optical quality after bilateral implantation of aspheric diffractive multifocal, as, pheric monofocal and spherical monofocal intraocular lenses: a prospective comparison. Int J Ophthalmol 2013;6:300–6.
  8. Sandoval HP, Fernández de Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD. Comparison of visual outcomes, photopic contrast sen-sitivity, wavefront analysis, and patient satisfaction following cataract extraction and IOL implantation: aspheric vs spherical acrylic lenses. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:1469–75.
  9. Denoyer A, Denoyer L, Halfon J, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ. Com-parative study of aspheric intraocular lenses with negative spherical aberration or no aberration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:496–503.
  10. Trueb PR, Albach C, Montés-Micó R, Ferrer-Blasco T. Visual acu-ity and contrast sensitivity in eyes implanted with aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2009;116:890–5. Alió JL, Piñero DP, Ortiz D, Montalbán R. Clinical outcomes and postoperative intraocular optical quality with a microincision aberration-free aspheric intraocular lens. J Cataract Re-fract Surg 2009;35:1548–54.
  11. Lee KM, Park SH, Joo CK. Comparison of clinical outcomes with three different aspheric intraocular lenses. Acta Ophthal-mol 2011;89:40–6.
  12. Nochez Y, Majzoub S, Pisell