SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilgisayar Bilimleri / 2021 / Cilt: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Sayı: Special Özel Sayı

A Comparative Performance Evaluations of SC and MC VLC Systems in Underwater Environments

Mehmet Murat Güçlü(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-4910-2820
Burak Besceli(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0003-0897-0223
Efecan Polat(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0001-7322-9840
Timurhan Devellioğlu(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-8302-0351
Gökberk Tamer(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0001-9887-327X
Nuh Mehmet Küçükusta(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0001-6808-2477
Enver Faruk Tanrıkulu(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0002-2667-1262
Ali Özen(NUH NACI YAZGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)0000-0003-3232-3181
Pages
19–26
Publication Date
2021-10-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that SC-VLC communication system has approximately 8 dB better performance than MC-VLC communication system in both channel environments.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) visible light communication (VLC) schemes in underwater optical channel environments are performed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC VLC communication systems in underwater optical LOS and N-LOS channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) success benchmark.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that SC-VLC communication system has approximately 8 dB better performance than MC-VLC communication system in both channel environments.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:underwater environment · visible light communications · underwater optical channel

Abstract

In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) visible light communication (VLC) schemes in underwater optical channel environments are performed. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC VLC communication systems in underwater optical LOS and N-LOS channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) success benchmark. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that SC-VLC communication system has approximately 8 dB better performance than MC-VLC communication system in both channel environments.

Özet

In this study, comparative performance analyzes of single carrier (SC) and multi carrier (MC) visible light communication (VLC) schemes in underwater optical channel environments are performed. Computer simulation studies are carried out to compare SC and MC VLC communication systems in underwater optical LOS and N-LOS channel environments based on bit error rate (BER) success benchmark. From the acquired outcomes, it is perceived that SC-VLC communication system has approximately 8 dB better performance than MC-VLC communication system in both channel environments.

🔖

Cite This Article

Güçlü, M. M., Besceli, B., Polat, E., Devellioğlu, T., Tamer, G., Tanrıkulu, E. F., Özen, A. (2021). A Comparative Performance Evaluations of SC and MC VLC Systems in Underwater Environments. Bilgisayar Bilimleri, Cilt: IDAP-2021 : 5th International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing symposium Sayı: Special Özel Sayı, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.53070/bbd.990734

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Arnon S., Barry J., Karagiannidis G., Schober R., and Uysal M. (2012), Advanced Optical Wireless Communication Systems. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press.
  2. Elamassie M., Karbalayghareh M., Miramirkhani F., Uysal M., Abdallah M. and Qaraqe K. (2019), Resource allocation for downlink OFDMA in underwater visible light communications, 2019 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking (BlackSeaCom), pp.1-6.
  3. Güçlü M. M. (2021), Investigation of SC and MC Visible Light Communication Systems in Underwater Optical Channel Environments, Bachelor Degree Thesis, Nuh Naci Yazgan University – HARGEM, Kayseri, TURKEY, June 2021.
  4. Kong M., Lv W., Ali T., Sarwar R., Yu C., Qiu Y., Qu F., Xu Z., Han J. and Xu J. (2017), 10-m 9.51-Gb/s RGB laser diodes-based WDM underwater wireless optical communication, Opt. Express, 25(17), pp. 20 829–20 834.
  5. Miramirkhani F. and Uysal M. (2018), Visible light communication channel modeling for underwater environments with blocking and shadowing, IEEE Access Journal, vol. 6, pp.1082-1090.
  6. Miramirkhani F. (2018), Channel Modelling and Characterization for Visible Light Communications: Indoor, Vehicular and Underwater Channels, Ph.D. Thesis, Ozyegin University, May 2018, İstanbul, TURKEY.
  7. Nakamura K., Mizukoshi I., and Hanawa M. (2015), Optical wireless transmission of 405 nm, 1.45 Gbit/s optical IM/DD-OFDM signals through a 4.8 m underwater channel, Opt. Express, 23(2), pp. 1558–1566.
  8. Shen C., Guo Y., Oubei H. M., Ng T. K., Liu G., Park K.-H., Ho K.-T., Alouini M.-S., and Ooi B. S. (2016), 20-meter underwater wireless optical communication link with 1.5 Gbps data rate, Opt. Express, 24(22), pp. 25 502–25 509.
  9. Yesilkaya A., Miramirkhani F., Alsan H. F., Basar E., Panayirci E. and Uysal M. (2015), Modelling of visible light channels and performance analysis for optical OFDM systems, EMO Scientific Journal, 5(9), pp. 18-29.
  10. Zeng Z., Fu S., Zhang H., Dong Y. and Cheng J. (2017), A survey of underwater optical wireless communications, IEEE Communications Surveys Tutorials, 19(1), pp. 204-238.