Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Metaphoric Conceptualization of Fairplay by Sports Stakeholders

Spor Paydaşlarının Fairplay Kavramına İlişkin Metaforik Algıları

Pages
85–95
Publication Date
2019-09-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Metaphors seem to be an effective tool to comprehend the concept of fairplay

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to examine the mataphoric conceptualization of fairplay by sports stakeholders Participants were 402 individuals from sport related professions such as coach, athlete, instructor, manager, and student.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Quantitative data were reported descriptively. 23 valid metaphors were analyzed by content analysis and 3 conceptual categories were identified.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Metaphors seem to be an effective tool to comprehend the concept of fairplay
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fairplay · spor · metafor

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the mataphoric conceptualization of fairplay by sports stakeholders Participants were 402 individuals from sport related professions such as coach, athlete, instructor, manager, and student. Participants were asked to reveal the single metaphor they had in their minds in terms of the concept of fairplay by the prompt “Fairplay is like ___________ because ________ .” A mixed research design was used in this study. Quantitative data were reported descriptively. 23 valid metaphors were analyzed by content analysis and 3 conceptual categories were identified. The conceptual categories were: “fairplay as a value”, “fairplay as social interaction”, and “fairplay as a right”, respectively. Content analysis revealed that participants mostly used metaphors related to values in life. In addition, there were differences in conceptualization of fairplay according to profession and gender. Metaphors seem to be an effective tool to comprehend the concept of fairplay

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, spor paydaşlarının (antrenör, sporcu, öğretim elemanı, yönetici ve öğrenci) “fairplay” ifadesine ilişkin kavramların, metaforlar aracılığı ile ortaya çıkarılmasıdır. Katılımcılar 402 kişiden oluşmaktadır. Verilerin toplanabilmesi için her katılımcıya “Fairplay ___________ gibidir, çünkü _________ ” cümlesini içeren bilgi formu verilmiş ve akıllarına gelen ilk metaforu gerekçesiyle yazarak boşlukları doldurmaları istenmiştir. Bu araştırmada karma araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Nitel veriler içerik analizi kullanılarak çözümlenmiş, nicel veriler ise betimsel istatistikler kullanılarak sunulmuştur. Elde edilen bulgularına göre katılımcılar 23 adet geçerli metafor üretmişlerdir. Bu metaforlar ortak özellikleri bakımından üç farklı kavramsal kategori altında toplanmıştır. Bunlar sırasıyla: “bir değer olarak fairplay”, “sosyal etkileşim olarak fairplay” ve “bir hak olarak fairplay” kategorileridir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre fairplay ifadesi ile katılımcıların çoğunlukla değerler sisteminde yer alabilecek kavramlar ürettiği sonucu ortaya çıkmıştır. Ayrıca, fairplay ifadesinin uğraşı alanları ve cinsiyetlere göre farklı olarak algılandığı ve buna göre kavramlaştırıldığı belirlenmiştir. Metaforların fairplay kavramını anlamak için etkili bir araç olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNAN, M., DERVENT, F., KARADAĞ, B. (2019). Metaphoric Conceptualization of Fairplay by Sports Stakeholders. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 85–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/147709

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Alpar R. (2006). Spor bilimlerinde uygulamalı istatistik. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım
  2. Bakan Ö. (2013). Türk medyasında kadın sporcuların temsili: Üç gazetenin içerik analizi. Selçuk İletişim Dergisi, 7(4), 129-139
  3. Boixadós M, Cruz J. (1995). Construction of a fairplay attitude scale in soccer. In R. Vanfraechem-Raway & Y. Vanden Auweele (Eds.), Proceedings of the IXth European Congress on Sport Psychology (pp. 4–11). Brusels: FEPSAC
  4. Büyükafşar, M. (2016). Türk Spor Basınında Cinsiyet Ayrımcılığı: Fotomaç ve Fanatik Gazeteleri Örneği. İnsan ve İnsan, 3(9)
  5. Carley K. (1993). Coding choices for textual analysis. A comparison of content analysis and map analysis. Sociological Methodology, 23, 75-126
  6. Clarke L. (2009). Football as a metaphor: Learning to cope with life, manage emotional illness and maintain health through to recovery. Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 16, 488-492.
  7. Creswell JW. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
  8. Cruz J, Boixad´os M, Valiente L, Torregrosa M. (2001). Es perd el “fair play” i l’esportivitat a l’esport en edat escolar Is youth sport losing fairplay and sportpersonship? Apunts. Educaci´o F´ısica i Esports, 64, 6–16
  9. Duriau VJ, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD (2007). A content analysis of the content analysis literature in organization studies: Research themes, data sources, and methodological refinements. Organizational Research Methods, 10(1), 5-34.
  10. Gassner GJ. (1999). Using metaphors for high-performance teaching and coaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 70(7), 33-35
  11. Grossman PL. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. Teachers College Press
  12. Hanin YL, Stambulova NB. (2002). Metaphoric description of performance states: An application of the IZOF model. The Sport Psychologist, 16(4), 396-415
  13. Hardcastle B, Yamamoto K, Parkay FW, Chan J. (1985). Metaphorical views of school: A cross cultural comparison of college students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 1, 309-315.
  14. Huff AS. (1990). Mapping strategic thought. Chichester, NY: John Wiley and Sons
  15. Kellett P. (2002). Football-as-war, coach-as-general: Analogy, metaphor and management implications. Football studies, 5(1), 60-76
  16. Koca C. (2006). Beden eğitimi