SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2

Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*

Filiz Akbaş Yeşilyurt(PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-1629-4747
Ensar Yeşilyurt(PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5610-3146
Pages
91–99
Publication Date
2020-04-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Like other industrial/ sector data sets, the main problem for arms data sets is revisions of industrial classifications, which prevent the creation of long time series.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Even though there are a range of useful sources on defence economics data, only some of them are used widely.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main sources of export, import and output data sets are Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers-US Department of State (WMEAT), European Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) and United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) while SIPRI and WMEAT are for military expenditures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Like other industrial/ sector data sets, the main problem for arms data sets is revisions of industrial classifications, which prevent the creation of long time series.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Arms data set issues · Arms data set issues

Abstract

Even though there are a range of useful sources on defence economics data, only some of them are used widely. The main sources of export, import and output data sets are Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers-US Department of State (WMEAT), European Statistical Office (EUROSTAT) and United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) while SIPRI and WMEAT are for military expenditures. This paper discusses the main features and similarities of data sets from the various sources. Like other industrial/ sector data sets, the main problem for arms data sets is revisions of industrial classifications, which prevent the creation of long time series.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yeşilyurt, F. A., Yeşilyurt, E. (2020). Non-standard Sources for Arms Production and Arms Trade Data*. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 2, 91–99. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.729540

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Da Silva, D. L. (2018), Filling Arms Production Data Gaps: South America as a Case in Point, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 19-25
  2. Fleurant, A and Tian, N. (2018), SIPRI’s Arms Producing and Military Services Companies Database, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal, 13 (2): 5-10 Hartley, K. (2018), Arms industry Data: Knowns and Unknowns, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 30-35
  3. http://data.un.org/Data.aspx?d=WDI&f=Indicator_Code%3AMS.MIL.XPND.GD.ZS
  4. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/prodcom/data/ excel-files-nace-rev.2
  5. https://stat.unido.org/
  6. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-worldfactbook/rankorder/2034rank.html
  7. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/ pdf_2017_06/20170629_170629-pr2017-111-en.pdf https://www.state.gov/t/avc/rls/rpt/wmeat/
  8. Kinsella, D. (2000), Arms production in the third tier: An Analysis of Opportunity and Willingness, International Interactions, 26: 3, 253-286
  9. Perlo-Freeman, S. (2018), Arms, Corruption, and the State: Understanding the Role of Arms Trade Corruption in Power Politics, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 36-46 SIPRI.org
  10. Smith, R. and Dunne, J. P. (2018), Issues in the Quantitative Analysis of the SIPRI Arms Industry Database, Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 11-18
  11. Wulf, H. (2018), Analysis of SIPRI’s Arms Production Data: Some Suggestions for Expansion, The Economics of Peace and Security Journal 13 (2): 26-29
  12. Yesilyurt F., Guloglu B., Yesilyurt M. E. and Sezgin Ş. (2014), The Determinants of Arms Production, Defence and Peace Economics, 25 (2): 205-211