Journals / Current Research in Dental Sciences / 2008 / Cilt: 2008 Sayı: 1

THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS FINISHING / POLISHING

FARKLI BİTİRME VE PARLATMA İŞLEMLERİNİN ÜÇ FARKLI RESİN MATERYALİN YÜZEY PÜRÜZLÜLÜĞÜ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Pages
19–24
Publication Date
2008-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗

Abstract

-

Özet

Amaç: Bitirme ve parlatma i lemleri, yap$lan restoras- yonun ömrünün uzat$lmas$nda önemli bir etkendir. Çal$ mam$z$n amac$ çe itli bitirme/parlatma sistemle- rinin, üç farkl$ resin materyalinin yüzey pürüzlülü;ü üzerine etkisini kar $la t$rmakt$r.Gereç ve Yöntem: Estetik restorasyon- larda kullan$lan 3 materyalden teflon kal$plar (8mm çap$nda 5mm yüksekli;inde) kullan$larak 54 adet disk örnek haz$rland$; Hibrit kompozit (Valux Plus), kondanse edilebilir kompozit (Alert), ormocer (Admira).Her bir materyalden 18 adet örnek haz$rland$ ve s$radan ekilde 3 gruba ayr$ld$. (n=6). Her gruba farkl$ bitirme/ parlatma sistemleri (Elmas bitirme frezleri, Sof-Lex diskleri, Astropol sistemi) uyguland$. Her örnek yüzeyinde Mitutoyo Surfcorder /SE-40D profilometre cihaz$ ile ortalama yüzey pürüzlülü;ü de;erleri (Ra) elde edildi ve veriler çift yönlü ANOVA ve Duncan testi ile de;erlendirildi. Bulgular ve Sonuç: Üç bitirme/cila sisteminin ortalama Ra de;erleri aras$ndaki fark önemli bulundu.(p

🔖

Cite This Article

İlday, A. G. D. N. Ö., Erdem, A. G. D. V., Bayındır, D. D. Y. Z. (2008). THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS FINISHING / POLISHING. Current Research in Dental Sciences, Cilt: 2008 Sayı: 1, 19–24. https://ajindex.com/articles/1454539

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Finishing/ polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004;29:275-9.
  2. Joniot SB, Gregoire GL, Auter AM, Roques YM. Three dimensional optical profilometry analysis of surface states obtained after finishing sequences for three composite resins.Oper Dent 2000;25: 311-315.
  3. Reis AF, Giannini M,Lovadino JR,Dias CTS.The effect of six polishing systems on the surface roughness of two packable resinbased composites.Am J Dent 2002;15: 193-197.
  4. Ryba TM, Dun NWJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable composites.Oper Dent 2003;27:243-247. composite surfaces after various finishing procedures.JADA 1975; 65 (12):29-33
  5. Strassler HE,Bauman G. Current concepts in polishing composite resins.Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993;5(3 supplement 1):12-7.
  6. Nagem-Filho H, D’Azevedo MTFS, Nagem HD, Marsola FP.Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing.Braz Dent J 2003;14:37-41.
  7. Laraba DC. Influence of a composite resin restoration on the gingiva.J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:402-4.
  8. Jefferies SR,Barkmeier WW,Gwinnet AJ.Three composite finishing systems:a multisite in vitro evaluation. J Esthet Dent.1992;4:30-32
  9. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry.Dent Clin North Am. 1998;42:613-627.
  10. Goldstein RE. Finishing of composites and laminates. Dent Clin North Am.1989;33:305-318
  11. Hondrum SO,Fernandez R.Contouring, finishing and polishing Class 5 restorative materials.Oper Dent.1997;5 30-36.
  12. Rooder LB, Powers JM. Surface roughness of resin composite prepared by single-use and multi-use diamonds.Am J Dent 2004;17:109-12.
  13. Turkun LS, Turkun M. The effect of one-step polishing system on the surface roughness of three esthetic resin composite materials. Oper Dent 2004;29:203-11.
  14. Lui JL & Low T:The surface finish of the new microfill restorative materials.A scanning electron microscope study. J Oral Rehab. 1982:9(1):67-82.
  15. Woolford MJ: Finishing glass polyalkenoate (glass- ionomer) cements.Br. Dent. J. 1988;165(11): 395-399.
  16. Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P.Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. 2007;19:265-275
  17. Kao EC. Influence of food-simulating solvents on resin composites and glass-ionomer restorative cement.Dent Mater 1989;5:201-8.
  18. Morgan M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations.Pract Proced Aesthet 2004;16:211-7
  19. Antoniada MH, Papadogianis Y, Kubia KE. Surface hardness of light cured and self cured composite resins.J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:215-20.
  20. Jaarda MJ, Wang RF, Lang BR. A regression analysis of filler particle content to predict composite wear. J Prosth Dent 1997;77:57-67.
  21. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M.Wear and surface roughness of current prosthetic composite after toothbrush dentifrice abrasion.J.Prost Dent 2000;84:93-97.
  22. Cecilia P.Trussi, Jose R.C. Saad, Sillas L.L. Duarte JR,Antonio L, Rodrigues JR.Composite surfaces after finishing and polishing tecniques. Am.J.Dent.2000;13(3):136-138.
  23. Yap AUJ, Lye KW; Rau CW.Surface characteristic of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Op. Dent. 1997;22:260-265.
  24. Chung K. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994;10:325-330.
  25. Bouvier D, Duprez JP,Lissac M.Comparative evaluation of polishing systems on the surface of three aesthetic materials.J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:888-894
  26. Barbosa SH,Zanata RL,Navarro MF, Nunes OB.Effect of different finishing and polishing tecniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins. Braz Dent J 2005;16(1):39-44
  27. G. Özgünaltay G,Yaz$c$ AR,Görücü J. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of new tooth-coloured restoratives. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2003 30;218-224
  28. Nagem Filho H, D’Azevedo MTFS, Nagem HD, Marsola FP.Surface roughness of composite resins after finishing and polishing. Braz Dent 2003;14(1):37-41
  29. Hoelscher DC,Neme AM, Pink FE,Hughes PJ. The effect of three finishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.Operative Dentistry 1998;23:36-42
  30. Roeder LB, Tate WH, Powers JM.Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.Oper Dent 2000;25:534-43.
  31. Tagtekin DA, Yan$koglu FC, Bozkurt FO, Kologlu B, Sur H.Selected characteristic of an Ormocer and a conventional hybrid resin composite.Dental Materials 2004;20:487-497.
  32. Jelen, B., Kunzelmann, K.-H., Mehl, A., Gloger, W., Hickel, R.: Sliding-wear of resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cements and compomers. J Dent Res 77 (5), 1231 (1998) Nr. 192. Yaz>5ma Adresi:
  33. Ar5. Gör.Dt. Nurcan ÖZAKAR )LDAY
  34. Atatürk Üniversitesi Di Hekimli;i Fakültesi
  35. Di Hastal$klar$ ve Tedavisi Ana Bilim Dal$ 25240- ERZURUM
  36. Strassler HE,Bauman G. Current concepts in polishing composite resins.Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1993;5(3 supplement 1):12-7.