Journals / Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3

Statistical Analysis for Various Parameters of an International Functional Training Competition in Turkey

Türkiye’de Düzenlenen Fonksiyonel Antrenman Yarışmasının Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi

Muhammed Hüseyin Ocak(İSTANBUL ESENYURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4334-1334
Kaan Kaya(İSTANBUL ESENYURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0892-645X
Onur Viga(İSTANBUL ESENYURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1676-7850
Pages
1–22
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The findings of this research can provide enlightening information about the parameters that should be taken into account by the organizers of Crossfit competitions during the preparation phase of the competition content and the athletes during the preparation phase for these competitions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The number of Crossfit competitions held is increasing day by day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the study, a questionnaire containing this information was applied to the competitors (n = 184; 133 men, 51 women) and the data obtained were statistically compared with the scores at the end of the competition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The findings of this research can provide enlightening information about the parameters that should be taken into account by the organizers of Crossfit competitions during the preparation phase of the competition content and the athletes during the preparation phase for these competitions.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Crossfit · fonksiyonel antrenman · yarışma

Abstract

Purpose: The number of Crossfit competitions held is increasing day by day. The factors affecting the results in these competitions have become an important research topic. This study aimed to analyze whether the results of an international Crossfit competition held in Turkey differ according to the age, height, bodyweight, training time, number of daily steps, and athlete history parameters of the competitors. Method: The competition consisted of six stages and includes eight categories created according to the level of the athletes. For the study, a questionnaire containing this information was applied to the competitors (n = 184; 133 men, 51 women) and the data obtained were statistically compared with the scores at the end of the competition. Results: The findings of this study showed that age, height, body weight, exercise duration, and athlete history parameters affected the results of the functional training competition. In particular, it was observed that the height factor significantly affected the results of the competition, and the tall athletes scored better in most categories (p < 0.05). In addition, it was observed that age and body weight parameters created significant differences in some categories and some stages. It has been determined that the competitors with more than 10,000 daily steps were more unsuccessful in the total ranking. The daily exercise time of the athletes who were successful in the competition was 75-90 minutes. It has been noted that they did Crossfit training 5 days a week and that all finalist athletes were also interested in sports branches other than Crossfit. Conclusion: The findings of this research can provide enlightening information about the parameters that should be taken into account by the organizers of Crossfit competitions during the preparation phase of the competition content and the athletes during the preparation phase for these competitions.

Özet

Amaç: Düzenlenen Crossfit yarışmalarının sayısı gün geçtikçe artmaktadır. Bu yarışmalarda sonuçları etkileyen faktörler önemli bir araştırma konusu haline gelmiştir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de düzenlenen bir uluslararası Crossfit yarışmasının sonuçlarının, yarışmacıların yaş, boy uzunluğu, vücut ağırlığı, antrenman süresi, günlük adım sayısı ve sporcu geçmişi parametrelerine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğinin analiz edilmesidir. Yöntem: Yarışmalar 6 farklı etaptan oluşmakta ve sporcuların seviyelerine göre oluşturulmuş 8 farklı kategori içermektedir. Çalışma için yarışmacılara (n = 184; 133 erkek, 51 kadın) bu bilgileri içeren anket uygulanmış ve elde edilen veriler yarışma sonucundaki puanlarla istatistiksel olarak karşılaştırılmıştır. Bulgular: Bu araştırmanın bulguları, incelenen fonksiyonel antrenman yarışmasında yaş, boy uzunluğu, vücut ağırlığı, egzersiz süresi ve sporcu geçmişi parametrelerinin yarışma sonucunu etkilediğini göstermiştir. Özellikle boy uzunluğu faktörünün yarışma sonucunu önemli ölçüde etkilediği ve çoğu kategoride boyu uzun olan sporcuların daha iyi puan aldıkları gözlenmiştir (p < 0,05). Ayrıca yaş ve vücut ağırlığı parametrelerinin de bazı kategorilerde ve bazı etaplarda anlamlı farklılıklar oluşturduğu görülmüştür. Günlük adım sayısı 10.000’den fazla olan yarışmacıların total sıralamada daha başarısız oldukları tespit edilmiştir. Yarışmada başarılı olan sporcuların günlük egzersiz süresinin 75-90 dk. arasında olduğu, haftada 5 gün Crossfit antrenmanı yaptıkları ve tüm finalist sporcuların Crossfit dışında başka spor dallarıyla da ilgilendikleri kaydedilmiştir. Sonuç: Bu araştırmadan elde edilen bulgular, incelenen tüm parametrelerin yarışma sonucunda farklar oluşturduğunu göstermiştir. Bu çalışmanın bulguları, gelecekte düzenlenecek olan fonksiyonel antrenman ve Crossfit yarışmalarının içeriğinde yer alacak egzersizlerin bir gruba ekstra avantajlar sağlamayacak şekilde, dengeli düzenlenmesi için bir rehber oluşturabilir. Ayrıca, bu tür yarışmalara katılacak olan sporcuların yarışma içerisindeki hareketlerin hangi faktörlerden daha fazla etkilendiğini belirleyerek bu egzersizlere yönelik ekstra çalışmalar yapmaları faydalı olabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ocak, M. H., Subak, G. E., Papur, E., Kaya, K., Viga, O. (2022). Statistical Analysis for Various Parameters of an International Functional Training Competition in Turkey. Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 3, 1–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/1471927

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (33)

  1. Aslan, C. S., & Dalkıran, O. (2014). Boy uzunluğunun motorik özelliklere etkisinin incelenmesi. Spor Hekimliği Dergisi, 49(4), 147-153.
  2. Baker, J. S., Brock, S., Dalleck, L. C., Goulet, E. D. B., Gotshall, R. W., Hutchison, A., Knight-Maloney, M., Kravitz, L., Laskin, J. J., Lim, Y. A., Lowery, L. M., Marks, D. W., Mermier, C., Robergs, R. A., Vella, C. A., Wagner, D. R., Wyatt, F. B., Drake, N. B., Smeed, J., Carper, M. J., Derek, A., & Crawford. (2017). Effects of Short-Term CrossFit Training: A Magnitude-Based Approach. (Ed.),^(Eds.).
  3. Balyi, I., Way, R., & Higgs, C. (2013). Long-term athlete development. Human Kinetics.
  4. Barfield, J. P., & Anderson, A. (2014). Effect of CrossFit™ on Health-related Physical Fitness: A Pilot Study. Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.0033.2014
  5. Başar, M. A., Bulgan, Ç., Odabaşı, S., & Aktüre, K. G. (2020). CrossFit Antrenman Yöntemine Bütünsel Yaklaşım. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Sports Sciences, 12(3).
  6. Bellar, D., Hatchett, A., Judge, L. W., Breaux, M. E., & Marcus, L. (2015). The relationship of aerobic capacity, anaerobic peak power and experience to performance in CrossFit exercise. Biology of sport, 32(4), 315-320. https://doi.org/10.5604/20831862.1174771
  7. Bergeron, M. F., Nindl, B. C., Deuster, P. A., Baumgartner, N., Kane, S. F., Kraemer, W. J., Sexauer, L. R., Thompson, W. R., & O'Connor, F. G. (2011). Consortium for Health and Military Performance and American College of Sports Medicine consensus paper on extreme conditioning programs in military personnel. Curr Sports Med Rep, 10(6), 383-389. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0b013e318237bf8a
  8. Butcher, S. J., Neyedly, T. J., Horvey, K. J., & Benko, C. R. (2015). Do physiological measures predict selected CrossFit(®) benchmark performance? Open Access J Sports Med, 6, 241-247. https://doi.org/10.2147/oajsm.S88265
  9. Carreker, J. D., & Grosicki, G. J. (2020). Physiological Predictors of Performance on the CrossFit "Murph" Challenge. Sports (Basel), 8(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/sports8070092
  10. Dexheimer, J. D., Schroeder, E. T., Sawyer, B. J., Pettitt, R. W., Aguinaldo, A. L., & Torrence, W. A. (2019). Physiological Performance Measures as Indicators of CrossFit(®) Performance. Sports (Basel), 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7040093
  11. Dominski, F. H., Serafim, T. T., Siqueira, T. C., & Andrade, A. (2021). Psychological variables of CrossFit participants: a systematic review. Sport Sciences for Health, 17(1), 21-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-020-00685-9
  12. Erman, A., Tatar, O., Yıldız, F., & Hindistan, İ. (1996). 7-13 yaş grubu tenisçilerin antropometrik profillerinin incelenmesi. HÜ 4. Spor Bilimleri Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitapçığı.
  13. Escobar, K. A., Morales, J., & VanDusseldorp, T. A. (2017). Metabolic profile of a crossfit training bout [Anaerobic exercise; High-Intensity; Lactate; Metabolism]. 2017, 12(4), 8. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2017.124.11
  14. Fisker, F. Y., Kildegaard, S., Thygesen, M., Grosen, K., & Pfeiffer-Jensen, M. (2017). Acute tendon changes in intense CrossFit workout: an observational cohort study. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 27(11), 1258-1262. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12781
  15. Glassman, G. (2002). What is the fitness and who is fit?. https://journal.crossfit.com/article/what-is-fitness
  16. Kliszczewicz, B., Snarr, R. L., & Esco, M. R. (2014). Metabolic and Cardiovascular Response to the CrossFit Workout ‘Cindy’. Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v2i2.38
  17. Larsen, R. T., Hessner, A. L., Ishøi, L., Langberg, H., & Christensen, J. (2020). Injuries in Novice Participants during an Eight-Week Start up CrossFit Program-A Prospective Cohort Study. Sports (Basel), 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/sports8020021
  18. Lichtenstein, M. B., & Jensen, T. T. (2016). Exercise addiction in CrossFit: Prevalence and psychometric properties of the Exercise Addiction Inventory. Addict Behav Rep, 3, 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abrep.2016.02.002
  19. Mangine, G. T., Stratton, M. T., Almeda, C. G., Roberts, M. D., Esmat, T. A., VanDusseldorp, T. A., & Feito, Y. (2020). Physiological differences between advanced CrossFit athletes, recreational CrossFit participants, and physically-active adults. PLOS ONE, 15(4), e0223548. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223548
  20. Martínez-Gómez, R., Valenzuela, P. L., Alejo, L. B., Gil-Cabrera, J., Montalvo-Pérez, A., Talavera, E., Lucia, A., Moral-González, S., & Barranco-Gil, D. (2020). Physiological Predictors of Competition Performance in CrossFit Athletes. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103699
  21. Maté-Muñoz, J. L., Lougedo, J. H., Barba, M., Cañuelo-Márquez, A. M., Guodemar-Pérez, J., García-Fernández, P., Lozano-Estevan, M. D. C., Alonso-Melero, R., Sánchez-Calabuig, M. A., Ruíz-López, M., de Jesús, F., & Garnacho-Castaño, M. V. (2018). Cardiometabolic and Muscular Fatigue Responses to Different CrossFit® Workouts. J Sports Sci Med, 17(4), 668-679.
  22. Meyer, M., Sundaram, S., & Schafhalter-Zoppoth, I. (2021). Exertional and CrossFit-Induced Rhabdomyolysis. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 31(5). https://journals.lww.com/cjsportsmed/Fulltext/2021/09000/Exertional_and_CrossFit_Induced_Rhabdomyolysis.24.aspx
  23. Moran, S., Booker, H., Staines, J., & Williams, S. (2017). Rates and risk factors of injury in CrossFitTM: a prospective cohort study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 57(9), 1147-1153. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0022-4707.16.06827-4
  24. Mullins, N. (2015). CrossFit: remember what you have learned; apply what you know [Article]. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 18, 32+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A438289987/AONE?u=anon~62d3233a&sid=googleScholar&xid=4de738a1
  25. Poderoso, R., Cirilo-Sousa, M., Júnior, A., Novaes, J., Vianna, J., Dias, M., Leitão, L., Reis, V., Neto, N., & Vilaça-Alves, J. (2019). Gender Differences in Chronic Hormonal and Immunological Responses to CrossFit(®). Int J Environ Res Public Health, 16(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142577
  26. Poston, W. S. C., Haddock, C. K., Heinrich, K. M., Jahnke, S. A., Jitnarin, N., & Batchelor, D. B. (2016). Is High-Intensity Functional Training (HIFT)/CrossFit Safe for Military Fitness Training? Military medicine, 181(7), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00273
  27. Sprey, J. W., Ferreira, T., de Lima, M. V., Duarte, A., Jr., Jorge, P. B., & Santili, C. (2016). An Epidemiological Profile of CrossFit Athletes in Brazil. Orthop J Sports Med, 4(8), 2325967116663706. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967116663706
  28. Stracciolini, A., Quinn, B., Zwicker, R. L., Howell, D. R., & Sugimoto, D. (2020). Part I: Crossfit-Related Injury Characteristics Presenting to Sports Medicine Clinic. Clin J Sport Med, 30(2), 102-107. https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0000000000000805
  29. Weisenthal, B. M., Beck, C. A., Maloney, M. D., DeHaven, K. E., & Giordano, B. D. (2014). Injury Rate and Patterns Among CrossFit Athletes. Orthop J Sports Med, 2(4), 2325967114531177. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967114531177
  30. Weyand, P. G., & Davis, J. A. (2005). Running performance has a structural basis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208(14), 2625-2631. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01609
  31. Weyand, P. G., Sternlight, D. B., Bellizzi, M. J., & Wright, S. (2000). Faster top running speeds are achieved with greater ground forces not more rapid leg movements. J Appl Physiol (1985), 89(5), 1991-1999. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.2000.89.5.1991
  32. Wright, S., & Weyand, P. G. (2001). The application of ground force explains the energetic cost of running backward and forward. Journal of Experimental Biology, 204(10), 1805-1815. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.204.10.1805
  33. Yüksel, O., Gündüz, B., & Kayhan, M. (2019). Effect of Crossfit Training on Jump and Strength. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 7(1), 121-124.