Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3

Do architects' and users' reality coincide? A post occupancy evaluation in a university lecture hall

Pages
119–133
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This paper argues that in viewing educational spaces from another perspective, and in particular shared social-academic spaces, POE can be a valuable instrument of reflection.This case provides new insights into the university's educational building design considerations and into engaging users, designers, university coordinators and researchers in a variety of issues of POE to provide a more holistic understanding.The purpose of this study is to find out whether spatial characteristics and overall aesthetic affects students'/occupants' work performance and satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Post Occupancy Evaluation provides a good opportunity to make the built environment much more sustainable by correlating building performance to the occupant's needs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper argues that in viewing educational spaces from another perspective, and in particular shared social-academic spaces, POE can be a valuable instrument of reflection.This case provides new insights into the university's educational building design considerations and into engaging users, designers, university coordinators and researchers in a variety of issues of POE to provide a more holistic understanding.The purpose of this study is to find out whether spatial characteristics and overall aesthetic affects students'/occupants' work performance and satisfaction.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this way, a detailed study of the Lecture Hall could contribute to setting the basis for future possible constructions of educational buildings.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Post Occupancy Evaluation provides a good opportunity to make the built environment much more sustainable by correlating building performance to the occupant's needs. The need for socialisation for youth on a university campus is particularly important. This paper argues that in viewing educational spaces from another perspective, and in particular shared social-academic spaces, POE can be a valuable instrument of reflection.This case provides new insights into the university's educational building design considerations and into engaging users, designers, university coordinators and researchers in a variety of issues of POE to provide a more holistic understanding.The purpose of this study is to find out whether spatial characteristics and overall aesthetic affects students'/occupants' work performance and satisfaction. It aims to identify the environmental quality design criteria and whether criteria such as building layout, thermal, lighting and sound comfort, and maintenance are among the designer's expectations. User's ideas were elicited and from them suggestions for space enhancement were taken in consideration. The study also aims to find out how the building affected the students and their behaviours with its construction in the Istanbul Technical University campus, and on the other side, how satisfied students are with this new building. A multi-way analysis based on questionnaires, interviews, observations, photographs and behavioural maps is used to achieve the set goals. In this way, a detailed study of the Lecture Hall could contribute to setting the basis for future possible constructions of educational buildings.

🔖

Cite This Article

MANAHASA, O., ÖZSOY, A. (2016). Do architects' and users' reality coincide? A post occupancy evaluation in a university lecture hall. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 3, 119–133. https://ajindex.com/articles/147221

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Bound, M. and Flemmer, C. (2015). New Zealand Built Environment Research Symposium Occupants' Perspectives Of A Five Green Star Certified School Building. Retrieved from: http://construction.massey.ac.nz/NZBERS-2014_proc_fp_Bound-M.pdf (Accessed: 16 May 2016).
  2. Binat, B. and Şık, N. (2014). Vitra Çağdaş Mimarlık Dizisi 3: Eğitim Yapıları. Istanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık. CABE (2005) Design with distinction: The value of good building design in higher education. Retrieved from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives. gov.uk/20110118095356/ http://www. cabe.org.uk/files/design-with-distinction.pdf (Accessed: 9 November 2015). Cengizkan. N. M., (2014). National Architecture Exhibition and Awards, XIV./ 2014.
  3. Buildings, Projects, Ideas. Ankara: The Chamber of Architects of Turkey Publications. Chikezie, E., Clinton, A., and Wellington, T. (2013). An exploratory literature review of post. International Conference on Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE'2013) Nov. 27-28, (pp. 170-173). Johannesburg (South Africa). Cooper, I. (2001), Post-Occupancy Evaluation - where are you? Building Research and Information, vol. 29, no: 2, pp.158-163.
  4. Cubukcu, E. and Isitan, Z. N. (2011) 'Does student behavior differ in relation to perception / evaluation of campus environments? A post-occupancy research in two university campuses', Gazi University Journal of Science, vol.24 no: 3, pp. 547-558.
  5. Dursun, P., Ozsoy, A., (2008), How can architects learn from their own experience? ITU AZ vol. 5 no: 2, pp. 82- 95. Erkol, I. (2015), 'Mimarinin "Sessiz" Hali: İTÜ Merkezi Derslik Binası', (Silent State of Architecture), Mimarlık Dergisi, Retrieved from http://www. mimarlikdergisi.com/index.cfm?sayfa=mimarlik&DergiSayi=398&RecID=3705 (Accessed: 10 April 2016).
  6. Günay, A. and Günay, D. (2011), Quantitative developments in Turkish higher education since 1933. Journal of Higher Education and Science, pp. 1-22.
  7. Khalil, N., Husin, H. N., Wahab, L. A., Kamal, K. S., and Mahat, N. (2011), Performance evaluation of indoor environment towards sustainability for higher educational buildings. US-China Education Review, Vol.A no:2, pp.188-195, Retrieved from: http:// files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED524814.pdf (Accessed: 13 April 2013).
  8. Meir, I.A., Garb, Y., Jiao, D. and Cicelsky, A. (2009), 'Post-occupancy evaluation: An inevitable step toward sustainability', Earthscan, vol.3, pp. 189-220.
  9. Lackney, J.A., (2001), The State of Post-Occupancy Evaluation in the Practice of Educational Design, Retrieved fr