SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Motivational Regulations in Exercise

Egzersizde Motivasyonel Düzenlemeler ve Dönüşümcü Liderlik İlişkisi

Sinan YILDIRIM
Alper YILDIZ
Ziya KORUÇ
Pages
35–43
Publication Date
2016-04-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, in exercise field the more exercise leaders’ transformational leadership behavior rise, the more participants’ intrinsic regulation and introjected regulation levels rise, yet external regulation and amotivation levels fall.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this the study was to examine the relationships between motivation levels and perceived transformational leadership of regular exercisers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sample was consisted of 276 (131 male, 145 female) participants (Mage= 27.34 +- 10.07 years).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, in exercise field the more exercise leaders’ transformational leadership behavior rise, the more participants’ intrinsic regulation and introjected regulation levels rise, yet external regulation and amotivation levels fall.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Öz belirleme · Motivasyon · Liderlik

Abstract

The purpose of this the study was to examine the relationships between motivation levels and perceived transformational leadership of regular exercisers. Sample was consisted of 276 (131 male, 145 female) participants (Mage= 27.34 +- 10.07 years). Behavioral Regulations in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) was used for determining motivation levels of participants while Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) was used for evaluating perceived transformational leadership of the participants. According to Spearman-Brown Correlation Analysis; transformational leadership was significantly and positively correlated with intrinsic regulation (intrinsic motivation), and introjected regulation. On the other hand, transformational leadership was negatively and significantly correlated with external regulation (extrinsic motivation) and amotivation (p<.05). In conclusion, in exercise field the more exercise leaders’ transformational leadership behavior rise, the more participants’ intrinsic regulation and introjected regulation levels rise, yet external regulation and amotivation levels fall.

Özet

Egzersiz katılımcılarının motivasyon düzenlemeleri ve egzersiz liderine yönelik dönüşümcü liderlik algıları arasındaki ilişkileri incelemek amacıyla yapılan bu çalışmada, araştırma grubu düzenli olarak egzersize katılan 131 erkek, 145 kadın, toplam 276 ( yaş= 27.34 +- 10.07 yıl) bireyden oluşmaktadır. Katılımcıların motivasyon düzeylerini belirlemek için “Egzersizde Davranışsal Düzenlemeler Ölçeği-2” (EDDÖ-2) ve dönüşümcü liderlik algılamalarını değerlendirmek için ise “Çok Faktörlü Liderlik Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Spearman Brown korelasyon analizine göre dönüşümcü liderlik ile içsel düzenleme (içsel motivasyon) ve içe atımla düzenleme arasında pozitif ve anlamlı bir ilişkinin; dönüşümcü liderlik ile egzersizde dışsal düzenleme (dışsal motivasyon) ve güdülenmeme düzeyleri arasında ise negatif ve anlamlı bir ilişkinin olduğunu ortaya koymuştur (p<.05). Sonuç olarak, egzersiz alanında egzersiz liderinin gösterdiği dönüşümcü liderlik davranışı arttıkça katılımcıların içsel düzenleme ve içe atımla düzenleme düzeyleri artmakta, ancak dışsal düzenleme ve güdülenmeme düzeyleri ise azalmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, S., YILDIZ, A., KORUÇ, Z. (2016). Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Motivational Regulations in Exercise. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 35–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/147718

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alpar R. (2012).
  2. Spor, Sağlık ve Eğitim Bilimlerinden Örneklerle Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik (2. basım). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık. s. 333, 346, 456. Baric R, Bucik V. (2009). Motivational differences in athletes trained by coaches of different motivational and leadership profiles. Kinesiology, 41(2), 181-194.
  3. Bass BM. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
  4. Bass BM. (1996). A New Paradigm of Leadership: An İnquiry into Transformational Leadership. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. Virginia. s.4-6. 5. Bass BM. (1997). Does transactional - transformational leadership paradigm transcend organizational and national boundaries? American Psychologist Association İnc., 52(2), 130-139.
  5. Bentler PM. (1990). Comparative fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238– 246. Bono J, Judge TA. (2003). Self-concordance at work: Toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), 554-571.
  6. Browne MW, Cudeck R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. (KA Bol Bollen & JS Long, Eds.), Testing Structural Equation Models (s. 136–162). CA: Sage Publications, s.144. Buluç B. (2009). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin algılarına göre okul müdürlerinin liderlik stilleri ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 15(57), 5-34.
  7. Burns JM. (1978). Leadership. Newyork: Harper & Row Publishers.
  8. Büyüköztürk Ş. (2006). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. (6. basım). Ankara: Pegem Yayıncılık, s. 31, 171. Carpentier J, Mageau GA. (2013). When changeoriented feedback enhances motivation, well-being and performance: A look at autonomy-supportive feedback in sport. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(3), 423- 435. Charbonneau D, Barling J, Kelloway KE. (2001). Transformational leadership and sports performance: The mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(7), 1521–1534.
  9. Deci EL, Ryan RM. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum, s.34, 35, 54. Deci EL, Ryan RM. (1991). A Motivational Approach to Self: Integration in Personality (R. Dienstbier Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Perspectives on motivation, vol.38, s.237-288. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  10. Deci EL, Ryan RM. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human need