Journals / Bezmiâlem Science / 2019 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of Third Generation Proximal Femoral Nails in Treatment of Reverse Oblique Intertrochanteric Fractures

Üçüncü Nesil Proksimal Femur Çiviler ile Tedavi Edilen Ters Oblik İntertrokanterik Kırıkların Sonuçları

Pages
271–275
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

More screw migration was seen in PFNA than Intertan nails after the operation in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the treatment results of reverse oblique AO/OTA 31A1 fractures that have highly mechanical instability risk with two third generation intramedullary nails.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Twenty-eight patients (8 men, 20 women) treated by third generation proximal femoral nails [proximal femoral anti-rotation (PFNA)® or Intertan®] followed minimum one year were included.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:More screw migration was seen in PFNA than Intertan nails after the operation in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the treatment results of reverse oblique AO/OTA 31A1 fractures that have highly mechanical instability risk with two third generation intramedullary nails. Methods: Twenty-eight patients (8 men, 20 women) treated by third generation proximal femoral nails [proximal femoral anti-rotation (PFNA)® or Intertan®] followed minimum one year were included. Average age was 65.0 (31-93) years. Clinical and radiological results, screw migration at one year and complications were recorded. Results: Mean operation time was 72.2 and 72.5 minutes, flouroscopy time was 64.4 and 64.7 seconds, mobilisation time was 2.1 and 2.2 days, full weight bearing time was 8.6 and 8.5 weeks, tip-apex distance was 20.1 and 20.2 mm, fracture healing time was 10.5 and 10.2 weeks, Harris hip score at one year was 80.5 and 83.5, neck-shaft angle difference at one year was 1.6 and 1.1 mm, screw migration at one year was found in 10 and 3 patients and mean migration distance was 3.1 and 0.4 mm for PFNA and Intertan nails respectively. No complications recorded that needs secondary intervention. Fracture healing obtained in all patients. Conclusion: Reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures can be effectively treated with third generation intramedullary nails. More screw migration was seen in PFNA than Intertan nails after the operation in this study.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı yüksek mekanik instabilitesi olan AO/OTA 31A1 kırıklarda iki 3. nesil intramedüller çivinin tedavi sonuçlarını değerlendirmektir. Yöntemler: Yirmi sekiz hasta (8 erkek, 20 kadın) 3. nesil proksimal femur çivileri ile tedavi edildi [proksimal femoral anti-rotasyon (PFNA)® veya Intertan®]. Hastalar minimum 1 yıl takip edildi. Ortalama yaş 65,0’dı (31-93). Klinik ve radyolojik sonuçlar, 1. yıldaki çivi migrasyonu ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Bulgular: PFNA ve Intertan çivilerinde sırasıyla ortalama operasyon süresi 72,2 ve 72,5 dakika, fluroskopi süresi 64,4 ve 64,7 saniye, mobilizasyon süresi 2,1 ve 2,2 gün, tam yük verme süresi 8,6 ve 8,5 hafta, tepe-uç mesafesi 20,1 ve 20,2 mm, kırık iyileşme süresi 10,5 ve 10,2 hafta, 1. yıldaki Harris kalça skoru 80,5 ve 83,5, 1. yıldaki boyun-şaft açı farkı 1,6 ve 1,1 mm, 1. yılda 10 ve 3 hastada görülen çivi migrasyon mesafesi ortalama 3,1 ve 0,4 mm idi. İkinci müdahale gerektiren komplikasyon meydana gelmedi. Bütün hastalarda kırık iyileşmesi sağlandı. Sonuç: Ters oblik intertrokanterik kırıklar 3. nesil çiviler ile efektif olarak tedavi edilebilir. Bu çalışmada, ameliyat sonrası PFNA çivilerde Intertan çivilere göre daha fazla çivi migrasyonu görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜLKÜ, T., TOK, O., SEYHAN, M., GERELİ, A., KAYA, A. (2019). Comparison of Third Generation Proximal Femoral Nails in Treatment of Reverse Oblique Intertrochanteric Fractures. Bezmiâlem Science, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 4, 271–275. https://ajindex.com/articles/146260

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Sener M, Onar V, Kazımoğlu C, Yağdi S. Mortality and morbidity in elderly patients who underwent partial prosthesis replacement for proximal femoral fractures. Eklem Hastalık Cerrahisi 2009;20:11-7
  2. Weller I, Wai EK, Jaglal S, Kreder HJ. The effect of hospital type and surgical delay on mortality after surgery for hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005;87:361-6
  3. Rodop O, Mahiroğulları M, Tırmık Ü, Keklikçi K, Sen H. The increasing incidence of intertrochanteric fractures synchronous with older age. Eklem Hastalık Cerrahisi 2009;20:131-5
  4. Min WK, Kim SY, Kim TK, Lee KB, Cho MR, Ha YC, et al. Proximal femoral nail for the treatment of reverse obliquity intertrochanteric fractures compared with gamma nail. J Trauma 2007;63:1054-60
  5. Jacobs RR, McClain O, Armstrong HJ. Internal fixation of intertrochanteric hip fractures: a clinical and biomechanical study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;146:62-70
  6. Nuber S, Schonweiss T, Ruter A. Stabilisation of unstable trochanteric femoral fractures. Dynamic hip screw (DHS) with trochanteric stabilisation plate vs. proximal femur nail (PFN). Unfallchirurg 2003;106:39-47
  7. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. (2008) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;16:CD000093
  8. Cheema GS, Rastogi A, Singh V, Goel SC, Mishra D, Arora S. Comparison of cutout resistance of dynamic condylar screw and proximal femoral nail in reverse oblique trochanteric fractures: A biomechanical study. Indian J Orthop 2012;46:259-65
  9. Simmermacher RK, Ljungqvist J, Bail H, Hockertz T, Vochteloo AJ, Ochs U, et al. The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 2008;39:932-9
  10. Soucanye de Landevoisin E, Bertani A, Candoni P, Charpail C, Demortiere E. Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFN-ATM) fixation of extra-capsular proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: retrospective study in 102 patients. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2012;98:288-95
  11. Sahin S, Ertürer E, Oztürk I, Toker S, Seçkin F, Akman S. Radiographic and functional results of osteosynthesis using the proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2010;44:127-34
  12. Yaozeng X, Dechun G, Huilin Y, Guangming Z, Xianbin W. Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotat