SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Qualitative Researches within the Field of Tourism According to the Criteria of Trustworthiness

Turizm Alanındaki Nitel Araştırmaların Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Ölçütleri Kapsamında Değerlendirilmesi

Sinan ŞENER
VOLKAN BAHÇECİ
HÜMEYRA DOĞRU
ZEHRA GÖKÇE SEL
MEHMET ERTAŞ
Seren SONGÜR
ÖZKAN TÜTÜNCÜ
Pages
7–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings of the study revealed that the articles published between 1990 and 2007 did not compensate the most of validity and reliability criteria, whereas the ones published after 2007s covered more of these criteria

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Since 1980s, there was an ongoing effort to define some certain criteria in terms of providing validity and reliability in qualitative research.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Particularly in the beginning of 2000s, it was observed that usage of these criteria has been more common.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings of the study revealed that the articles published between 1990 and 2007 did not compensate the most of validity and reliability criteria, whereas the ones published after 2007s covered more of these criteria
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Since 1980s, there was an ongoing effort to define some certain criteria in terms of providing validity and reliability in qualitative research. Particularly in the beginning of 2000s, it was observed that usage of these criteria has been more common. It was important to examine the extent of conformation to these criteria in qualitative studies. In this research, qualitative articles that were published in Journal of Anatolia Tourism Research have been examined in terms of the level of usage of these criteria in qualitative articles. 31 qualitative articles have been identified in this regard. The findings of the study revealed that the articles published between 1990 and 2007 did not compensate the most of validity and reliability criteria, whereas the ones published after 2007s covered more of these criteria

Özet

1980'li yıllardan bu yana nitel araştırmalarda güvenirlik ve geçerliği sağlayabilmek için bazı ölçütler belirlenmeye çalışılmaktadır. Özellikle 2000'lerin başında bu ölçütlerin kullanımının yaygınlaştığı görülmektedir. Bu bakımdan ölçütlerin nitel araştırmalarda ne kadar dikkate alındığının tespiti oldukça önemlidir. Bu çalışmada, Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi'nde yayınlanan nitel çalışmalar incelenmiş ve bunların nitel araştırmalarda kullanılması gereken güvenirlik ve geçerlik ölçütlerini ne düzeyde karşıladıkları saptanmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu kapsamda ilgili dergide yayınlanan ve nitel yöntem kullanıldığı belirlenen toplam 31 çalışma incelemeye alınmıştır. Araştırmanın bulguları, 1990 yılından 2007 yılına kadar yayınlanan çalışmaların, nitel araştırmalar için gerekli olan güvenirlik ve geçerlik ölçütlerinin çoğunu karşılamadığını, öte yandan 2007 yılından sonra bu ölçütlere çalışmalarda daha fazla yer verildiğini göstermiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENER, S., BAHÇECİ, V., DOĞRU, H., SEL, Z. G., ERTAŞ, M., SONGÜR, S., TÜTÜNCÜ, Ö. (2017). Evaluation of Qualitative Researches within the Field of Tourism According to the Criteria of Trustworthiness. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 7–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/147070

References (7)

  1. Anatolia Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi (2016). Hakem Denetimli Makaleler. http://www.anatoliajournal.com/ atad/?sayfa=anasayfa&lang=tr, Erişim Tarihi: 30 Kasım 2015-05 Şubat 2016.
  2. Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating Interpretive Inquiry: Reviewing the Validity Debate and Openning the Dialogue, Qualitative Health Research, 10: 378- 395. Berg, B. L. (2000). Qualitative Research Methods for The Social Science. Boston, MA: Pearson. Brink, H. I. L. (1993). Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research, Curationis, 16 (2): 35-38.
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara:
  4. Pegem Yayıncılık. Carlson, J. A. (2010).
  5. Avoiding Traps in Member Checking, The Qualitative Report, 15 (5): 1102- 1113. Charles, C. M. (1995). Introduction to Educational Research. San Diego: Longman. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among the Five Traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J. W. ve Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry, Theory into Practice, 39 (3): 124-130.
  6. Curtin, M. ve Fossey, E. (2007) Appraising the Trustworthiness of Qualitative Studies: Guidelines for Occupational Therapists, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 54: 88- 94. Daymon, C. ve Holloway, I. (2003). Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications. Londra: Routledge. Decrop, A. (1999). Triangulation in Qualitative Tourism Research, Tourism Management, 20: 157- 161. Denscombe, M. (2010). The Good Research Guide for Small-Scale Social Research Projects. Berkshire: Open University Yayınları.
  7. Devers, K. J. (1999). How Will We Know “Good” Qualitative Research When We See It? Beginning the Dialogue in Health Services Research, HSR: Health Services Research, 34 (5): 1153- 1188. Eisner, E. W. (1991). The Enlightened Eye: Qualitative Inquiry and the Enhancement of Educational Practice. New York: Macmillan. Elliott, R., Fischer, C. T. ve Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving Guidelines for Publication of Qualitative Research Studies in Psychology and Related Fields, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38: 215- 229. Erlandson, D. A., Harris, E. L., Skipper, B. L. ve Allen, S. T. (1993). Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Firestone, W. A. (1993). Alternative Arguments for Generalizing from Data as Applied to Qualitative Research, Edu