Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2010 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

A Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble credit scoring techniques in evaluating credit card loan applications

Kredi kartı taleplerinin değerlendirilmesinde grup ve bireysel kredi puanlama modellerinin karşılaştırılmalı bir analizi

Pages
75–90
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study explores the performance of both individual models by using neural networks, and classification and regression trees and ensemble models by using Bagging and Adaboost techniques.Experimental studies using real world data sets have demonstrated that the ensemble models outperform the other credit scoring models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the main tasks of a bank is to lend money.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a financial intermediary, one of its roles is to reduce lending risks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study explores the performance of both individual models by using neural networks, and classification and regression trees and ensemble models by using Bagging and Adaboost techniques.Experimental studies using real world data sets have demonstrated that the ensemble models outperform the other credit scoring models.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

One of the main tasks of a bank is to lend money. As a financial intermediary, one of its roles is to reduce lending risks. Bank lending is an art as well as a science. Success depends on techniques used, knowledge and on an aptitude to assess both credit-worthiness of apotential borrower and the merits of the proposition to be financed. In recent years, banks have increasingly used credit-scoring techniques to evaluate the loan applications they receive from consumers. Credit-scoring techniques are usually based on discriminant models or related techniques, such as logit or probit models or neural networks, in which several variables are used jointly to set up a numerical score for each loan applicant. This study explores the performance of both individual models by using neural networks, and classification and regression trees and ensemble models by using Bagging and Adaboost techniques.Experimental studies using real world data sets have demonstrated that the ensemble models outperform the other credit scoring models.

Özet

Kredilendirme, bankacılığın en temel işlevi olmakla birlikte aynı zamanda en riskli faaliyetlerinden biridir. Bu nedenle bankaların, kredilendirme faaliyetlerini verimli ve kredilerin geri dönmemesinden doğabilecek zararları en az düzeyde tutulabilecek şekilde yürütmeleri gerekir. Bankalar, bu sebeple, son yıllarda ayrıştırma analizi, logit ve probit modelleri ya da sınıflama ve regresyon ağaçları ve yapay sinir ağları gibi çeşitli teknikler yardımı ile kredilendirme faaliyetlerinde hızlı ve sağlıklı karar verilmesini sağlayan kredi puanlama sistemini kullanmaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın amacı, grup modelleri ile bireysel kredi puanlama modellerin performanslarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, yapay sinir ağları ve karar ağaçları teknikleri kullanılarak geliştirilmiş bireysel modeller ile Bagging ve Adaboost teknikleri ile elde edilmiş grup modelleri kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analiz ve değerlendirmeler sonucu grup kredi puanlama modellerinin bireysel modellere üstünlük sağladığı görülmüştür.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNCE, H., AKTAN, B. (2010). A Comparative analysis of individual and ensemble credit scoring techniques in evaluating credit card loan applications. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 75–90. https://ajindex.com/articles/146220

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Akgüç, Ö. (2007). Banka Yönetimi ve Performans Analizi. Arayış Basım ve Yayıncılık: İstanbul. 2.Akpınar, H. (2000). Veri Tabanlı Bilgi Keşfi ve Veri Madenciliği. İ.Ü. İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 29.(1): 1-22. 3.Avery, R. B., Calerh, P. S. ve Canner, G. B. (2004). Consumer Credit Scoring: Do Situational Circumstances Matter? Journal of Banking and Finance, 28:835-856. 4.Aydın, N. (Ed.). (2006). Bankacılık Uygulamaları. Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını, No. 1711. 5.Bates, J.M. ve Granger, C.W.J. (1969). The Combination of Forecasts. Operational Research Quarterly, 20 (4): 451-468. 6.Bankacılık Denetleme ve Düzenleme Kurumu, (2009) Aylık Bülten Ocak 2009. www.bddk.org.tr. 7.Benediktsson, J. A., Sveinsson, J. R., Ersoy, O. K. ve Swain, P. H. (1997). Parallel Consensual Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 8:54-64. 8.Berk, N. (2001). Bankacılıkta Pazara Yönelik Kredi Talebi, Beta Basım Yayın: İstanbul. 9.Blochlinger, A. ve Leippold, M. (2006). Economic Benefit of Powerful Credit Scoring. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30: 851-873. 10.Bodur, C. ve Teker, S. (2005). Credit Scoring of Companies: Application to the İSEM Companies. İTÜ Dergisi/b, 2(1): 25-36. 11.Breiman, L, Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A. ve Stone, C. J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Montery. 12.Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning, 24 (3): 123-140. 13.Chang, C. L. ve Chen, C. H. (2008). Applying Decision Tree and Neural Network to Increase Quality of Dermatologic Diagnosis. Expert Systems with Applications, 3(6): 4035-4041. 14.Chen, M. S., Han, J. ve Yu, P. S,. (1996). Data Mining: An Overview From a Database Perspective. IEEE Trans. Knowledge Data Engineering, 8(6): 866-883. 15.Chen, S. Y. ve Liu, X. (2004). The Contribution of Data Mining to Information Science. Journal of Information Science, 30(6): 550-558. 16.Çinko, M. (2006). Kredi Kartı Değerlendirme Tekniklerinin Karşılaştırılması. İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5 (9): 143-153. 17.Crook, J. ve Banasik, J. (2004). Does Reject Inference Really Improve the Performance of Application Scoring Models? Journal of Banking and Finance, 28: 857-874. 18.Crook, J. N., Edelman, D. B. ve Thomas, L. C. (2007). Recent Developments in Consumer Credit Risk Assessment. European Journal of Operational Research, No. 183. 19.Fayyad, U., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G. ve Smyth, P. (1996). The KDD Process for Extracting Useful Knowledge From Volumes of Data. Co