Journals / Black Sea Journal of Health Science / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

Primary Healthcare and Gender Equality: Are Preventive Services Truly Balanced?

Yüksel Duygu Altıparmak(YEDİTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-6330-7718
Pages
120–123
Publication Date
2026-05-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Such an approach can make the health system more equitable and help people get diagnosed earlier.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Primary healthcare is considered equitable, economical, and widely accessible in the maintenance of preventive health services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the past, preventive services have largely focused on the health needs of women and children, leading to significant improvements in public health.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Such an approach can make the health system more equitable and help people get diagnosed earlier.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Primary healthcare · Preventive services · Gender equality

Abstract

Primary healthcare is considered equitable, economical, and widely accessible in the maintenance of preventive health services. In the past, preventive services have largely focused on the health needs of women and children, leading to significant improvements in public health. However, this structure has relegated men's regular access to preventive services to a secondary priority. This narrative review aims to highlight the structural inequalities between women-centered and men-centered preventive care provided in primary healthcare settings. A narrative review was prepared based on a literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. International policy documents and reports from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and European health organizations were also examined. Conclusion: The literature shows that preventive services for women are generally standardized, performance-oriented, and integrated into regular follow-up systems, while preventive services for men are predominantly opportunistic and symptom-focused. Recent studies link this inequality to delayed diagnosis, reduced continuity of care, and decreased participation of men in preventive health services. To achieve gender equality in preventive primary healthcare, it is necessary to build upon the progress made in women's health while simultaneously creating organized preventive service packages and performance metrics for men. Such an approach can make the health system more equitable and help people get diagnosed earlier.

Özet

Primary healthcare is considered equitable, economical, and widely accessible in the maintenance of preventive health services. In the past, preventive services have largely focused on the health needs of women and children, leading to significant improvements in public health. However, this structure has relegated men's regular access to preventive services to a secondary priority. This narrative review aims to highlight the structural inequalities between women-centered and men-centered preventive care provided in primary healthcare settings. A narrative review was prepared based on a literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. International policy documents and reports from the World Health Organization (WHO), the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and European health organizations were also examined. Conclusion: The literature shows that preventive services for women are generally standardized, performance-oriented, and integrated into regular follow-up systems, while preventive services for men are predominantly opportunistic and symptom-focused. Recent studies link this inequality to delayed diagnosis, reduced continuity of care, and decreased participation of men in preventive health services. To achieve gender equality in preventive primary healthcare, it is necessary to build upon the progress made in women's health while simultaneously creating organized preventive service packages and performance metrics for men. Such an approach can make the health system more equitable and help people get diagnosed earlier.

🔖

Cite This Article

Altıparmak, Y. D. (2026). Primary Healthcare and Gender Equality: Are Preventive Services Truly Balanced?. Black Sea Journal of Health Science, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 120–123. https://doi.org/10.19127/bshealthscience.1851177

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (25)

  1. Boerma, T., Requejo, J., Victora, C. G., Amouzou, A., George, A., Agyepong, I.,. & Zaidi, S. (2018). Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. The Lancet, 391(10129), 1538-1548.
  2. Braveman, P., Arkin, E., Orleans, T., Proctor, D., Acker, J., & Plough, A. (2018). What is health equity?. Behavioral Science & Policy, 4(1), 1-14.
  3. Coghill, N., Garside, L., Montgomery, A. A., Feder, G., & Horwood, J. (2018). NHS health checks: a cross-sectional observational study on equity of uptake and outcomes. BMC Health Services Research, 18(1), 238. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3027-8
  4. Dore, E. C., Shrivastava, S., & Homan, P. (2024). Structural sexism and preventive health care use in the United States. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 65(1), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221465231194043
  5. Galdas, P. M., Seidler, Z. E., & Oliffe, J. L. (2025). Designing men's health policy: the 5R Framework. The Lancet Public Health, 10(10), e848-e854.
  6. Graf, J., Simoes, E., Kranz, A., Weinert, K., & Abele, H. (2024). The importance of gender-sensitive health care in the context of pain, emergency and vaccination: A narrative review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21010013
  7. Harper, S., Riddell, C. A., & King, N. B. (2021). Declining life expectancy in the United States: missing the trees for the forest. Annual Review of Public Health, 42(1), 381-403.
  8. Harris, M. (2016). The interface between primary health care and population health: challenges and opportunities for prevention. Public Health Research and Practice, 26(1), e2611601. https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp2611601
  9. Hay, K., McDougal, L., Percival, V., Henry, S., Klugman, J., Wurie, H.,. & Gupta, G. R. (2019). Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change. The Lancet, 393(10190), 2535-2549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30648-8
  10. Jackson, D. (2025). Global maternal child health initiatives and programs 1974 to 2023. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 29(8), 1047-1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04121-7
  11. Kaya, Ç. A., Akman, M., Ünalan, P. C., Çifçili, S., Uzuner, A., & Akdeniz, E. (2019). Comparison of preventive health service provision before and afterreorganization of primary care in Turkey: a community-basedstudy. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 20, e119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423619000069
  12. Lindsay, S., & Kolne, K. (2020). The training needs for gender-sensitive care in a pediatric rehabilitation hospital: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education, 20(1), 468. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02384-y
  13. Lu, X., Fu, C., Wang, Q., He, Q., Hee, J., Takesue, R., & Tang, K. (2021). Women’s empowerment and children’s complete vaccination in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: A cross-sectional analysis. Vaccines, 9(10), 1117. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101117
  14. Mursa, R., Patterson, C., & Halcomb, E. (2022). Men's help‐seeking and engagement with general practice: An integrative review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(7), 1938-1953. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15240
  15. Oliffe, J. L., Rossnagel, E., Bottorff, J. L., Chambers, S. K., Caperchione, C., & Rice, S. M. (2020). Community-based men’s health promotion programs: eight lessons learnt and their caveats. Health Promotion International, 35(5), 1230-1240. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daz101
  16. Pavlova, V. (2023). Reasons for the gender wage gap inequality in the example of 13 OECD countries (Bachelor’s thesis, Tallinn University, School of Business and Governance). https://digikogu.taltech.ee/et/Download/2a9cc533-ab08-4e1c-a780-5c04bdad6187/Soolisepalgalhephjused13OECDriiginitel.pdf (accessed date: 23 September 2025).
  17. Peker, Ş., Topuzoğlu, A., Hıdıroğlu, S., & Tanrıöver, Ö. (2025). Understanding the utilization of preventive health services for non-communicable diseases: a qualitative study with community members and family physicians. BMC Primary Care, 26(1), 261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02958-z
  18. Roudsari, R. L., Sharifi, F., & Goudarzi, F. (2023). Barriers to the participation of men in reproductive health care: a systematic review and meta-synthesis. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 818. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15692-x
  19. Seidler, Z. E., Benakovic, R., Wilson, M. J., McGee, M. A., Fisher, K., Smith, J. A., Oliffe, J. L., & Sheldrake, M. (2024). Approaches to engaging men during primary healthcare encounters: A scoping review. American Journal of Men's Health, 18(2), 15579883241241090.
  20. Starfield B. (1998). Primary care: balancing health needs, services, and technology. Oxford University Press.
  21. Torp, S., Eklund, L., & Thorpenberg, S. (2011). Research on workplace health promotion in the Nordic countries: a literature review, 1986–2008. Global Health Promotion, 18(3), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1757975911412401
  22. Vaidya, V., Partha, G., & Karmakar, M. (2012). Gender differences in utilization of preventive care services in the United States. Journal of Women's Health, 21(2), 140-145.
  23. WHO. (2018). World health statistics 2008.
  24. Boerma, T., Requejo, J., Victora, C. G., Amouzou, A., George, A., Agyepong, I.,. & Zaidi, S. (2018). Countdown to 2030: tracking progress towards universal coverage for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health. The Lancet, 391(10129), 1538-1548.
  25. Hay, K., McDougal, L., Percival, V., Henry, S., Klugman, J., Wurie, H.,. & Gupta, G. R. (2019). Disrupting gender norms in health systems: making the case for change. The Lancet, 393(10190), 2535-2549. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30648-8