SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF 3 X 2 ACHIEVEMENT GOAL MODEL SCALE IN TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS

3 X 2 BAŞARI HEDEF MODELİ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRK LİSANS ÖĞRENCİLERİ İÇİN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI.

Bülent AĞBUĞA
Pages
109–117
Publication Date
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the 3 x 2 model of achievement goals represents an adequate fit to the data (χ2/df =2.60, CFI = 0.95, GFI = 0.91, NNFI = 0.94, and RMSEA = 0.07).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present research is designed to explore the reliability and validity of the 3 x 2 model of achievement goals in School of Sport Sciences and Technology undergraduate students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three hundred and three Turkish undergraduate students (170 males, 133 females; Xage = 21.51 ± 2.27) served as participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the 3 x 2 model of achievement goals represents an adequate fit to the data (χ2/df =2.60, CFI = 0.95, GFI = 0.91, NNFI = 0.94, and RMSEA = 0.07).
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:3 x 2 Başarı Hedef Modeli · Geçerlik · Güvenirlik

Abstract

The present research is designed to explore the reliability and validity of the 3 x 2 model of achievement goals in School of Sport Sciences and Technology undergraduate students. Three hundred and three Turkish undergraduate students (170 males, 133 females; Xage = 21.51 ± 2.27) served as participants. They completed 3 x 2 achievement goal model scale, developed by Elliot et al. (2011), immediately before their final exams. The scale consists of 18 items and each item was rated on a 7-point scale. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was employed to examine and construct the validity of 3 x 2 model of achievement goals. The results showed that the 3 x 2 model of achievement goals represents an adequate fit to the data (χ2/df =2.60, CFI = 0.95, GFI = 0.91, NNFI = 0.94, and RMSEA = 0.07). Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for whole scale, the task-approach, self-approach, otherapproach, task-avoidance, self-avoidance, other-avoidance goals were 0.94, 0.87, 0.78, 0.86, 0.80, 0.78, and 0.91 respectively, indicating acceptable internal consistency. Results from the present study indicate that only the 3 x 2 model of achievement goals provides a reliable and valid measure of achievement goals for Turkish undergraduate students.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı 3 x 2 Başarı Hedef Modeli Ölçeğinin Spor Bilimleri ve Teknolojisi Yüksekokulu öğrencileri için geçerlik ve güvenirliğini saptamaktır. Araştırmaya, toplam 303 (170 erkek ve 133 kadın; Xyaş = 21.51 ± 2.27) Türk üniversite öğrencisi gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Elliot ve diğ. (2011) tarafından geliştirilen 18 maddeli 7’li Likert tipi 3 x 2 Başarı Hedef Modeli Ölçeği öğrencilerin final sınavından hemen önce verilmiştir. Doğrulayıcı faktör analizi sonuçlarına göre tüm değerlerin (χ2/df =2.60, CFI = 0.95, GFI = 0.91, NNFI = 0.94, SRMR = 0.045, ve RMSEA = 0.07) altı faktörlü yapıda tüm değerlerin kabul edilebilir düzeyde olduğu görülmektedir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılığını belirlemede kullanılan Cronbach Alfa değerleri ölçeğin geneli, görev-yaklaşım, öz-yaklaşım, diğer-yaklaşım, görev-kaçınım, öz-kaçınım, diğer-kaçınım alt boyutları için sırasıyla 0.94, 0.87, 0.78, 0.86, 0.80, 0.78, ve 0.91 olarak bulunmuştur. Elde edilen güvenirlik katsayıları ölçeğin yüksek güvenirliğe sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu araştırmanın sonucunda, 3 x 2 Başarı Hedef ModeliÖlçeğinin Spor Bilimleri ve Teknolojisi Yüksekokulu öğrencileri özelinde üniversite öğrencileri düzeyinde kabul edilebilir tatmin edici psikometrik özellikler gösterdiği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AĞBUĞA, B. (2014). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF 3 X 2 ACHIEVEMENT GOAL MODEL SCALE IN TURKISH UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 109–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/147706

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Agbuga, B. (2009). Reliabity and validity of the trichotomous and 2 x 2 achievement goal models in Turkish university physical activity settings. Journal of Human Kinetics, 22, 77-82.
  2. Agbuga B, Xiang P. (2008). Achievement goals and their relations to self-reported persistence/effort in secondary physical education: A trichotomous achievement goal framework. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 179–191.
  3. Agbuga B, Xiang P, McBride R. (2010). Achievement goals and their relations to children’s disruptive behaviors in an after-school physical activity program. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 29, 278-294.
  4. Alpar, R. (2001). Spor Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı İstatistik. Ankara:
  5. Nobel Yayın Dağıtım. Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A cognitivemotivational analysis. (C Ames, R Ames, Eds.), Research on motivation in education. New York, NY: Academic Press. s. 177–207.
  6. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–267.
  7. Ames, C., Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: students’ learning strategies and motivation process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 260-267.
  8. Arbucke, J. L. (2003). Amos 5.0 update to the Amos user’s guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters. Browne, M. W., Gudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. (KA Bollen, JS Long, Eds.), Testing 3 x 2 Başarı Hedef Modeli Ölçeği 117 structure equation models. Newbury Pdiğ, CA: Sage. s. 136–162.
  9. Church, M.A., Elliot, A. J., Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 43–54.
  10. Duda, J. L. (1992). Motivation in sport settings: A goal perspective approach. (GC Roberts, Ed.), Motivation in sport and exercise. Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics. s. 57-92.
  11. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. The American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048.
  12. Dweck, C. S, Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273.
  13. Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. (M L Maehs, PR Pintrich, Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. s. 243-279.
  14. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist