Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

Volatility spillover effect from volatility implied index to emerging markets

Zımni volatilite endeksinden gelişmekte olan piyasalara yönelik volatilite yayılma etkisi

Pages
87–105
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained, the emerging stock markets have leverage effect in conditional variance and emerging bad news concludes that volatility further increases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study has investigated the effect of VIX, created as an implied volatility in the US, on 15 emerging stock markets with the application of GJR-GARCH model.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to the results obtained, the emerging stock markets have leverage effect in conditional variance and emerging bad news concludes that volatility further increases.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of the analysis show that implied volatility index affect Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Chili, Peru, Hungary,Poland, Turkey, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia stock markets through volatility increases.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study has investigated the effect of VIX, created as an implied volatility in the US, on 15 emerging stock markets with the application of GJR-GARCH model. According to the results obtained, the emerging stock markets have leverage effect in conditional variance and emerging bad news concludes that volatility further increases. The results of the analysis show that implied volatility index affect Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Chili, Peru, Hungary,Poland, Turkey, Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia stock markets through volatility increases.

Özet

Bu çalışmada ABD’de zımni volatilite endeksi olarak oluşturulan VIX’in gelişmekte olan 15 ülkenin hisse senedi piyasaları üzerindeki etkisi GJR-GARCH model ile araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, gelişmekte olan ülkelerin hisse senedi piyasalarının koşullu varyansında kaldıraç etkisinin oldu¤u ve piyasaya gelen kötü haberlerin volatiliteyi daha fazla arttırdığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Analiz sonucunda zımni volatilite endeksinin Arjantin, Brezilya, Meksika,Şili, Peru, Macaristan, Polonya, Türkiye, Malezya, Tayland ve Endonezya hisse senedi piyasaları nı etkileyerek volatilitesini arttırdı¤ı belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKMAZ, T., ÇEVİK, E. İ. (2009). Volatility spillover effect from volatility implied index to emerging markets. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 87–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/148107

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abraham, A. ve Seyyed, F. J. (2006). Information Transmission between the Gulf Equity Markets of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. Research in International Business and Finance, 20: 276-285
  2. Aktar, I. (2009). Is There any Comovement between Stock Markets of Turkey, Russia and Hungary? International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 29: 192-200
  3. Alkulaib, Y. A., Najand, M. ve Mashayekh, A. (2007). Dynamic Linkages among Equity Markets in the Middle East and North African Countries. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 19: 43-53
  4. Altinay, G. ve Karagol, E. (2004). Structural Break, Unit Root, and the Causality between Energy Consumption and GDP in Turkey. Energy Economics, 26: 985-994
  5. Altinay, G. ve Karagol, E. (2005). Electricity Consumption and Economic Growth: Evidence from Turkey. Energy Economics, 27: 849-856
  6. Bala, L. ve Premaratne, G. (2003). Stock Market Volatility: Examining North America, Europe and Asia. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_ id=375380 (Erişim Tarihi: 27/03/2009)
  7. Bali, T. G. ve Weinbaum, D. (2007). A Conditional Extreme Value Volatility Estimator Based on High-Frequency Returns. Journal of Economic Dynamics Control, 31: 361-397
  8. Becker, R., Clements, A. E. ve White, S. I. (2007). Does Implied Volatility Provide any Information Beyond that Captured in Model-Based Volatility Forecasts?. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31: 2535-2549
  9. Blair, B., Poon, S-H. ve Taylor, S. J. (2001). Forecasting S&P 100 Volatility: The Incremental Information Content of Implied Volatilities and High-Frequency Index Returns. Journal of Econometrics, 105: 5-26
  10. Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity. Journal of Econometrics. 31: 307-327
  11. Cheung, Y.W. ve Ng, L. K. (1996). A Causality-in-Variance Test and Its Applications to Financial Market Prices. Journal of Econometrics. 72: 33–48
  12. Constantinou, E., Georgiades, R., Kazandjian, A. ve Kouretas, G. P. (2006). Mean and Variance Causality between the Cyprus Stock Exchange and Major Equity Markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 3: 104-119
  13. Egert, B. ve Kocenda, E. (2007). Interdependence between Eastern and Western European Stock Market: Evidence from Intraday Data. Economic Systems, 31: 184-203
  14. Enders, W. (2004). Applied Econometric Time Series. John Wiley&Sons Inc., USA
  15. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Var