SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences / 2020 / Sayı: 59

Redefining Security in the Middle East: Representation of Security as an Emancipatory Discourse in the Capernaum Film

Orta Doğu’da Güvenliği Yeniden Tanımlanmak: Kefernahum Filminde Özgürleştirici Bir Söylem Olarak Güvenliğin Temsili

Mehmet Işık(Mardin Artuklu University)0000-0002-1682-2610
Emrah Özdemir(CANKIRI KARATEKIN UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8125-6486
Pages
193–217
Publication Date
2021-01-18
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the film cannot address the causes, historical and social origins of these problems adequately, so, this might cause disconnections in the imagination of the audience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Middle East is considered as a marginalized geography and difficult to understand for Western countries due to an orientalist and postcolonial perspective.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Capernaum is a significant and effective example in terms of reflecting different living conditions and security perceptions in the Lebanon.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the film cannot address the causes, historical and social origins of these problems adequately, so, this might cause disconnections in the imagination of the audience.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Sinema · Lübnan · postolonyalizm

Abstract

The Middle East is considered as a marginalized geography and difficult to understand for Western countries due to an orientalist and postcolonial perspective. Today, Lebanon, which offers an important opportunity to understand the Middle East from the political, economic, sociological and security perspectives, is a country facing various problems such as poverty, economic and political instability, ethnic and sectarian conflicts, uncontrolled migration movements and gender inequalities. Capernaum is a significant and effective example in terms of reflecting different living conditions and security perceptions in the Lebanon. In this study, how the security is defined through the eyes of the people from the Lebanon and how the perception of threats is shaped by the security issues of Lebanon are examined through the compelling Capernaum (2018) film of Lebanese female director and screenwriter Nadine Labaki. In this respect, the qualitative thematic content analysis of the film is carried out and it is revealed how the economic, social and religious problems of the Lebanese individuals evaluated in the context of human security are reflected in the film. As a result of the analysis, Capernaum is an exemplary film in terms of addressing the security concerns of Lebanon with a human security and gender perspectives. However, the film cannot address the causes, historical and social origins of these problems adequately, so, this might cause disconnections in the imagination of the audience.

Özet

Ötekileştirilmiş bir coğrafya olarak kabul edilen Orta Doğu’nun, Batı ülkeleri için oryantalist ve postkolonyal bir bakış açısıyla anlaşılması zordur. Bugün Orta Doğu’yu siyasi, ekonomik, sosyolojik ve güvenlik açılarından anlamak için önemli bir fırsat sunan Lübnan, yoksulluk, ekonomik ve politik istikrarsızlık etnik ve mezhep çatışmaları, kontrolsüz göç hareketleri ve cinsiyet eşitsizlikleri gibi çeşitli sorunlarla karşı karşıyadır. Kefernahum (2018), Lübnan’daki farklı yaşam koşullarını ve güvenlik algılarını yansıtmak açısından önemli ve etkili bir örnektir. Bu çalışmada, güvenliğin Lübnan halkının gözüyle nasıl tanımlandığı ve onların tehdit algılarının Lübnan’ın güvenlik meseleleri tarafından nasıl şekillendirildiği Lübnanlı kadın yönetmen ve senarist Nadine Labaki’nin ilgi uyandıran filmi Kefernahum (2018) üzerinden incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda, filmin tematik içerik analizi yapılmakta ve Lübnanlı bireylerin ekonomik, sosyal ve dini sorunlarının filme nasıl yansıdığı insan güvenliği bağlamında ele alınmaktadır. Analiz sonucunda Kefernahum’un Lübnan’ın güvenlik endişelerini insani güvenlik ve toplumsal cinsiyet perspektifleriyle ele alma konusunda örnek bir film olduğu değerlendirilmektedir. Ancak, filmin bu endişelerin nedenlerini, tarihsel ve sosyal kökenlerini yeterince ele alamaması seyircinin tahayyülünde kopukluklara neden olabilir..

🔖

Cite This Article

Işık, M., Özdemir, E. (2021). Redefining Security in the Middle East: Representation of Security as an Emancipatory Discourse in the Capernaum Film. Connectist: Istanbul University Journal of Communication Sciences, Sayı: 59, 193–217. https://doi.org/10.26650/CONNECTIST2020-0032

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Aridi, S. (2018, 11 April). Capernaum is not just a film, but a rallying cry. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/12/14/movies/Capernaum-nadine-labaki.html
  2. Aristoteles (2017). Poetika Şiir Sanatı Üzerine (F. Akderin, Trans.). İstanbul, Turkey: Say Yayınları.
  3. Armes, R. (2015). New Voices in Arab Cinema. Bloomington, USA: Indiana University Press.
  4. Badran, T. (2009). Lebanon’s militia wars. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Lebanon: Liberation, Conflict, and Crisis, (pp. 35-62). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  5. Bağır, M. (2018). Aristoteles’in mimesis ve katharsis kavramları üzerinden bir film incelemesi: Dogville. Ege Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Medya ve İletişim Araştırmaları Hakemli E-Dergisi, 2, 36-55.
  6. Barkawi, T., & Laffey, M. (2006). The postcolonial moment in security studies. Review of International Studies, 32, 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210506007054
  7. Barrington, L. (2019, 8 March). Hezbollah calls on supporters to donate as sanctions pressure bites. Reuters. Retrieved from https://reut.rs/2EX7AqS
  8. Bilgin, P. (2005). Regional Security in the Middle East. New York, USA: Routledge.
  9. Bilo C., & Machado, A. C. (2018). Children’s Right to Social Protection in the Middle East and North Africa Region—an Analysis of Legal Frameworks from a Child Rights Perspective. New York, USA: UNICEF & IPCIG.
  10. Bowering, G., Crone, P., Kadi, W., Stewart D.J., & Zaman, M.Q. (2012). The Princeton Encyclopedia of Islamic Political Thought. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.
  11. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  12. Çalık, M., & Sözbilir, M. (2014). İçerik analizinin parametreleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(174), 33-38.
  13. Çalık, M., Ünal, S., Coştu, B., & Karataş, Ö. F. (2008). Trends in Turkish science education. Essays in Education, Special Edition, 23-45.
  14. Cleveland, W. L., & Burton, M. (2004). A History of the Modern Middle East. Oxford, UK: Westview Press.
  15. Davison, R. H. (1960). Where is the Middle East? Foreign Affairs, 38(4), 665-675.
  16. Dursun, Ç. (2001). TV Haberlerinde İdeoloji. Ankara, Turkey: İmge Kitabevi.
  17. Erdem, G. (2018). Lübnan’da Şii siyasi hareketin evrimi: Emel’den Hizbullah’a. The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 49, 21-55. https://doi.org/10.1501/Intrel_0000000316
  18. Faour, M. A. (2007). Religion, demography and politics in Lebanon. Middle Eastern Studies, 43(6), 909-921. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00263200701568279
  19. Farha, M. (2009). Demographic dilemmas. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Lebanon: Liberation, Conflict, and Crisis, (pp. 83-98). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  20. Fernández, M. C. R. (2014). Under the skin they live in: Gendered conflicts in contemporary European films. In J. F. Fernández & A. M. Álvarez (Eds.), A Rich Field Full of Pleasant Surprises: Essays on Contemporary Literature in Honour of Professor Socorro Suárez Lafuente (pp. 64-80). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  21. Graham, D. T., & Poku, N. K. (2000). Migration, Globalization and Human Security. London, UK: Routledge.
  22. Haddad, S. (2009). Lebanon: From Consociationalism to Conciliation. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 15(3-4), 398-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/13537110903346684
  23. Hall, S. (1982). The rediscovery of “ideology”: Return of the repressed in media studies. In T. Gurevitch, M. Bennet, J. Currna, & J. Woollacott (Eds.), Culture, Society and the Media (pp. 56-90). London, UK: Methuen.
  24. Hansen, L. M. (2014). Cautious optimism: The Helsinki Process as a model for negotiations in the Middle East. In C. Kane and E. Murauskaite (Eds.), Regional Security Dialogue in the Middle East (pp. 19-37). New York, USA: Routledge.
  25. Harris, W. (2009). Reflections on Lebanon. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Lebanon: Liberation, Conflict, and Crisis, (pp. 9-23). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  26. Haytayan, L. (2006). “Beirut.” In M. Dumper, & B. E. Stanley (Eds.), Cities of the Middle East and North Africa: A Historical Encyclopedia, (pp. 82-88). California, USA: ABC Clio.
  27. Hermez, S. (2017). War is Coming: Between Past and Future Violence in Lebanon. Philadelphia, USA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  28. Hill, J. N. C., & Cavatorta, F. (2019). Dimensions of security. Middle Eastern Studies, 55(2), 177-181. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00263206.2018.1538966
  29. Hottell R. A., & Pallister, J. L. (2011). Noteworthy Francophone Women Directors: A Sequel. New York, USA: Lexington Books.
  30. Hubbard, B., & Saad, H. (2018, 7 March). Lebanon elections boost Hezbollah’s clout. The New York Times, Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/07/world/middleeast/lebanon-election-hezbollah.html.
  31. Kaldor, M. (2011), Human security. Society and Economy, 33(3), 441–448.
  32. Nuruzzaman, M. (2013). Human security and the Arab spring. Strategic Analysis, 37(1), 52-64. https://doi.org/10.1 080/09700161.2013.737583
  33. Rizkallah, A. (2017). The paradox of power-sharing: stability and fragility in postwar Lebanon. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40(12), 2058-2076. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1277031
  34. Rubin, B. (2009). Introduction. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Lebanon: Liberation, Conflict, and Crisis (pp. 1-8). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  35. Seghaier, R. (2018). Poverty porn and reproductive injustice: A review of Capernaum. Kohl: A Journal for Body and Gender Research, 4(2), 229-235.
  36. Siklawi, R. (2010). The dynamics of Palestinian political endurance in Lebanon. The Middle East Journal, 64(4), 601-603.
  37. Soffer, A. (1986). Lebanon: Where demography is the core of politics and life. Middle Eastern Studies, 22(2), 197205. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263208608700659
  38. Spyer, J. (2009). Israel and Lebanon: Problematic proximity. In B. Rubin (Ed.), Lebanon: Liberation, Conflict, and Crisis (pp. 195-212). New York, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.
  39. Traboulsi, F. (2012). A History of Modern Lebanon. London, UK: Pluto Press.
  40. Tür, Ö. (2007). The Lebanese war of 2006: Reasons and consequences. Perceptions, 12, 109-122.
  41. UNDP. (1994). Human Development Report 1994. New York, USA: Oxford University Press.
  42. Wallerstein, I. (1997). Eurocentrism and its avatars: The dilemmas of social science. Sociological Bulletin, 46(1), 2139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022919970102
  43. Zenko, M. (2018). US Military policy in the Middle East. London, UK: Chatham House Research Paper.