SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

Comparative Analysis of Factors Affecting Employee Performance According to Job Performance Measurement Method: The Case of Performing Artists

Volkan Aşkun(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2746-502X
Rabia Çizel(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6381-2503
Edina Ajanovıc(AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1718-2862
Pages
29–45
Publication Date
2021-01-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results show there is a difference between variables explaining the job performance of the employees when they do self-evaluation of their own performance than when the same is done by their supervisors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There are many factors that may affect employees’ job performance such as psychological, sociological, anthropological, demographic and similar.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, related literature was mainly focusing on psychological and demographic ones, which were often analyzed through different job performance measurement methods such as self-evaluation and supervisor (or superior) evaluation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results show there is a difference between variables explaining the job performance of the employees when they do self-evaluation of their own performance than when the same is done by their supervisors.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Individual job performance · personality traits · demographic variables

Abstract

There are many factors that may affect employees’ job performance such as psychological, sociological, anthropological, demographic and similar. However, related literature was mainly focusing on psychological and demographic ones, which were often analyzed through different job performance measurement methods such as self-evaluation and supervisor (or superior) evaluation. The main goal of the current study is to define and compare the factors affecting employee’s job performance according to the above mentioned measurement methods, as well as their level of importance. For the purpose of this study, data were collected through survey conducted in the Antalya region in Turkey among 305 participants coming from seven countries and consisting of both employees and supervisors working for a performing artists organization company. Data were analyzed by using CHAID analysis through classification algorithms. Results show there is a difference between variables explaining the job performance of the employees when they do self-evaluation of their own performance than when the same is done by their supervisors. Nationality is one of the factors affecting performance in both evaluation forms. While the performance of individuals with extraversion personality traits was high in case of self-evaluation, the performance of the men who were second-born or after was high in the evaluation by the supervisors. These results demonstrated the problematic nature of measuring job performance and making accurate evaluations based on it.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aşkun, V., Çizel, R., Ajanovıc, E. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Factors Affecting Employee Performance According to Job Performance Measurement Method: The Case of Performing Artists. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 29–45. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.874012

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (70)

  1. Aboagye, A. K., Dai, B., & Bakpa, E. K. (2020). The effect of risk communication on the nurses’ task and contextual performance in disease outbreak control in Ghana: Application of the cause model. International Journal of Health Planning and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.2978
  2. Abubakar, T., Pangil, F., & Othman, S. Z. (2016). Examining the link between HRM Practices and Employees’ performance in Nigerian public sector. Management Science Letters, 6, 395–408. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2016.4.006
  3. Akca, M., & Yurtçu, B. G. (2017). Çalışma ortamı özelliklerinin hekimlerin görev ve bağlamsal performansına etkisi. International Journal of Academic Value Studies, 3(15), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.23929/javs.562
  4. Aksu, G., & Güzeller, C. O. (2016). Classification of PISA 2012 mathematical literacy scores using Decision-Tree Method: Turkey sampling. Egitim ve Bilim, 41(185), 101–122. https:// doi.org/10.15390/EB.2016.4766
  5. Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E. C., Rees, C., & Gatenby, M. (2013). The relationship between line manager behavior, perceived HRM practices, and individual performance: Examining the mediating role of engagement. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 839–859. https://doi.org/10.1002/ hrm.21512
  6. Ali-Hassan, H., Nevo, D., & Wade, M. (2015). Linking dimensions of social media use to job performance: The role of social capital. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(2), 65–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2015.03.001
  7. Allen, H. (2008). Using routinely collected data to augment the management of health and productivity loss. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 50(6), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e31817b610c
  8. Allport, G. W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023295 Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., Akert, R. M., & Sommers, S. R. (2016). Social Psychology (9th ed.). London: Pearson Education.
  9. Barclay, K. J. (2015). Birth order and educational attainment: Evidence from fully adopted sibling groups. Intelligence, 48, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2014.10.009 Barrick, M. R., Mount, M. K., & Strauss, J. P. (1993). Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting. Journal of Ap, 78(5), 715–722.
  10. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021- 9010.85.3.349
  11. Blickle, G. (1996). Personality traits, learning strategies, and performance. European Journal of Personality, 10(5), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984
  12. Bonesrønning, H., & Massih, S. S. (2011). Birth order effects on young students’ academic achievement. Journal of Socio- Economics, 40(6), 824–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. socec.2011.08.010
  13. Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain To include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. C. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  14. Bracken, D. W., Rose, D. S., & Church, A. H. (2016). The evolution and devolution of 360° feedback. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(4), 761–794. https://doi.org/10.1017/ iop.2016.93
  15. Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710. https://doi.org/10.2307/258391
  16. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 687–732). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  17. Campbell, J. P., McHenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43(2), 313–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990. tb01561.x
  18. Cattell, R. (1979). Personality and learning theory. Vol. 1: The structure of personality in its environment. New York, NY: Springer.
  19. Ceschi, A., Sartori, R., Dickert, S., & Costantini, A. (2016). Grit or honesty-humility? New insights into the moderating role of personality between the health impairment process and counterproductive work behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1799), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01799
  20. Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(4), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0092-6566(02)00578-0
  21. Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (1997). Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance, 10(4), 331–360. https://doi.org/10.1207/ s15327043hup1004_2
  22. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1988). Personality in adulthood: A six-year longitudinal study of self-reports and spouse ratings on the NEO Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 853–863. https://doi. org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.853
  23. Craik, K. H. (1993). Fifty years of personality psychology. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  24. Dåderman, A. M., Ingelgård, A., & Koopmans, L. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation, from Dutch to Swedish language, of the individual work performance questionnaire. Work, 65(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-193062
  25. Demirok, A. (2018). Örgütsel sinizm ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişki: Diyarbakır’da çalışan kadrolu ve sözleşmeli personel örneği(Unpublished master’s thesis). Türk Hava Kurumu Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  26. Diab, D. L., & Hazer, J. T. (2012). Effect of rater nationality on the relationships among ratee task, contextual, and counterproductive behaviors and salary estimates. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 20(3), 359–375. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2012.00606.x
  27. Escorpizo, R. (2008). Understanding work productivity and its application to work-related musculoskeletal disorders. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(3–4), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.10.018 Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas.
  28. Fayers, P. M., & Hand, D. J. (2002). Causal variables, indicator variables and measurement scales: an example from quality of life. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 165(2), 233–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985X.02020
  29. Francis, L. J., Brown, L. B., & Philipchalk, R. (1992). The development of an abbreviated form of the revised Eysenck personality questionnaire (EPQR-A): Its use among students in England, Canada, the U.S.A. and Australia. Personality and Individual Differences, 13(4), 443–449. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(92)90073-X
  30. Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: their nature and nurture. London: Macmillan.
  31. Gliner, J. A., Morgan, G. A., & L, L. N. (2017). Research methods in applied settings: An integrated approach to design and analysis. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  32. Gözel, G., Atmaca, G. D., & Durat, G. (2017). Hemşirelerin kişilik özellikleri ile iş performansları arasındaki ilişkinin değerlendirilmesi. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(1), 11–16.
  33. Harris, M. M., & Schaubroeck, J. (1988). A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 43–62. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00631.x
  34. Hashmi, F., Ameen, K., & Soroya, S. (2019). Does post graduate degree make any difference in job performance of information professionals? Library Management, 41(1), 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-07-2019-0042
  35. Heidemeier, H., & Moser, K. (2009). Self–other agreement in job performance ratings: A meta-analytic test of a process model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.94.2.353
  36. Hertwig, R., Davis, J. N., & Sulloway, F. J. (2002). Parental investment: How an equity motive can produce inequality. Psychological Bulletin, 128(5), 728–745. https://doi. org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.5.728
  37. Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Rev. 3rd). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  38. Horner, S. B., Fireman, G. D., & Wang, E. W. (2010). The relation of student behavior, peer status, race, and gender to decisions about school discipline using CHAID decision trees and regression modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48(2), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2009.12.001
  39. Iacovou, M. (2008). Family size, birth order, and educational attainment. Marriage and Family Review, 42(3), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v42n03_03
  40. Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
  41. Karancı, N., Dirik, G., & Yorulmaz, O. (2007). Eysenck kişilik anketi-gözden geçirilmiş kısaltılmış formunun (EKA-GGK) Türkiyede geçerlik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18(3), 254–261.
  42. Keleş, K. (2017). Etkileşimci ve dönüşümcü liderliğin işten ayrılma niyeti ve iş performansına etkisi(Unpublished master’s thesis). Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Sivas.
  43. Koopmans, L. (2014). Measuring individual work performance. Zutphen: CPI Koninklijke Wöhrmann.
  44. Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C., Hildebrandt, V., Van Buuren, S., Van Der Beek, A. J., & de Vet, H. C. w. (2012). Development of an individual work performance questionnaire. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401311285273
  45. Lunenburg, F. C. (2012). Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity, 14(1), 1–8.
  46. Mael, F. A., O’Shea, P. G., Smith, M. A., Burling, A. S., Carman, K. L., Haas, A., & Rogers, K. S. (2010). Development of a model and measure of process-oriented quality of care for substance abuse treatment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research, 37(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11414-009-9180-4
  47. Maltby, J., Talley, M., Cooper, C., & Leslie, J. C. (1995). Personality effects in personal and public orientations toward religion. Personality and Individual Differences, 19(2), 157–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(95)00036-6
  48. Metin, U. B., Peeters, M. C. W., & Taris, T. W. (2018). Correlates of procrastination and performance at work: The role of having “good fit.” Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community, 46(3), 228–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/1085 2352.2018.1470187
  49. Motowidlo, S. J., & Van Scotter, J. R. (1994). Evidence that task performance can be distinguished from contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.475
  50. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43.
  51. Nadatien, I., Handoyo, S., Pudjirahardjo, W. J., & Probowati, Y. (2019). The influence of organizational pride on the performance of lecturers in health at the Nahdlatul Ulama university in Surabaya. Indian Journal of Public Health Research and Development, 10(1), 538–542. https://doi. org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.00105.0
  52. Pallegama, R. W., Ariyasinghe, S., & Perera, H. A. D. (2007). Influence of personality traits on the attitudes towards the teaching program and the academic performance of dental undergraduate. Proceedings of the Peradeniya University Research Sessions, 12(1), 126–127.
  53. Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2011). Organizational behavior: Tools for success. Natorp Boulevard: South-Western Cengage Learning.
  54. Podsakoff, P. M., & S.B., M. (1989). A second generation measure of organizational citizenship behavior. Bloomington: Indiana University.
  55. Poropat, A. E. (2011). The Eysenckian personality factors and their correlations with academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 41–58. https:// doi.org/10.1348/000709910X497671
  56. Price, J. (2008). Parent-child quality time: Does birth order matter? Journal of Human Resources, 43(1), 240–265. https:// doi.org/10.3368/jhr.43.1.240
  57. Rothmann, S., & Coetzer, E. P. (2003). The big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip. v29i1.88
  58. Sato, T. (2005). The Eysenck personality questionnaire brief version: Factor structure and reliability. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 139(6), 545–552. https://doi. org/10.3200/JRLP.139.6.545-552
  59. Schultz, D. P., & Schultz, S. E. (2017). Theories of personality (11th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
  60. Sekiguchi, T., Bebenroth, R., & Li, D. (2011). Nationality background of MNC affiliates’ top management and affiliate performance in Japan: knowledge-based and upper echelons perspectives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(5), 999–1016. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/09585192.2011.556774
  61. Sinclair, R. R., & Tucker, J. S. (2006). Stress-CARE: An integrated model of individual differences in soldier performance under stress. In A. Adler, T. Britt, & C. Castro (Eds.), Military life: The psychology of serving in peace and combat: Vol. 1 military performance (pp. 202–231). Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
  62. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. (1983). Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. In Journal of Applied Psychology (Vol. 68).
  63. Tett, R. P., Guterman, H. A., Bleier, A., & Murphy, P. J. (2000). Development and content validation of a “hyperdimensional” taxonomy of managerial competence. Human Performance, 13(3), 205–251. https://doi.org/10.1207/ S15327043HUP1303_1
  64. Thorndike, R. L. (1949). Personnel selection: Test and measurement techniques. New York, NY: Wiley. Turkish Hoteliers Federation – TUROFED (2019). Toursim Report. 2019/1 https://www.turofed.org.tr/_files/_pdf/ RAPOR/turofed-turizm-raporu-2019.pdf
  65. Uppal, N. (2014). Moderation effects of job characteristics on the relationship between neuroticism and job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 22(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12087
  66. Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525
  67. Viswesvaran, C. (2002). Assessment of individual job performance: A review of the past century and a look ahead. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizationalpsychology, Volume 1: Personnel psychology. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  68. Viswesvaran, Chockalingam, & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216–226. https://doi. org/10.1111/1468-2389.00151
  69. Yeşilyaprak, B. (2012). Mesleki rehberlik ve kariyer danışmanlığı kurumdan uygulamaya. Ankara: Pegem Akademi
  70. Zhao, S., Liu, Y., & Zhou, L. (2020). How does a boundaryless mindset enhance expatriate job performance? The mediating role of proactive resource acquisition tactics and the moderating role of behavioural cultural intelligence. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(10), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.20 16.1253033