Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4

Women Boxers: Keeping The Gloves On In and Out of The Boxing Ring

Kadın Boksörler: Boks Ringinde ve Ringin Dışında Sürekli Eldiven Giymek

Pages
136–153
Publication Date
2016-05-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We used the Bourdieu’s theory of action (1977) to analyse the boxing as a field and social constructivist gender approach (Connell, 1987; West and Zimmerman, 1987) to analyse the women’s gendered experiences and gender relations.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this phenomenological study, we aim to understand how women boxers are marginalized and their strategies to survive in the boxing field identified with masculinity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Women employed various strategies to survive within the field as well as to remain feminine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We used the Bourdieu’s theory of action (1977) to analyse the boxing as a field and social constructivist gender approach (Connell, 1987; West and Zimmerman, 1987) to analyse the women’s gendered experiences and gender relations.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Toplumsal Cinsiyet · Boks · Bourdieu

Abstract

In this phenomenological study, we aim to understand how women boxers are marginalized and their strategies to survive in the boxing field identified with masculinity. We collected the data from eleven women boxers with in-depth individual interviews and observations in different boxing gyms. We analysed the raw data with content analysis. Findings showed that boxing field is a gendered field which is overwhelmingly dominated by men. Women boxers are frequently marginalized both in and out of boxing field. Women employed various strategies to survive within the field as well as to remain feminine. We used the Bourdieu’s theory of action (1977) to analyse the boxing as a field and social constructivist gender approach (Connell, 1987; West and Zimmerman, 1987) to analyse the women’s gendered experiences and gender relations.

Özet

Bu araştırmada amacımız, tarihsel olarak erkeklikle özdeşleştirilen boks alanında kadınların nasıl ötekileştirildiklerini ve kadın boksörlerin bu alanda var olma stratejilerini incelemektir. Araştırmamızda fenomenoloji yöntemini kullandık. On bir kadın boksörle yapılan bireysel görüşmeler ve çeşitli spor salonlarındaki gözlemler yoluyla topladığımız verilerimizi içerik analizi yöntemiyle analiz ettik. Araştırma bulguları boks alanının baskın şekilde erkek hâkimiyetinde olan toplumsal cinsiyetlendirilmiş bir alan olduğunu, kadınların hem boks alanında hem de boks alanının dışında ötekileştirildiğini ve kadın boksörlerin alanda varlık gösterebilmek ve aynı zamanda kadın kalabilmek için çeşitli stratejiler geliştirdiklerini göstermektedir. Boks alanını, Bourdieu’nün eylem kuramı (1977) çerçevesinde bir alan olarak analiz ederken, kadın boksörlerin alandaki toplumsal cinsiyetlendirilmiş deneyimlerini cinsiyet ilişkilerini toplumsal bir yapı/eylem olarak ele alan sosyal inşacı toplumsal cinsiyet yaklaşımı (Connell, 1987; West ve Zimmerman, 1987) bağlamında tartıştık.

🔖

Cite This Article

EMİR, E., KARAÇAM, M., KOCA, C. (2016). Women Boxers: Keeping The Gloves On In and Out of The Boxing Ring. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 4, 136–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/147635

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Allan K. (2006). Contemporary Social and Sociological Theory, Visualizing Social Worlds. Thousand Oaks. California: Pine Forge Press.
  2. Bourdieu P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Bourdieu P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. (J Richardson, Ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. s. 241-258. New York: Greenwood Press.
  4. Bourdieu P. (1993). Sociology in Question. London: Sage Publications. Bourdieu P, Wacquant LJD. (2003). Düşünümsel Bir Antropoloji İçin Cevaplar. İstanbul:
  5. İletişim Yayınları.
  6. Brake DL. (2013). Wrestling with gender: Constructing masculinity by refusing to wrestle women. Nevada Law Journal, 13, 486–532.
  7. Brown D. (2006). Pierre Bourdieu’s “Masculine Domination” thesis and the gendered body in sport and physical culture. Sociology of Sport Journal, 23(2), 162– 188. Connell RW. (1987).
  8. Gender and power. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  9. Connell RW. (1995).
  10. Masculinities. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  11. Connell RW. (2009). Gender in World Perspective. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  12. Creswell JW. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd Edition) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. GSB (T.C. Gençlik ve Spor Bakanlığı). (2015). Federasyonlara Göre Lisanslı ve Sezon Sonu İtibariyle Faal Sporcu Sayıları. 08.12.2015, http://sgm.gsb.gov.tr/ Sayfalar/175/105/Istatistikler Halbert C. (1997). Tough enough and women enough: Stereotypes, discrimination, and impression management among women professional boxers. Journal of Sport & Social Issues, 21(1), 7-36.
  13. Hargreaves J. (1997). Women’s boxing and related activities: Introducing images and meanings. Body and Society, 3(4), 33-49. IOC (International Olympic Committee). (2015). Olympic Charter, 25.12.2015, http://www.olympic.org/ Documents/olympic_charter_en.pdf. Karaçam MŞ, Öztürk P, Koca C. (2013). International Association of Physical Education and Sport for Girls and Women (IAPESGW) 17th World Congress: Turkish girls’ and boys’ perceptions of gender appropriateness of sports. Havana, Cuba. Kay J, Laberge S. (2002). The ‘new’ corporate habitus in adventure racing. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 37(1), 17–36.
  14. Koca C. (2011). Gençlik ve Spor Genel Müdürlüğü ve Türkiye Milli Olimpiyat Komitesinin Toplumsal Cinsiyet Yaklaşımıyla İncelenmesi, Proje No: 109K358, Ankara.
  15. Koca C, Bulgu N. (2005). Spor ve toplumsal cinsiyet: genel bir bakış. Toplum ve Bilim, 103, 163-184.
  16. Koca C, Demirhan G. (2005). Beden e