Journals / Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Physical Activity Level of Middle School Students With Pedometer

Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeylerinin Pedometre İle Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2020-04-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These data indicate that students involved in accumulated a greater number of steps on Physical education class.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to evaluate 7th grade students’ physical activity level by using a pedometer.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 72 teenagers who voluntarily provided data which were collected three different times a) in a week long b) just for the weekend c) the day that student’ attend physical education class for a week recording period.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These data indicate that students involved in accumulated a greater number of steps on Physical education class.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Fiziksel aktivite · Beden Eğitimi ve Spor dersi · Pedometre

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate 7th grade students’ physical activity level by using a pedometer. Data were collected from 72 teenagers who voluntarily provided data which were collected three different times a) in a week long b) just for the weekend c) the day that student’ attend physical education class for a week recording period. The participants’ demographic profiles were as follows: 7th grade students (35 boys’ M age 12.48 years; BMI=19.38 kg/m2; 37 girls’ M age 12.59 years; BMI=21.15 kg/m2) from a middle school located in Ankara. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA were used to examine differences in total steps/day between sex and activity groups which were a week long, a weekend and physical education week day. The total sample took 8339 steps/day, boys 9154 steps/day, versus girls 8735 steps/day. Steps computed for week days, weekends and physical education class day there were a significant difference between steps/day F (1-71) = 8.868 p<0.05] and gender [F (1-71) = 26.252 p<0.05] week days, weekends and PE class day across day either group while no differences interaction effects [F (1-71) = 17004 p<0.05]. These data indicate that students involved in accumulated a greater number of steps on Physical education class.

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, 7.sınıf öğrencilerinin fiziksel aktivite düzeylerini pedometre kullanarak değerlendirmektir. Araştırmaya, Ankara ili Çankaya ilçesinde bulunan bir devlet ortaokulundan 72 gönüllü -35 erkek, 37 kız- 7.sınıf öğrencisi katıldı. Erkek öğrencilerin yaş ortalaması 12.48, vücut kütle indeksi (VKİ) 19.38 kg/m2 iken kız öğrencilerin yaş ortalaması 12.59, VKİ ise 21.15 kg/m2’dir. Çalışma öncesi, öğrencilere pedometre kullanımı ve uygulama sürecinde ne yapacakları anlatıldı. Öğrenciler, her sabah pedometreyi sıfırladı. Gece yatana kadar geçen sürede attıkları adım sayılarını, bir hafta boyunca onlara verilen günlük adım sayı tablosuna kaydederek tabloyu beden eğitimi öğretmenlerine teslim ettiler. Bir hafta boyunca –hafta içi, hafta sonu ve beden eğitimi dersinin olduğu gün- öğrencilerin attıkları adım sayılarının ortalamaları arasındaki toplam adım/gün farklarını incelemek için tekrarlanan ölçümlerde tek yönlü varyans analizi ve bağımsız gruplarda t testi kullanılarak veri analizi yapıldı. Yapılan analizler sonucunda 7.sınıf öğrencilerinin hafta içi günde ortalama 8339 adım/gün adım attıkları tespit edildi. Haftanın diğer günleri ile beden eğitimi ve spor dersinin olduğu güne [F(1-71)= 8.868 p<0.05] ve cinsiyete [F(1-71)= 26.252 p<0.05] göre anlamlı farklılıklar bulundu. Bu sonuca göre ortaokul öğrencilerinin hafta içi ve hafta sonuna göre beden eğitimi ve spor dersinin olduğu gün daha fazla adım atıkları söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BULCA, Y., BİLGİN, E., DEMİRHAN, G. (2020). Evaluation of Physical Activity Level of Middle School Students With Pedometer. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/147600

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Açıkgöz KÜ. (1992). İşbirlikli, Öğrenme, Kuram, Araştırma, Uygulama. Malatya: Uğurel Matbaası
  2. Aibar A, Bois JE, Casterad JZ, Generelo E, Paillard T, Fairclough S (2014). Weekday and weekend physical activity patterns of French and Spanish adolescents. European Journal of Sport Science. 14(5): 500-509
  3. Beets MW, Bornstein D, Beighle A, Cardinal BJ., Morgan CF (2010). Pedometer measured physical activity patterns of youth: a 13-country review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 38(2): 208-216
  4. Beighle, A, Pangrazi, RP, & Vincent, SD. (2001). Pedometers, physical activity, and accountability. Journal of Physical Education Recreation & Dance, 72(9), 16–36
  5. Brusseau, TA, Kulinna, PH. (2015). An examination of four traditional school physical activity models on children's step counts and MVPA. Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 86(1), 88-93
  6. Büyüköztürk, Ş, Çakmak, EK, Akgün ÖE, Karadeniz Ş, Demirel, F, (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri Ankara. Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık
  7. Cavill N, Biddle, S, Sallis, JF (2001). Health enhancing physical activity for young people: statement of the United Kingdom expert consensus conference. Pediatric exercise science, 13(1), 12-25
  8. Duncan JS, Schofield G, Duncan EK (2006). Step count recommendations for children based on body fat. Preventive Medicine. 44(1): 42-44
  9. Freedson PS, Miller K (2000). Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 21–29
  10. Gauthier AP, Laurence M, Thirkill, L,Dorman SC (2012). Examining school‐based pedometer step counts among children in grades 3 to 6 using different timetables. Journal of School Health, 82(7), 311-317
  11. Kesaniemi, Y, Danforth, E, Jensen M. Kopelman, P, Lefebvre P, Reeder, B (2001). Dose-response issues concerning physical activity and health: an evidence-based symposium. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33, 351-358
  12. Lindberg, R. (2000). Active living: on the road with the 10,000 steps program. Journal of the American Dietetic Association,100, 878–879
  13. Malina, RM (2001). Physical activity and fitness: pathways from childhood to adulthood. American Journal of Human Biology, 13(2), 162-172
  14. McKenzie, TL, JF. Sallis, Prochaska, TL. Conway, SJ. Marshall, Rosengard P (2004). Evaluation of a two-year middle-school physical education intervention: M-span. Med. Sci. Sports Exercise., Vol. 36, No. 8, pp. 1382–1388
  15. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı (20