SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3

FROM CYBERPUNK TO CYPHERPUNK: THE TECHNICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL ROOTS OF BITCOIN

Ramazan Bektaş(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7672-6711
Kerim Eser Afşar(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9853-0186
Ahmet Aydın Arı(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7177-5116
Pages
495–510
Publication Date
2025-08-06
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings reveal that while cryptographic research influenced Bitcoin's technical evolution, ideological discussions were relatively less significant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cryptocurrencies initially gained prominence by eliminating intermediaries in payment systems and later found applications in various business sectors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bitcoin's emergence is technically dated to 2008.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings reveal that while cryptographic research influenced Bitcoin's technical evolution, ideological discussions were relatively less significant.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bitcointalk · Bitcoin · Ideology

Abstract

Cryptocurrencies initially gained prominence by eliminating intermediaries in payment systems and later found applications in various business sectors. The crypto network, pioneered by Bitcoin, has spurred new business forms and organizational structures with diverse motivations. Bitcoin's emergence is technically dated to 2008. However, its ideological and technical roots trace back to the cyberpunk literature of the late 1970s and the cypherpunk movement that began in California in 1992. The cypherpunk manifestos significantly influenced cryptographic work, shaping Bitcoin's technical foundation. This study aims to explore Bitcoin's ideological origins through a qualitative content analysis of cypherpunk manifestos, Nakamoto's posts on the "Bitcointalk" forum, and "Cryptography Mailing List" correspondence. By examining these sources, the study identifies the historical dimensions of Bitcoin's technical structure and highlights the impact of ideological debates on its development. Findings reveal that while cryptographic research influenced Bitcoin's technical evolution, ideological discussions were relatively less significant. Nonetheless, Bitcoin's developers, particularly Nakamoto, incorporated a strong ideological emphasis on "privacy" despite the primary technical focus.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bektaş, R., Afşar, K. E., Arı, A. A. (2025). FROM CYBERPUNK TO CYPHERPUNK: THE TECHNICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL ROOTS OF BITCOIN. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 495–510. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20250303

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (75)

  1. Akman, K. & Övgün, B. (2022). Devletin Gölgesinde Dijitalleşmenin Dönüştürdüğü Mahremiyet. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 55(1), 35-61.
  2. Applegate, M. (2012). Virtuality and resistance: situating the manifesto between command and political metamorphosis. Borderlands e-journal, 11(3). https://digitalcommons.molloy.edu/dhnm_fac/5
  3. Appukuttan Nair, D. (2018). The bitcoin innovation, crypto currencies and the Leviathan. Innovation and Development, 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2018.1502249.
  4. Arnhart, L. (2018). Friedrich Hayek’in Darwinci Muhafazakârlığı. Çev. Koç, A.K. Liberal Düşünce, 90, 147-168.
  5. Arslanian, H. & Fischer, F. (2019). The Future of Finance: The Impact of FinTech, AI, and Crypto on Financial Services. Cham: Springer.
  6. Atzori, M. (2015). Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: Is the state still necessary? http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2709713
  7. Barbrook, R. & Cameron, A. (1996). The Californian ideology. Science as Culture, 6(1), 44-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505439609526455
  8. Bartlett, J. (2016). Cypherpunks Write Code. [Review of The Dark Net: Inside the Digital Underworld, by J. Bartlett]. American Scientist, 104(2), 120–123. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44808884
  9. Beltramini, E. (2020). Against technocratic authoritarianism. A short intellectual history of the cypherpunk movement. Internet Histories, 5(2), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2020.1731249
  10. Bertelloni, M. B. (1998). The cypherpunk vision of techno-politics. St. Anne’s Academic Review, 1, 1-6.
  11. Brekke, J. K. (2020). Hacker-engineers and Their Economies: The Political Economy of Decentralised Networks and ‘Cryptoeconomics’. New Political Economy, 26(4), 646–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2020.1806223
  12. Caliskan, K. (2020). Data money: The socio-technical infrastructure of cryptocurrency blockchains. Economy and Society, 49(4), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2020.1774258
  13. Chohan, U. W. (2017). Cryptoanarchism and cryptocurrencies. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3079241
  14. Chohan, U. W. (2022). A History of Bitcoin. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3047875.
  15. Corradi, F. & Höfner, P. (2018). The disenchantment of Bitcoin: unveiling the myth of a digital currency. International Review of Sociology, 28(1), 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2018.1430067
  16. Dahlberg, L. (2017). Cyberlibertarianism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.70
  17. Dallyn, S. (2017). Cryptocurrencies as market singularities: the strange case of Bitcoin. Journal of Cultural Economy, 10(5), 462-473. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2017.1315541
  18. De Filippi, P. (2014). Bitcoin: A Regulatory Nightmare to a Libertarian Dream. Internet Policy Review, 3(2). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2468695
  19. Deleuze, G. (1992). Denetim Toplumları Konusunda Bir Ek. Çev. Baker, U. “Sociétés de controle”. L’Autre Journal. https://birikimdergisi.com/dergiler/birikim/1/sayi-142-143-subat-mart-2001/2334/denetim-toplumlari-konusunda-bir-ek/4382
  20. Dodd, N. (2018). The social life of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 35(3), 35-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276417746464
  21. Doria, L. (2020). The Cybernetic Ethos of Cryptocurrencies: Economic and Social Dimensions. Partecipazione & Conflitto, 13(1), 384-408. https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v13i1p384
  22. Dos Santos, R. P. (2017). On the philosophy of Bitcoin/Blockchain technology: Is it a chaotic, complex system? Metaphilosophy, 48(5), 620-633. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/meta.12266
  23. Dostov, V. & Shoust, P. (2014). Cryptocurrencies: an unconventional challenge to the AML/CFT regulators? Journal of Financial Crime, 21(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2013-0043
  24. Dow, S. (2019). Monetary Reform, Central Banks, and Digital Currencies. International Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2019.1624317
  25. DuPont, Q. (2014). The Politics of Cryptography: Bitcoin and the Ordering Machines. The Journal of Peer Production, 1(4), 1-29. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2692645
  26. Duque, J. J. (2020). State involvement in cryptocurrencies. A potential world money? The Japanese Political Economy, 46(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/2329194X.2020.1763185
  27. Easterbrook, N. (1992). The Arc of Our Destruction: Reversal and Erasure in Cyberpunk. Science Fiction Studies, 19(3), 378–394. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4240184
  28. Edwards, P.N. (1994), Cyberpunks in cyberspace: the politics of subjectivity in the computer age. The Sociological Review, 42(S1), 69-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1994.tb03410.x
  29. Elo, S. & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
  30. Faustino, S., Faria, I. & Marques, R. (2021). The myths and legends of king Satoshi and the knights of blockchain. Journal of Cultural Economy, 15(1), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2021.1921830
  31. Golumbia, D. (2013). Cyberlibertarianism: The extremist foundations of ‘digital freedom’. Clemson University Department of English (September). http://www. uncomputing. org.
  32. Golumbia, D. (2015). Bitcoin as politics: Distributed right-wing extremism. In: Lovink, G., Tkacz, N., and de Vries, P. (eds), MoneyLab Reader: An Intervention in Digital Economy (117-131). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
  33. Hayes, A. (2019). The Socio-Technological Lives of Bitcoin. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(4), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419826218
  34. Heister, S. & Yuthas, K. (2020). The blockchain and how it can influence conceptions of the self. Technology in Society, 60, 101218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101218
  35. Hellegren, Z. I. (2017). A history of crypto-discourse: encryption as a site of struggles to define internet freedom. Internet Histories, 1(4), 285–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2017.1387466
  36. Herian, R. (2018). Blockchain and the distributed reproduction of capitalist class power. In: Lovink, G., Gloerich, I., and De Vries, P., (eds.) MoneyLab Reader 2: Overcoming the Hype (43-51). Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures.
  37. http://satoshinakamoto.me/source/cryptography-mail-list/?order=asc
  38. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3
  39. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=20
  40. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=0
  41. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=280
  42. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts
  43. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3;sa=showPosts;start=520
  44. https://dyor-crypto.fandom.com/wiki/James_A._Donald
  45. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/finney/rpow/
  46. Hughes, E. (1993). A cypherpunk’s manifesto. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/cypherpunk-manifesto/
  47. Hütten, M. (2019). The soft spot of hard code: Blockchain technology, network governance and pitfalls of technological utopianism. Global Networks, 19(3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.1111/glob.12217
  48. Inwood, O. & Zappavigna, M. (2021). Ideology, attitudinal positioning, and the blockchain: a social semiotic approach to understanding the values construed in the whitepapers of blockchain start-ups. Social Semiotics, 33(1), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2021.1877995
  49. Jansen, M. A. (2012). Bitcoin: The Political ‘Virtual’ of an Intangible Material Currency. International Journal of Community Currency Research, 17(A), 8-18.
  50. Jarvis, C. (2021). Cypherpunk ideology: objectives, profiles, and influences (1992–1998). Internet Histories, 6(3), 315–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2021.1935547
  51. Jones, S. (1994). Hyper-punk: Cyberpunk and Information Technology. The Journal of Popular Culture, 28(2), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0022-3840.1994.2802_81.x
  52. Karlstrøm, H. (2014). Do libertarians dream of electric coins? The material embeddedness of Bitcoin. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15(1), 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1600910X.2013.870083
  53. Kuckartz, U. (2019). Qualitative Text Analysis: A Systematic Approach. In: Kaiser, G. & Presmeg, N. (eds) Compendium for Early Career Researchers in Mathematics Education. ICME-13 Monographs (181-197). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15636-7_8
  54. Ma, J., Gans, J. S. & Tourky, R. (2018). Market structure in bitcoin mining. NBER Working Paper No. w24242. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  55. Mackensen, K. & Wille, U. (1999). Qualitative text analysis supported by conceptual data systems. Quality and Quantity, 33(2), 135-156.
  56. Malherbe, L., Montalban, M., Bédu, N. & Granier, C. (2019). Cryptocurrencies and Blockchain: Opportunities and Limits of a New Monetary Regime. International Journal of Political Economy, 48(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911916.2019.1624320
  57. May, T.C. (1988). The crypto anarchist manifesto. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/crypto-anarchist-manifesto/
  58. Mayring, P. (2004). Qualitative content analysis. In: Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. A Companion to Qualitative Research (266-69). London: Sage.
  59. Miscione, G. & Kavanagh, D. (2015). Bitcoin and the Blockchain: A Coup D’État through Digital Heterotopia? Humanistic Management Network, Research Paper Series No. 23/15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2624922
  60. Nabben, K. (2021). Imagining Human-Machine Futures: Blockchain-based ‘Decentralized Autonomous Organizations’. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3953623
  61. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. https://nakamotoinstitute.org/library/bitcoin/
  62. Narayanan, A. (2013). What happened to the crypto dream? Part 1. IEEE Security & Privacy, 11(2), 75-76. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2013.45
  63. Parkin, J. (2019). The senatorial governance of Bitcoin: making (de)centralized money. Economy and Society, 48(3), 1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2019.1678262
  64. Poongodi, M., Nguyen, T. N., Hamdi, M., & Cengiz, K. (2021). Global cryptocurrency trend prediction using social media. Information Processing & Management, 58(6), 102708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102708
  65. Redshaw, T. (2017). Bitcoin beyond ambivalence: Popular rationalization and Feenberg’s technical politics. Thesis Eleven, 138(1), 46-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0725513616689390
  66. Robb, L. & Deane, F. (2021). Smart Cities as Panopticon: Highlighting Blockchain’s Potential for Smart Cities Through Competing Narratives. In: Wang, B.T. & Wang, C.M. (eds) Automating Cities. Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements (297-317). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8670-5_12
  67. Safitri, Y., Fathoni, A. & Haryono, A. T. (2018). Analysis the influence of risk management and investment on value added investors with online trading as intervening variable. (Study on Cryptocurrency Users of members the Bitcointalk forum). Journal of Management, 4(4). https://jurnal.unpand.ac.id/index.php/MS/article/view/1150
  68. Schilling, J. (2006). On the pragmatics of qualitative assessment: Designing the process for content analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.22.1.28
  69. Scott, B. (2017). Visions of a Techno-Leviathan: The Politics of the Bitcoin Blockchain. https://www.e-ir.info/2014/06/01/visions-of-a-techno-leviathan-the-politics-of-the-bitcoin-blockchain/
  70. Swartz, L. (2017). Blockchain dreams: Imagining techno-economic alternatives after Bitcoin. In: Castells, M. (Ed.). Another economy is possible: Culture and economy in a time of crisis (82-105). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  71. Swartz, L. (2018). What was Bitcoin, what will it be? The techno-economic imaginaries of a new money technology. Cultural Studies, 32(4), 623–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2017.1416420
  72. Vasek, M. & Moore, T. (2018). Analyzing the Bitcoin Ponzi scheme ecosystem. In International Conference on Financial Cryptography and Data Security (101-112). Berlin: Springer.
  73. Vilas, A. F., Redondo, R. P. D., Cancela, D. C. & Pazos, A. T. (2021). Interplay between Cryptocurrency Transactions and Online Financial Forums. Mathematics, 9(4), 1-22.
  74. Warren, C. & Laslett, B. (1977). Privacy and secrecy: A conceptual comparison. Journal of Social Issues, 33(3), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1977.tb01881.x
  75. Weber, B. (2016). Bitcoin and the legitimacy crisis of money. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(1), 17-41. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beu067