SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3

The Relationship Between Workforce Agility, Alienation, And Psychological Empowerment in The Digital Context

Dijital Bağlamda İşgücü Çevikliği, Yabancılaşma ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme İlişkisi

Serap Demirler0000-0002-6799-6469
Lale Oral Ataç(Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi)0000-0001-7261-7788
Pages
467–486
Publication Date
2026-07-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate a negative relationship between workforce agility and alienation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the impact of workforce agility on employee alienation in the banking sector, which is highly influenced by digital technologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It also explores whether psychological empowerment moderates this relationship.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate a negative relationship between workforce agility and alienation.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:işgücü çevikliği · çalışan çevikliği · yabancılaşma

Abstract

This study examines the impact of workforce agility on employee alienation in the banking sector, which is highly influenced by digital technologies. It also explores whether psychological empowerment moderates this relationship. The study surveys 317 bank employees in Turkey. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between workforce agility, alienation, and psychological empowerment. The results indicate a negative relationship between workforce agility and alienation. Furthermore, psychological empowerment is found to have a positive relationship with workforce agility and a negative relationship with alienation. Psychological empowerment did not show a significant moderating effect. However, the meaning dimension of psychological empowerment strengthened the relationship between agility and alienation. This study contributes to the literature by linking workforce agility to reduced alienation in the digitalized banking sector. It also highlights the importance of the meaning dimension of psychological empowerment in enhancing this relationship. The findings suggest that enhancing agility and meaning at work can reduce alienation and improve employee wellbeing.

Özet

Bu çalışma, dijital teknolojilerden büyük ölçüde etkilenen bankacılık sektöründe iş gücü çevikliğinin çalışanların yabancılaşması üzerindeki etkisini incelemektedir. Ayrıca, psikolojik güçlendirmenin bu ilişkiyi düzenleyici bir rol oynayıp oynamadığı araştırılmaktadır. Çalışma kapsamında Türkiye’de 317 banka çalışanına anket uygulanmıştır. İş gücü çevikliği, yabancılaşma ve psikolojik güçlendirme arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek için korelasyon ve regresyon analizleri yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar, iş gücü çevikliği ile yabancılaşma arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, psikolojik güçlendirmenin iş gücü çevikliği ile pozitif ve yabancılaşma ile negatif bir ilişkiye sahip olduğu bulunmuştur. Ancak, psikolojik güçlendirme anlamlı bir düzenleyici etki göstermemiştir. Bununla birlikte, psikolojik güçlendirmenin anlam boyutu, çeviklik ve yabancılaşma arasındaki ilişkiyi güçlendirmiştir. Bu çalışma, iş gücü çevikliğinin dijitalleşmenin yoğun olduğu bankacılık sektöründe yabancılaşmayı azaltabileceğini ortaya koyarak literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır. Ayrıca, psikolojik güçlendirmenin anlam boyutunun bu ilişkiyi güçlendirmedeki önemini vurgulamaktadır. Bulgular, iş yerinde çeviklik ve anlam duygusunu arttırmanın yabancılaşmayı azaltabileceğini ve çalışanların iyi oluşuna katkı sağlayacağını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirler, S., Ataç, L. O. (2026). The Relationship Between Workforce Agility, Alienation, And Psychological Empowerment in The Digital Context. Ege Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 3, 467–486. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.202600230

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Abdul-Gader, A. H. and Kozar, K. A. (1995). The Impact of Computer Alienation on Information Technology Investment Decisions: An Exploratory Cross-National Analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 535-559. https://doi.org/10.2307/249632
  2. Aggarwal, V. and Stanley, D. S. (2024). Relationship among e-hrm, workforce agility, technostress and work engagement: Techno hrm engagement model (them). Psychological Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-024-00811-4
  3. Alavi, S., Abd. Wahab, D., Muhamad, N. and Arbab Shirani, B. (2014). Organic structure and organisational learning as the main antecedents of workforce agility. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6273–6295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.919420
  4. Bayık, M.E. and Gürbüz, S. (2016). Ölçek Uyarlamada Metodoloji Sorunu: Yönetim ve Örgüt Alanında Uyarlanan Ölçekler Üzerinden Bir Araştırma. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 3(1), 1-20.
  5. Bharath, S., Nagesh, P. and Nanjundeswaraswamy, T.S. (2024). The Nexus amid Workforce Agility and Adaptive Performance: Mediating Role of Employee’s Loyalty among Information Technology Professionals. 2024 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), 1-4, doi: 10.1109/CONECCT62155.2024.10677295.
  6. Blauner, R. (1964). Alienation and Freedom: The Factory Worker and His Industry. University of Chicago Press.
  7. Braun, T.J., Hayes, B.C., DeMuth, R. L. F. and Taran, O.A. (2017). The Development, Validation, and Practical Application of an Employee Agility and Resilience Measure to Facilitate Organizational Change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10(4), 703–723. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2017.79
  8. Breu, K., Hemingway, C. J., Strathern, M. and Bridger, D. (2002). Workforce Agility: The New Employee Strategy for the Knowledge Economy. Journal of Information Technology, 17(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/02683960110132070
  9. De Clercq, D., Haq, I.U. and Azeem, M.U. (2018). Self-efficacy to spur job performance: Roles of job-related anxiety and perceived workplace incivility. Management Decision, 56(4), 891-907. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2017-0187
  10. Dean, D. G. (1961). Alienation: Its Meaning and Measurement. American Sociological Review, 26(5), 753. https://doi.org/10.2307/2090204
  11. Durkheim, E. (1976). Anomie and suicide. In L. A. Coser & B. Rosenberg (Ed.) Sociological theory (415-424). New York: MacMillan.
  12. Gloster, A.T., Meyer, A.H. and Lieb, R. (2017). Psychological flexibility as a malleable public health target: Evidence from a representative sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6, 166-171.
  13. Güğerçin, U. and Aksay, B. (2017). Dean‘in Yabancılaşma Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması: Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirlik Analizi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(1), 137-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.20173126266
  14. Gürbüz, S. and Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri- Felsefe, Yöntem, Analiz, Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2. Haga, T. (2022). Alienation in a digitalized world. AI & Society, 37, 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01381-z
  15. Hai, S., Long, T., Honora, A., Japutra, A., & Guo, T. (2025). The dark side of employee-generative AI collaboration in the workplace: An investigation on work alienation and employee expediency, International Journal of Information Management, 83, 102905, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2025.102905.
  16. Harvey, D. (2018). Universal alienation. Journal for Cultural Research, 22(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2018.1461350
  17. Hayes, A.F. (2018), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach (Methodology in the Social Sciences), The Guilford Press, Vol. 2.
  18. Hu, L. and Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  19. ILO (2022). The impact of Digitalization in the Finance Sector Technical Meeting on the Impact of Digitalization in the Finance Sector 1. Geneva, 24–28 January 2022.
  20. Kilic, E. and Kitapci, H. (2023). Cognitive job crafting: an intervening mechanism between intrinsic motivation and affective well-being. Management Research Review, 46(7), 1043-1058. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-08-2021-0605
  21. Kim, S. (2025). Impact of trust on workforce agility and logistics performance: Korean manufacturing industry. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2025.2455923
  22. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modelling. 3rd. Ed. Marcoulides, G.A. (1989). Measuring computer anxiety: The computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 49(3), 733–739. 10.1177/001316448904900328
  23. Marx, K. (2018). 1844 El Yazmalar. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  24. Muduli, A. and Pandya, G. (2018). Psychological Empowerment and Workforce Agility. Psychological Studies, 63(3), 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0456-8 Muduli, A. and Choudhury, A. (2024). Exploring the role of workforce agility on digital transformation: A systematic literatüre review. Benchmarking: An International Journal. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-02-2023-0108
  25. Nair, N. and Vohra, N. (2010). An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Management Decision, 48(4), 600–615. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741011041373
  26. Nart, S., Çelik, C. and Nart, S. (2020). Çalışma Ortamı Özelliklerinin İşe Yabancılaşmaya Etkileri: Bilgi Teknolojisi Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(2), 1687–1720. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i2.1462
  27. Olcay, Z.F. (2024). Psikolojik Güçlendirme ile Mutluluk Arasındaki İlişki: İş Güvenliği Uzmanları ve Teknikerleri Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Osmaniye Korkut Ata Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(4), 1470-1486. https://doi.org/10.47495/okufbed.1399116
  28. Quinones, C. (2016). The “always on” workplace: risks, opportunities and how to make it work. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295010320
  29. Rasheed, M. I. and Pitafi, A. H. (2024). Task structure and knowledge transfer: leveraging employee agility performance in an ESM environment. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2383260
  30. Rawashdeh, L. and Tibor, D. (2020). Innovation And The Role Of Employee Agility - A Case Study In Jordanian Banks. 58th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development – Budapest, 04-05 September, 2020.
  31. Rietze, S., & Zacher, H. (2022). Relationships between Agile Work Practices and Occupational Well-Being: The Role of Job Demands and Resources. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(3), 1258. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031258
  32. Sackey, B.B., Yang, J., Quansah, P.E., Ekumah, C.A., Arboh, F. and Boadu, B. (2025), "Internal marketing orientation and employee innovative behaviour: the mediating role of workforce agility and moderating role of psychological empowerment", Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 674-693. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHTI-01-2024-0063.
  33. Seeman, M. (1959). On The Meaning of Alienation. American Sociological Rewiev, 24(6), 783–791.
  34. Sharma, K., Nigam, N., Jha, J. K. and Xu, X. (2024). Role of Readiness to Change in the Relationship Between Workforce Agility and Digital Transformation: A Two-Timeframe Study. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 32(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4018/JGIM.345241
  35. Sherehiy, B. (2008). Relationship between agility strategy, work organization and workforce agility, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Louisville, Louisville.
  36. Sherehiy, B. and Karwowski, W. (2014). The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 44(3), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2014.01.002
  37. Sopra Siteria (2023). Digital Banking Experience Report 2023- The AI Enabled Banking Era. https://www.soprasteria.com/industries/financial-services/digital-banking-experience-report-2023
  38. Spreitzer, G.M. (1995). Psychological Empowerment in the Workplace: Dimensions, Measurement, and Validation. The Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442–1465.
  39. Sürgevil, O., Tolay, E. and Topoyan, M. (2013). Yapısal Güçlendirme Ve Psikolojik Güçlendirme Ölçeklerinin Geçerlilik Ve Güvenilirlik Analizleri. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, 8(31), 0-5391. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.47361
  40. Tabachnick, B. and Fidell, L. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  41. Toritseju, G.G., Dadzie, B. C. and Miebi, E. (2022). Workforce Agility and The Performance of The Banking Sector in Nigeria. BW Academic Journal, Retrieved from https://bwjournal.org/index.php/bsjournal/article/view/5
  42. Uçar, Z. (2018). Algılanan Özerklik ve Etki İle Psikolojik Sahiplenme Arasındaki İlişkide Kontrol Algısının Aracılık Etkisi: Banka Çalışanları Üzerinde Bir Araştırma. Ege Akademik Bakış, 18(1), 1-14.
  43. Vinokurov, L.V. and Kozhina, A.A. (2020). The Contribution of Individual Psychological Features to the Determination of the Phenomenon of Work Alienation. Behavioral Sciences, 10(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10010034
  44. Xia, B., Wang, X., Li, Q., He, Y., & Wang, W. (2022). How workplace incivility leads to work alienation: A moderated mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology. 13. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.921161.
  45. Yaping, G., Siu-Yin, C., Mo, W. and Jia-Chi, H. (2012). Unfolding the Proactive Process for Creativity: Integration of the Employee Proactivity, Information Exchange, and Psychological Safety Perspectives. Journal of Management, 38(5), 1611 – 1633.