SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN EXTREM SPORLARA İLİŞKİN RİSK VE ÇEKİCİLİK ALGILARI (İNGİLİZCE).

Gıyasettin DEMİRHAN
F. Hülya AŞÇI
Murat KANGALGİL
Osman SARAÇBAŞI
Pages
11–22
Publication Date
2014-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

MANOVA analysis revaled significant differences in perceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sports in terms of gender and participation in extreme sports (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the perceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sports with regard to gender.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group included 1479 female and 1259 male university students.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:MANOVA analysis revaled significant differences in perceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sports in terms of gender and participation in extreme sports (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the perceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sports with regard to gender. The secondary aim of this study was to test the differences in perceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sports between students with experience in these sports and those without experience. “Extreme Sport Risk Perception and Attractiveness Scale”, developed by the researchers, was used to assess university students’ perception of the risk and attractiveness of extreme sports. The study group included 1479 female and 1259 male university students. MANOVA analysis revaled significant differences in perceived risk and attractiveness of extreme sports in terms of gender and participation in extreme sports (p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, extrem sporlarında algılanan çekicilik ve riskin cinsiyete göre incelenmesidir. Çalışmanın ikincil amacı ise, extrem sporları ile uğraşan ve uğraşmayan öğrencilerin extrem sporlarında algıladıkları çekicilik ve risk düzeyleri arasında fark olup olmadığının test edilmesidir. Üniversite öğrencilerinin extrem sporlarına ilişkin çekicilik ve risk algılarını değerlendirmek için araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen, “Extrem Sporları Risk Algısı ve Çekicilik Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Çalışma grubu 1479 bayan 1259 erkek üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. MANOVA analizleri, extrem sporlarına katılım durumu ve cinsiyete göre, extrem sporlarına ilişkin algılanan çekicilik ve algılanan riskin farklılaştığını ortaya koymuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRHAN, G., AŞÇI, F. H., KANGALGİL, M., SARAÇBAŞI, O. (2014). ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN EXTREM SPORLARA İLİŞKİN RİSK VE ÇEKİCİLİK ALGILARI (İNGİLİZCE).. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 11–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/147699

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ewert A. (1989). Risk management in the outdoor HPER setting. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 60, 88-92.
  2. Faulhaber M, Flatz M, Burtscher M. (2007). Frequency of cardiovascular diseases among ski mountaineers in the Austrian Alps. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 28, 78-81.
  3. Fave AD, Bassi M, Massimini F. (2003). Quality of experience and risk perception in high–altitude rock climbing, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15, 82-98
  4. Florenthal B, Shoham A. (2001). The impact of persuasive information on changes in attitude and behavioral intentions toward risky sports for arousal- seeking versus arousal avoidance individuals. Sport Marketing Quarterly,10, 83-95.
  5. Ganzach Y, Ellis S, Pazy A, Siag TR (2008). On the perception and operationalization of risk perception. Judgement and Decision Making, 4, 317–324. 22. Gustafson PE. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: Theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis, 18, 805-811.
  6. Haddock C. (1993). Managing Risks in Outdoor Activities. Wellington: New Zealand Mountain Safety Council, Inc. Horvath P, Zuckerman M. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 41-52.
  7. Kerr J, Vlaminkx J. (1997). Gender differences in the experience of risk. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 293-295.
  8. Kontos AP. (2004). Perceived risk, risk taking, estimation of ability and injury among adolescent sport participants. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 29, 447. Martha C, Sanchez X, Gomà-i-Freixanet M. (2009). Risk perception as a function of risk exposure amongst rock climbers. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 10, 193-200.
  9. Pain MTG, Pain MA. (2005). Essay risk taking in sport. Medicine and Sport, 366, 533-534
  10. Pedersen DM. (1997). Perceptions of high risk sports. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 756- 758. Rossi B, Cereatti L. (1993). The sensation seeking in mountain athletes as assessed by Zuckerman’s sensation seeking scale. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 24, 417-431.
  11. Schneider TA, Butryn TM, Furst DM, Masucci MA. (2007). A Qualitative examination of risk among elite adventure racers. Journal of Sport Behavior, 30, 330- 357. Schrader MP, Wann DL. (1999). High-risk recreation: The relationship between participant characteristics and degree of involvement. Journal of Sport Behavior, 22, 426- 441. Shipside S. (2006). Adventure Sports: 52 Brilliant Ideas For Taking Yourself to The Limit. Oxford: Infinite Ideas Co