SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies / 2009 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Gruplar arası uyuşmazlıKların sosyal KİmlİK Boyutu

THE SOCIAL IDENTITY DIMENSION OF INTER-GROUP CONFLICTS

Muzaffer Yılmaz YILMAZ
Pages
75–85
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The need for further research into conditions that may tie the dynamics of social identity to expressed inter-group conflicts in a clearer way is urged.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to provide an analytical discussion for inter-group conflicts in the context of the social identity phenomenon, a rather neglected dimension of social conflict.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study reveals that social identity is related to inter-group conflicts by leading to stereotyping, ethnocentric behaviors, and inter-group competitions, offering, thus, a useful framework in capturing many social-psychological aspects of these conflicts.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The need for further research into conditions that may tie the dynamics of social identity to expressed inter-group conflicts in a clearer way is urged.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This article aims to provide an analytical discussion for inter-group conflicts in the context of the social identity phenomenon, a rather neglected dimension of social conflict. The study reveals that social identity is related to inter-group conflicts by leading to stereotyping, ethnocentric behaviors, and inter-group competitions, offering, thus, a useful framework in capturing many social-psychological aspects of these conflicts. It is noted, however, that social identity, by itself, is not a direct cause of overt inter-group conflicts. The need for further research into conditions that may tie the dynamics of social identity to expressed inter-group conflicts in a clearer way is urged.

Özet

Bu makale, sosyal uyuşmazlıkların genellikle göz ardı edilen bir boyutu olan sosyal kimlik çerçevesinde, gruplar arası uyuşmazlıklara ilişkin analitik bir tartışma ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, sosyal kimliğin önyargılara, grup merkeziyetçiliğine ve gruplar arası rekabete yol açması nedeniyle gruplar arası uyuşmazlıklarla ilişkili olduğu, bu yüzden de bu tür uyuşmazlıkların bir takım sosyopsikolojik boyutlarını kavrama bağlamında yararlı bir yaklaşım sunduğu belirtilmektedir. Bununla birlikte, sosyal kimliğin gruplar arası uyuşmazlıkların doğrudan bir nedeni olmadığına işaret edilmekte ve sosyal kimlik dinamikleri ile açık gruplar arası uyuşmazlıkları ilişkilendiren koşulların ileri araştırmalarla ortaya konması gereği vurgulanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M. Y. (2009). Gruplar arası uyuşmazlıKların sosyal KİmlİK Boyutu. Bogazici Journal: Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 75–85. https://ajindex.com/articles/146300

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abrams, D. and Hogg, M.A. (1999). Social Identity and Social Cognition. Malden, Mass: Blackwell. Allen, B.J. (2004).
  2. Difference Matters. Long Grove, II: Waveland Press.
  3. Allison, S. T. and Messick, D. M. (1985). "The Group Attribution Error," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, (2): 563-579.
  4. Barash, D. and Webel, C. (2002). Peace and Conflict Studies. London: Sage Publications. Barsalou, J.M. (2002). Islamic Extremists: How Do They Mobilize Support? Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace Press.
  5. Cote, J.E. (2006). "Acculturation and Identity: The Role of Individualization Theory," Human Development, (49): 31-35.
  6. Davidson, L. (2003). Islamic Fundamentalism: An Introduction. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.
  7. Davis, J.E. (2000). Identity and Social Change. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  8. Festinger, L. (1954). "A Theory of Social Comparison Processes," Human Relations, (7): 117-140.
  9. Gemmill, G. (1998). "The Dynamics of Scapegoating in Small Groups," Small Group Behavior, (20): 418. Gurr, T.R. and Davies, J. (2002). "Dynamics and Management of Ethnopolitical Conflicts," in J. Davies and E. Kaufman (eds.), Second Track/Citizen's Diplomacy: Concepts and Techniques for Conflict Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield. Haslam, A.S. (2001). Psychology in Organizations: The Social Identity Approach. London: Sage Publications. Haslam, A.S. (2003). Social Identity at Work. New York: Psychology Press.
  10. Horowitz, D.L. (1985). Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  11. Jenkins, R. (2004). Social Identity. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge. Jeong, H. (2002). Peace and Conflict Studies: An Introduction. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. Keen, S. (1986).
  12. Faces of the Enemy. San Francisco, CA: Harper Collins. Lee, Y.T., Jussim, L.J., and McCauley, C.R. (1995).
  13. Stereotype Accuracy. Washington, DC: American Psychology Association. Mitchell, C.R. (1998). The Structure of International Conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press.
  14. Petersson B. and Clark E. (2003). Identity Dynamics and Construction of Boundaries. Lund, Sweden: Nordic Academic. Pruitt, D.G., Kim, S.H., and Rubin, J.Z. (2004). Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. Rayner, E. (2005). Human Development: An Introduction to the Psychodynamics of Growth, Maturity and Ageing. New York: Routledge. Ryan, S. (1995). Ethnic Conflict and International Relations. Brookfield, Vermont: Dartmouth Publishing Com. Sen, A.K. (2006). Identity and Violence.