Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1

Olumsuz iş çevresi ve Türk imalat sektörü firmalarının yurdışına doğrudan yatırımları

Unfavorable business environment and foreign direct investment activities of Tukish manufacturing firms

Pages
101–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The research results indicate that utility costs, unstable exchange rates, high inflation rate and political instability are considered to be the most important push motives of TMFs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the influence of the home country’s unfavorable business environment on the internationalization of Turkish manufacturing firms (TMFs) via FDI.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study uses cross-sectional survey data from a sample 94 TMFs that have equity investment in 28 countries since the mid 1980s.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The research results indicate that utility costs, unstable exchange rates, high inflation rate and political instability are considered to be the most important push motives of TMFs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the influence of the home country’s unfavorable business environment on the internationalization of Turkish manufacturing firms (TMFs) via FDI. This study uses cross-sectional survey data from a sample 94 TMFs that have equity investment in 28 countries since the mid 1980s. The research results indicate that utility costs, unstable exchange rates, high inflation rate and political instability are considered to be the most important push motives of TMFs. While the relative importance of push motives (i.e., unfavorable business environment) vary with respect to the sampled firm’s ages and, to some extent, their sizes; the motives do not vary based on TMFs’ subsector

Özet

Bu makale, Türkiye’deki olumsuz iş çevresinin Türk imalat sektörü firmalarının doğrudan yurtdışı yatırımlar yoluyla yurtdışına açılmalarındaki etkisini görgül olarak araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Makalede, 1980’lerin ortalarından başlayarak 28 ülkede doğrudan yurtdışı yatırımı olan 94 Türk imalat sektörü firmasından anket tekniğiyle elde edilen veriler kullanılmaktadır. Bu verilerin analizi göstermektedir ki gaz, elektrik ve su maliyeti, döviz kurlarındaki istikrarsızlı k, yüksek enşasyon oranı ve politik istikrarsızlık Türk imalat sektörü firmalarını yurtdışında yatırıma iten önemli faktörlerdendir. Bu faktörlerin göreceli önemi firmaların yaşına ve büyüklüğüne bağlı olarak değişmekte iken; sözü edilen faktörlerin önemi örneklemdeki firmaların alt sektörlerine göre farklılık göstermemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, H. (2009). Olumsuz iş çevresi ve Türk imalat sektörü firmalarının yurdışına doğrudan yatırımları. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 1, 101–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/148101

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Agarwal, J.P. (1985). Intra-LDCs Foreign Direct Investment: A Comparative Analysis of Third World Multinationals. Developing Economies, 23 (3): 236-53
  2. Ajami, R. and BarNiv, R. (1984). Utilizing Economic Indicators in Explaining Foreign Direct Investment in the U.S. Management International Review, 24 (4):16-26
  3. Ajami, R., and Ricks, D.A. (1981). Motives of non-American Firms Investing in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 12 (4): 25-34
  4. Altuner, M. and Demirer, N. (1999). Türkiye’nin 20 Yapısal Sorunu (20 Structural Problems of Turkey), Ekonomik Forum, 6 (3): 55-65
  5. Arpan, J. S., Flowers, E. B. and Ricks, D. A. (1981). Foreign Direct Investment in the United States: The State of Knowledge in Research, Journal of International Business Studies, 12 (Spring/Summer): 137-154
  6. Bugra, A. (1994). State and Business in Modern Turkey a Comparative Study. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press
  7. Bulatov, A. S. (1998). Russian Direct Investment Abroad: Main Motivations in the Post-Soviet Period. Transnational Corporations, 17 (1): 69-82
  8. Cavusgil, S.T., Civi E., Tufek, H. H. and Dalgic, T. (2003). Doing Business in Turkey. Thunderbird International Business Review, 45 (4): 467-479
  9. Chernotsky, H.I. (1987). The American Connection: Motives for Japanese Foreign Direct Investment. Columbia Journal of World Business, Winter: 47-54
  10. Daniels, J.D. (1970). Recent Foreign Direct Manufacturing Investment in the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 1(1): 125-132
  11. Demircan, H. (2003). Dünyada ve Türkiye’de Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Stratejileri (Foreign Direct Investment Strategies in the World and in Turkey). Ankara:T.C. Baflbakanlık Hazine Müsteşarlığı
  12. Dunning, J.H. (1993). Multinational Enterprises and Global Economy. New York: Addison-Westley
  13. Dunning, J.H. (2000). The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity. International Business Review, 9: 163-190
  14. Duran, M.S. (2003). Teflvik Politikaları ve Doğrudan Sermaye Yatırımları (Incentive Policies and Foreign Direct Investment). Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Hazine Müsteşarlığı
  15. Erdal, F. and Tatoglu, E. (2002). Locational Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in an Emerging Market Economy: Evidence from Turkey. Multinational Business Review, 10 (1): 21-27
  16. Erdilek, A. (2003). A Comparative Analysis of Inward and Outward FDI in Turkey. Transnational Corporations, 12 (3):