SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

The Adaptation Study of Personal and Social Responsibility Questionnaire into Turkish Language

Bireysel ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Ölçeği’nin (BSS-Ö) Türk Diline Uyarlanma Çalışması

Bijen FİLİZ
Gıyasettin DEMİRHAN
Pages
51–64
Publication Date
2016-04-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Scale is a reliable and valid tool that may be used in Turkish culture.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to adapt the Questionnaire of Personal and Social Responsibility, developed by Li et al (2008), into Turkish and thus gaining a measure tool for teachers of physical education and sport when they use the model of personal and social responsibility (TPSR) during their courses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Scale was administered to 250 students for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and 210 students for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Scale is a reliable and valid tool that may be used in Turkish culture.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bireysel sorumluluk · sosyal sorumluluk · bireysel ve sosyal sorumluluk modeli

Abstract

The aim of this study is to adapt the Questionnaire of Personal and Social Responsibility, developed by Li et al (2008), into Turkish and thus gaining a measure tool for teachers of physical education and sport when they use the model of personal and social responsibility (TPSR) during their courses. Scale was administered to 250 students for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and 210 students for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The result of analysis showed that there were differences between the factor loadings of original scale of items and this adapted one. The findings of EFA indicated that scale included only one factor and the structure of factor is acceptable. This one factor was named after as “behaviors of responsibility”. Internal consistency coefficient was calculated as .925 concerning reliability. In addition, Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient, calculated for reliability of test-re-test, was determined as significant. The findings of CFA showed that the structure developed in EFA was acceptable. Adapted scale consists of 14 items and in six Likert type. Scale is a reliable and valid tool that may be used in Turkish culture.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, Li ve diğ. (2008) tarafından geliştirilen Bireysel ve Sosyal Sorumluluk Ölçeği’ni Türkçeye uyarlayarak beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin ders uygulamalarında bireysel ve sosyal sorumluluk (BSSÖ) modelini kullanırken değerlendirme yapabilmeleri için bir ölçme aracı elde etmek amaçlanmıştır. Ölçek, açımlayıcı faktör analizi (AFA) için 250 öğrenciye, doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) için 210 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Analizler sonucunda, uyarlanan ölçek maddelerinin faktör boyutundaki dağılımlarında özgün hali ile karşılaştırıldığında farklılık olduğu tespit edilmiştir. AFA’dan elde edilen bulgular, uyarlanan ölçeğin bir faktörden oluştuğunu ve faktör yapısının kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğunu göstermektedir. Uyarlanan ölçeğin bir faktörlü yapısına “sorumluluk davranışları” ismi verilmiştir. Güvenirlik çalışması kapsamında iç tutarlık katsayısı .925 olarak hesaplanmıştır. Test–tekrar test güvenirlik çalışması için hesaplanan Pearson Momentler Çarpımı Korelasyon Katsayısının anlamlı olduğu belirlenmiştir. DFA’dan elde edilen bulgular, AFA’da oluşan yapının kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğunu göstermiştir. Uyarlanan ölçek 14 maddeden oluşmaktadır ve 6’lı Likert tipindedir. Ölçek Türk kültüründe kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir araçtır.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİLİZ, B., DEMİRHAN, G. (2016). The Adaptation Study of Personal and Social Responsibility Questionnaire into Turkish Language. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 51–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/147722

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Anderson, JC, Gerbing DW. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness-of-fit indices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155- 173. Baş T. (2006). Anket. Ankara:
  2. Seçkin Yayıncılık. Baykul Y. (2000). Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme: Klasik Test Teorisi ve Uygulaması. Ankara:
  3. ÖSYM Yayınları.
  4. Bentler PM. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
  5. Brown TA. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
  6. Brownlow C. (2004). SPSS Explained. London: Routledge. Bryman A, Cramer D. (1999). Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS Release 8 for Windows. London and New York: Taylor & Francis e-Library, Routledge. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2002). Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  7. Pegem A. Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JA, Lonczak HS, Hawkins JD. (2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci, 591, 98-124
  8. Cole DA. (1987). Utility of confirmatory factor analysis in test validation research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 1019-1031.
  9. Collingwood T. (1996). Helping at- Risk Youth through Physical Fitness Programming. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Cutforth NJ. (1997). What’s worth doing: Reflections on an after-school program in a Denver elementary school. Quest, 49, 130-139.
  10. Danish SJ, Forneris T, Wallace I. (2005). Sport-based life skills programming in the schools. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 21, 41-62.
  11. DeBusk M, Hellison D. (1989). Implementing a physical education self- responsibility model for delinquencyprone youth. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 8 (2), 104-112.
  12. Erkuş A. (2003). Psikometri Üzerine Yazılar. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği. No:24. Field A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE. Garbarino J. (1997). Educating children in a socially toxic environment. Educational Leadership, 7, 12-16.
  13. Gordon B. (2010). An examination of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school physical education program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 21-37.
  14. Hambleton RK, Bollwark J. (1991). Adapting tests for use in different cultures: Technical issues and methods. Bulletin of the International Testing Commission, 18, 3-32.
  15. Hambleton RK, Kanjee A. (1993). Annual Meetings of the American Educational Research Asso