Journals / A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3

Regional inequality and international trade in Turkey: A dynamic spatial panel approach

Pages
25–39
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Imports, on the other hand, have an opposite effect.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of the present article 1 is to investigate the impact of trade liberalization on the evolution of regional income inequalities in Turkey between 2004-2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, it is not only ‘trade’ per se that can affect the regional economies but the composition of trade is also of great importance (Rodriquez-Pose and Gill, 2006).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Imports, on the other hand, have an opposite effect.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim of the present article 1 is to investigate the impact of trade liberalization on the evolution of regional income inequalities in Turkey between 2004-2011. Despite the large body of literature on this subject, there exists several directions which needs to be further explored. i. so far in the literature, the concept of trade openness is too broadly defined. However, it is not only ‘trade’ per se that can affect the regional economies but the composition of trade is also of great importance (Rodriquez-Pose and Gill, 2006). Indeed, it can be partitioned into two components, such as exports and imports. We analyze separately the impact of each component on the evolution of regional inequalities. ii. in most of the empirical studies dealing with this issue, neighboring regions are assumed to have no spatial economic interconnection between each other. We, therefore, incorporate spatial spillovers of trade and growth into our analysis. Our results are summa- rized in two groups: First, regional inequalities in Turkey are quite sizable but tend to decline over the period of analyses. Second, initially poorer regions that experi- ence an export-based liberalization tend to grow faster than richer ones. Imports, on the other hand, have an opposite effect.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURAN, H. E. (2017). Regional inequality and international trade in Turkey: A dynamic spatial panel approach. A|Z ITU Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 3, 25–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/145551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Aghion, P., Burgess, R., Redding, S., BOE;JMJCPUUJ ' ćF 6OFRVBM &ČFDUT PG -JCFSBMJ[BUJPO ćFPSZ BOE Evidence from India. Society for Economic Dynamics, Discussion Paper /P "OTFMJO - 4QBUJBM &DPOPNFUSJDT.FUIPETBOE.PEFMT4UVEJFT JO0QFSBUJPOBM3FHJPOBM4DJFODF7PMume 4, Springer #BZQ‘OBS.# &SLVU ( Ekonomik Küreselleşme ve Türkiye’de Bölgesel Üretkenlik DüzeylerindF:BL‘OTBNBɗ5Ã%FSHJTJ".JNBSM‘L 1MBOMBNB5BTBS‘N #BMUBHJ ) &DPOPNFUSJD Analysis of Panel Data. 5th Edition, Wiley Blackwell #BSSP 3 + 4BMBJ.BSUJO 9 $POWFSHFODF+PVSOBMPG1PMJUJDBM&DPOPNZ #BSSP3+4BMBJ.BSUJO9 $POWFSHFODF BDSPTT 4UBUFT BOE 3Fgions. Brookings Papers on Economic "DUJWJUZ #SàMIBSU. ćF TQBUJBM FGfects of trade openness: a survey. ReWJFXPG8PSME&DPOPNJDTo #SàMIBSU.$BSSFSF$5SJPOGFUUJ F., (2010). How wages and employment adjust to trade liberalisation: Quasi-experimental evidence from Austria,.JNFP6OJWFSTJUZPG-BVTBOOF #FO%BWJE % 5FBDI ZPVS $IJMESFO 8FMM 1MBOUJOH UIF 4FFET PG Education and Harvesting the Benefits of Trade. Paper 2000-5, Tel-Aviv University. #PSBUBW,:FMEBO &,ÚTF " (MPCBMJ[BUJPO %JTUSJCVUJPO BOE 4PDJBM 1PMJDZ 5VSLFZ $&1"8PSLJOH1BQFS4FSJFT* $IJRVJBS % 8IZ.FYJDPT regional income convergence broke down. Journal of Development EcoOPNJDTo $PF%5)FMQNBO& *Oternational R&D Spillovers. European &DPOPNJD3FWJFX $SP[FU.,PFOJH4PVCFZSBO 1 (2004). Trade liberalization and the internal geography of countries. In:.BZFS 5.VDDIJFMMJ +- FET.VMUJnational firms’ location and economic HFPHSBQIZ&EXBSE&MHBS$IFMUFOIBN %BVNBM. ćF *NQBDU PG Trade Openness on Regional InequaliUZćF$BTFTPG*OEJBBOE#SB[JM*OUFSOBUJPOBM5SBEF+PVSOBM o %BVNBM.0[ZVSU4 ćF Impact of International Trade Flows on Economic Growth in Brazilian States. Review of Economics and Institutions, 2(1), 1-25. %PHSVFM'%PHSVFM4 5VSkiye’de bolgesel gelir farkliliklari ve CàZàNF*LUJTBUÃ[FSJOF:B[‘MBS,PSLVU #PSBUBWB"SNBHBO*MFUJTJN:BZ‘OMBS‘ Dollar, D., Kraay, A., (2004). Trade, (SPXUI BOE 1PWFSUZ ćF &DPOPNJD +PVSOBM Duran E. H. (2014). Short run dynamics of income disparities and regional cycle synchronization in the U.S. (SPXUIBOE$IBOHF &MWFSFO": 8BHFJOFRVBMJUZ in Turkey: Decomposition by statistical SFHJPOT o 3FWJFX PG 6SCBO and Regional Development Studies, o Erdem, U. (2016). Regional Human $BQJUBM%JTUSJCVUJPOBOE%JTQBSJUJFTJO Turkey. Review of Urban and Regional Development Studies. doi: 10.1111/ SVSE Erdem U. (2015). Spatial effects of trade openness: Regional inequality, trade openness and liberal trade poliDJFTJO5VSLFZ.BTUFSćFTJT*[NJS*OTUJUVUFPG5