Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Planning dilemmas in deindustrialization process in İstanbul

Pages
43–56
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A critical assessment will be made on the role of the Master plan and local zoning plans on deindustrialization process and reactions of local industrial companies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The last two Master Plans of Istanbul Metropolitan Area targeted to transform Istanbul into a primary city as a cultural and financial center in its region, and a competitive city at the global level.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This planning objective mandated to concen-trate on the development of high-level services sector in some targeted sub-met-ropolitan areas while leaving low value-added and labor intensive industrial sec-tors outside the city limits.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A critical assessment will be made on the role of the Master plan and local zoning plans on deindustrialization process and reactions of local industrial companies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The last two Master Plans of Istanbul Metropolitan Area targeted to transform Istanbul into a primary city as a cultural and financial center in its region, and a competitive city at the global level. This planning objective mandated to concen-trate on the development of high-level services sector in some targeted sub-met-ropolitan areas while leaving low value-added and labor intensive industrial sec-tors outside the city limits. In this paper, the relationship between the ongoing industrial decentralization process and the vision of Istanbul Metropolitan Master Plan for 2023 are examined. As noted above in many parts of the city the existing industrial facilities with considerable employment bases, face pressure to relocate their facility to some selected Industrial Parks or in many cases to off-limits of the Metropolitan Area. However, those industrial areas to face relocation are located closely to residential areas where their major source of the workforce lives. The paper will examine the assumptions of the İstanbul Metropolitan Master Plan of 2009 on the transformation of industrial areas with reference to Halkalı Street Industrial districts. A critical assessment will be made on the role of the Master plan and local zoning plans on deindustrialization process and reactions of local industrial companies.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERBİL, T. (2017). Planning dilemmas in deindustrialization process in İstanbul. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 43–56. https://ajindex.com/articles/145560

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aysan, M. ve Dökmeci, V., (1995), The Decentralization of the Industry and its Impact on Urban Transporta-tion in Istanbul, I.T.U. Research Fund, Istanbul Bezmez, D., (2008), The Politics of Urban Waterfront Regeneration: The Case Of Haliç (The Golden Horn), Is-tanbul, IJURR, 32, 4, 8155-840.
  2. Castells, M. (1991),
  3. The Informa-tional City, Blackwell. Castells, M. (2006),
  4. The theory of Network Society, Cambridge. Çakılcıoğlu, M. (2014),
  5. The Master Plan Problem, Retrieved from www.kentplanlama.org, 20.02.2016.
  6. Doğan, M. (2013), Industrialization in Istanbul from Past to Present, Mar-mara Geography Journal, 27(1), 511-550.
  7. Doğruel, F., Doğruel, S. (2010),
  8. The Deindustrialization of Istanbul, MPRA Paper, http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen. de/27070/, 14.5.2017. Florida R, (2002) “The Economic Geography of Talent”, Annals of the As-sociation of American Geographers, 92, 743-755. Florida R L, (2004) Cities and the creative class (Routledge, London) Friedmann J, (1995), “The world city hypothesis”, World cities in a world sys-tem, P L Knox, P J Taylor, Cambridge University Press,
  9. Cambridge. Gökşen, T. (2015), Neoliberal Urban Restructuring Accelerated: Gentrifica-tion in Karaköy, (Unpublished Doc-toral Dissertation), Central European University, Budapest. IMP 2009
  10. Report (2009),
  11. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Istanbul IMP 1995 Report, (1995),
  12. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Istanbul IMP 1980 Report, (1980),
  13. Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Istanbul Koparan, A. (2017), Personal Interview, 5.6.2017.
  14. Mamunlu, Hale, (2009), Istan-bul Kentsel Bölgesinde Sürdürülebilir Gelişme Bağlamında Havza Planlama ve Yönetim Yaklaşımı: Küçükçekmece Göl Havzası Örneği, 33. Dünya Şehirci-lik Günü Kolokyumu, Istanbul. Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology, (2016),
  15. OIZ Info Site, Re-trieved from www.osbbs.sanayi.gov.tr Ministry of Environment, (2007), The 2006 Annual Report on Environ-mental Conditions in Istanbul, Min.of Env.Istanbul Directorate. Ocakçı, M. (1989), Manufacturing industry and metropolitan city relations in the process of metropolitaniza-tion, (Unpublished doctoral disser-tation), ITU Graduate School of Sci., Eng. and Tech., Istanbul. Öktem, B. (2011), Socio-spatial Re-flections of Neoliberal Urbanization Model in Istanbul, I.U. Journal of Fac-ulty of Political Science, 44(3). 23-40.
  16. Pratt, A.,C. (2008). Questioning the relationship between Advanced Pro-ducers Services, the Cultural Industries and Global Cities, in Leriche, F. et al., L’économie culturelle et