Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Blood Flow Restriction Training With Classical Hypertrophy Training in Terms of Muscle Strength and Thickness

Klasik Hipertrofi İle Kan Akışı Sınırlandırılarak Yapılan Antrenmanların Kas Kuvveti Ve Kalınlığı Açısından Karşılaştırılması

Pages
158–167
Publication Date
2020-01-07
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

BFR training has similar results with classical hypertrophy training and may alternatively be used to replace hypertrophy training.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of low intensity strength training with blood flow restriction (BFR) and modarate intensity strength training on elbow flexion strength and muscle thickness. 22 subjects were included in the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Eleven of the subjects practiced moderate intensity (classical hypertrophy, CH) and eleven of the subjects practiced low intensity training with blood flow restriction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:BFR training has similar results with classical hypertrophy training and may alternatively be used to replace hypertrophy training.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:KAS · Hipertrofi antrenmanı · Kan akışı sınırlandırma

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of low intensity strength training with blood flow restriction (BFR) and modarate intensity strength training on elbow flexion strength and muscle thickness. 22 subjects were included in the study. Eleven of the subjects practiced moderate intensity (classical hypertrophy, CH) and eleven of the subjects practiced low intensity training with blood flow restriction. Biceps brachii muscle strength and biceps brachii thickness of the subjects were measured before and after 8 weeks of exercise. Wilcoxon and Mann Whitney U test were used to evaluate the results of the subjects. P values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. At the end of 8 weeks, muscle strength and muscle thickness were increased in both groups (p <0.05). In addition, there was no difference between groups in terms of strength and thickness (p> 0.05). Low intensity strength training with blood flow restriction increased strength and thickness. BFR training has similar results with classical hypertrophy training and may alternatively be used to replace hypertrophy training.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, kan akışı sınırlandırılarak yapılan düşük şiddette kuvvet egzersizleri ve orta şiddetteki kuvvet egzersizlerinin kas kuvveti ve kas kalınlığına etkisini araştırmaktır. Çalışmaya 22 denek katılmıştır. Deneklerin 11’i kan akışı sınırlandırarak (KAS), 11’i klasik hipertrofi (KH) antrenmanı yapmıştır. 8 hafta uygulanan kuvvet egzersizlerinden önce ve sonra deneklerin biseps braki kas kuvveti ve biseps braki kas kalınlığı ölçülmüştür. Katılımcıların sonuçlarını değerlendirmek için Wilcoxon ve Man Whitney U testi kullanılmış, anlamlılık p<0,05 kabul edilmiştir. 8 hafta uygulanan kuvvet antrenmanı sonunda kas kuvveti ve kas kalınlığı her iki grupta da artmış (p<0,05), ayrıca kuvvet ve kalınlık bakımından gruplar arası fark bulunamamıştır (p>0,05). Kan akışı sınırlandırılarak yapılan düşük şiddetteki kuvvet antrenmanı (KAS), kuvveti ve kalınlığını arttırmıştır. KAS antrenmanı klasik hipertrofi (KH) antrenmanı ile benzer sonuçlar vermiştir ve hipertrofi antrenmanına alternatif olarak kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKKOÇ, O., GÖZÜBÜYÜK, Ö. B. (2020). Comparison of Blood Flow Restriction Training With Classical Hypertrophy Training in Terms of Muscle Strength and Thickness. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 158–167. https://ajindex.com/articles/147639

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Abe T, Loenneke JP, Fahs CA, Rossow LM, Thiebaud RS, Bemben MG. (2012). Exercise intensity and muscle hypertrophy in blood flow-restricted limbs and non-restricted muscles: a brief review. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 32, 247–252
  2. American College of Sport Medicine. (2002). Position stand: progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sport Exercs, 3, 364-380
  3. American College of Sports Medicine. (2009). American college of sports medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 41, 687-708
  4. Baikoglu, S, Kaldirimci M. (2019). Effect of ıschemıc pre-condıtıonıng on lactate and anaerobıc performance. Acta Medica Mediterranea, 35(1), 159-164
  5. Centner C, Wiegel P, Gollhofer A, König D. (2019). Effects of blood flow restriction training on muscular strength and hypertrophy in older individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Medicine, 49(1), 95-108
  6. Fahs CA, Loenneke JP, Rossow LM, Thiebaud RS, Bemben MG. (2012). Methodological considerations for blood flow restricted resistance exercise. J Trainol, 1(1), 14-22 7. Fleck SJ, Kreamer WJ. (1997). Designing Resistance Training Programs (2nd ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
  7. Folland JP, Williams AG. (2007). The adaptations to strength training: morphological and neurological contributions to increased strength. Sports Med, 37,145-168
  8. Goto K, Ishii N, Kizuka T, Takamatsu K. (2005). The impact of metabolic stress on hormonal responses and muscular adaptations. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 37, 955-963
  9. Gozubuyuk OB, Tahirbegolli B, Akkoc O, Akman M, Bayraktar B. (2016). The reliability of ultrasonographic measurement of biceps brachii muscle thickness and stiffness. In Acta Physıologıca, Vol. 218, pp. 45-46
  10. Karabulut M, Abe T, Sato Y, Bemben MG. (2010). The effects of lowintensity resistance training with vascular restriction on leg muscle strength in older men. Eur J Appl Physiol, 108, 147-155
  11. Kim D, Loenneke Jp, Ye X, Bemben Da. (2017). Low-load resıstance traınıng wıth low relatıve pressure produces muscular changes sımılar to hıgh-load resıstance traınıng. Muscle Nerve, 56, E126-E133
  12. Kraemer WJ, Adams K, Cafarelli E, Dudley GA, Dooly C, Feigenbaum MS ve diğ. (2002). American college of sports medicine position stand. progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 34(2), 364-380
  13. Kraemer WJ, Ratamess NA. (2004) Fundamentals of resistance tra