Journals / Alternatif Politika / 2017 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3

RETHINKING, RETURNING, REFLECTING

Pages
325–342
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Recalling three ‘imagined’ critical conversations – regarding empirical criteria, epistemological frames and normative/political strategies – I then reflect on the feminist journey of many into, within, and increasingly beyond the constraining boundaries of disciplinary IR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:After almost four decades of feminist International Relations (IR), I here rethink the journey this has entailed – for myself and others -- and contemplate where it has taken us.
📊
Key Findings & Data:I first consider my own introduction to the discipline of IR and interpret activist commitments of the ‘first generation’ of participants.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Recalling three ‘imagined’ critical conversations – regarding empirical criteria, epistemological frames and normative/political strategies – I then reflect on the feminist journey of many into, within, and increasingly beyond the constraining boundaries of disciplinary IR.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

After almost four decades of feminist International Relations (IR), I here rethink the journey this has entailed – for myself and others -- and contemplate where it has taken us. I first consider my own introduction to the discipline of IR and interpret activist commitments of the ‘first generation’ of participants. I then return to early developments and initial questions that fostered boundary-transgressing feminist contributions. Recalling three ‘imagined’ critical conversations – regarding empirical criteria, epistemological frames and normative/political strategies – I then reflect on the feminist journey of many into, within, and increasingly beyond the constraining boundaries of disciplinary IR.

🔖

Cite This Article

PETERSON, V. S. (2017). RETHINKING, RETURNING, REFLECTING. Alternatif Politika, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 3, 325–342. https://ajindex.com/articles/146052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ackerly, Brooke A., Maria Stern and Jacqui True (Eds.) (2006), Feminist Methodologies for International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). Agathangelou, Anna M. and L. H. M. Ling (2004), “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism”, International Studies Review, 6 (21): 21-49.
  2. Agathangelou, Anna M. and L. H. M. Ling (2009), Transforming World Politics: From Empire to Multiple Worlds (London and New York: Routledge). Ahall, L and L. J. Shepherd (Eds.) (2012),
  3. Gender, Agency and Political Violence (Rethinking Political Violence) (London: Palgrave Macmillan). Alexander, M. Jacqui and Chandra Talpade Mohanty (Eds.) (1997),
  4. Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures (New York: Routledge). Ashley, Richard K. and R. B. J. Walker (Eds.) (1990), “Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, 34 (3): 259-268.
  5. Bleier, Ruth (1984), Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women (Oxford: Pergamon). Bordo, Susan (1988), “Feminist Skepticism and the "Maleness" of Philosophy”, The Journal of Philosophy, 85 (11): 619-626.
  6. Brown, Wendy (1988), Manhood and Politics (Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield). Carver, Terrell (2003), “Gender and International Relations”, International Studies Review, 5 (2): 287-302. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (1982), The Empire Strikes Back (London: Hutchinson). Chodorow, Nancy (1978), The Reproduction of Mothering (Berkeley: University of California Press). Chowdhry, Geeta and Sheila Nair (Eds.) (2002),
  7. Power, Postcolonialism and International Relations: Reading Race, Gender and Class (New York: Routledge). Cockburn, Cynthia (2010), “Gender Relations as Causal in Militarization and War”, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 12 (2): 139-157.
  8. Cohn, Carol (1987), “Sex and Death in the Rational World of Defense Intellectuals”, Signs, 12: 687-718.
  9. Combahee River Collective (1979), In Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism, Eisenstein, Zillah (Ed.) (New York and London: Monthly Review Press). Crenshaw, Kimberle (1991), “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence Against Women of Color”, Stanford Law Review, 43: 1241-1299.
  10. Eisenstein, Zillah R. (1981), The Radical Future of Liberal Feminism (Boston: Northeastern University Press). Enloe, Cynthia (1983), Does Khaki Become You? (Boston: South End Press). Enloe, Cynthia (1990), Banan