SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Asya Öğretim Dergisi / 2023 / Volume: 11 Issue: 2

Reflections of COVID-19 on Teacher Education: A Metaphor Study for Distance Education

Bilge Peker(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0787-4996
Naci Küçükgençay(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4956-781X
Fadimana Karatepe(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5482-4863
Pages
—
Publication Date
2023-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is recommended to create solutions specific to the departments and prefer distance education methods suitable for the lessons.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, distance education replaced face-to-face education in the 2019-2020 academic year in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, 178 teacher candidates, including 79 secondary mathematics, 49 science, and 50 elementary teacher candidates studying in a public university in the Central Anatolia Region in the 2019-2020 academic year, were selected with the convenience sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is recommended to create solutions specific to the departments and prefer distance education methods suitable for the lessons.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2019-2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · distance education · synchronous lessons

Abstract

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, distance education replaced face-to-face education in the 2019-2020 academic year in Turkey. This basic qualitative study was conducted to show the metaphorical perceptions of teacher candidates about synchronous distance university education. In this study, 178 teacher candidates, including 79 secondary mathematics, 49 science, and 50 elementary teacher candidates studying in a public university in the Central Anatolia Region in the 2019-2020 academic year, were selected with the convenience sampling method. The data were collected online due to the pandemic with an online form which includes the phrase “Distance university education is like… because…”. The teacher candidates provided 173 well-structured metaphors about distance education. The content analysis method was used for data analysis. The findings obtained in this study showed that comfort, YouTube, home, incomplete, comfort, holiday, and emptiness metaphors were particularly used. Metaphors used by teacher candidates were collected under 17 different categories as "hardware", "satisfaction", "interaction", "future", "need", "complex", "comfort", "obligation", "motivation", "spiritual", "virtual", "systemic", "responsibility", “accessibility”, “suitability”, “efficiency” and “time”. The content analysis results revealed thatmetaphors differed according to the needs and nature of the departments. It is recommended to create solutions specific to the departments and prefer distance education methods suitable for the lessons.

🔖

Cite This Article

Peker, B., Küçükgençay, N., Karatepe, F. (2023). Reflections of COVID-19 on Teacher Education: A Metaphor Study for Distance Education. Asya Öğretim Dergisi, Volume: 11 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1246125

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (43)

  1. Akdemir, A. B., & Kılıç, A. (2020). Higher education students ‘views on distance education practices. The Journal of National Education, 49(1) [Special issue], 685-712. https://x.org/10.37669/milliegitim.783344
  2. Aksoğan, M. (2020). Opinions of students about distance education in the pandemi process. NATURENGS, Covid-19 Special Issue, 1-9.
  3. Aksoy, D. A., Bozkurt, A., & Kurşun, E. (2021). Higher education students' perceptions of distance education during the coronavirus (covid-19) pandemic. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 5(3), 285-308. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.900375
  4. Altheide, D. L., & Johnson, J. M. (2011). Reflections on interpretive adequacy in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 581-594). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  5. Altun-Ekiz, M. (2020). The views of physical education and sports school students about distance education in the quarantine period (A qualitative research). Journal of Sport and Recreation Researches, 2(1) [Special issue], 1-13.
  6. Altuntaş-Yılmaz, N. (2020). Investigation of students' attitudes towards applied distance education in the Covid-19 pandemic process in higher education institutions: Example of physiotherapy and rehabilitation department. Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 3 (1), 15-20.
  7. Anılan, B. (2017). Preservice science teachers metaphoric perceptions about chemistry concept. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 5(2), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148- 2624.1.5c2s1m
  8. Bozdağ, B., & Dinç, F. (2020). The perceptions of physical education teacher candidates towards the concept of distance education in the Covid-19 process: A metaphor study. International Journal of Eurasian Education and Culture, 5(11), 1954-1980. https://doi.org/10.35826/ijoecc.278
  9. Burke, K. (1989). On symbols and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Çivril, H., Aruğaslan, E., & Özaydın Özkara, B. (2018). Distance education perceptions of distance education students: A metaphor analysis. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(1), 39-59. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.310168
  12. Duman, S. N. (2020). Evaluation of the distance education process carried out during the epidemic period. The Journal of National Education, 49(1) [Special issue], 95-112. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.768887
  13. Erten, P. (2020). Metaphoric perceptions of preservice computer education and instructional technologies teachers on virtual classrooms. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 20(1), 33-148. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2020.20.52925-527431
  14. Fidan, M. (2017). Metaphors of blended learning students regarding the concept of distance education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(1), https://doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2017.01.017
  15. Hebebci, M. T., Bertiz, Y., & Alan, S. (2020). Investigation of views of students and teachers on distance education practices during the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(4), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.113
  16. Hirumi, A. (2002). The design and sequencing of e-learning interactions: A grounded approach. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(1), 19–2.
  17. Kaleli-Yılmaz, G., & Güven, B. (2015). Determining the teacher candidates’ perceptions on distance education by metaphors. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.16949/turcomat.75936
  18. Kan, A. Ü., & Özmen, E. (2021). Metaphoric perceptions of pre-service teacher on distance education during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of History School, 51, 1085-1118. https://doi.org/10.29228/joh.48942
  19. Karatepe, F., Küçükgençay, N., & Peker, B. (2020). What are the perspectives of teacher candidates on synchronous distance education? A survey study. Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research, 7(53), 1262-1274. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.1868
  20. Kırmacı, Ö., & Acar, S. (2018). The problems of campus students in simultaneous online distance education. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 14(3), 276-291. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.378138
  21. Kucukgencay, N., & Peker, B. (2023). The solo pantomime in the pandemic: Distance postgraduate education in the department of mathematics education during COVID-19. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 18(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/12716
  22. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  23. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. Nor, N. F. M., Hamat, A., & Embi, M. A. (2012). Patterns of discourse in online interaction: Seeking evidence of the collaborative learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 25(3), 237-256. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.655748
  25. Özer, S., & Turan, E. Z. (2021). Opinions of prospective teachers about distance education due to Covid-19. Turkish Studies-Education, 16(2), 1049-1068. https://doi.org/10.47423/TurkishStudies.48147
  26. Öztürk, H., Kırcı, A., & Turan, L. (2021). What is distance education like during Covid-19 pandemic? Perceptions of teacher candidates. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 5(2), 85-110.
  27. Özyürek, A., Begde, Z., Yavuz, N., & Özkan, İ. (2016). Evaluation of distance education applications from students’ perspective. Karabük University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 6(2), 592-605.
  28. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  29. Saban, A. (2004). Entry level prospective classroom teachers’ metaphors about the concept of “teacher”. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2(2), 131-155.
  30. Saban, A. (2008). Primary school teachers’ and their students’ mental images about the concept of knowledge. Elementary Education Online, 7(2), 421-455.
  31. Saban, A. (2009). Prospective teachers’ mental images about the concept of student. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 7(2), 281-326.
  32. Taş, H., Yavuzalp, N., & Gürer, M. (2016, October). BÖTE bölümü öğrencilerinin uzaktan eğitime yönelik algılarının metaforlar yoluyla belirlenmesi [Determining the perceptions of CEIT department students towards distance education through metaphors]. The 4th International Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education Symposium, Elazığ, Türkiye.
  33. Tuncay, N., Stanescu, I. A., & Tuncay, M. (2011). A different vision in eLearning: Metaphors. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning (EJEL), 9(1), 105-114.
  34. Tuncer, M., & Bahadır, F. (2017). Evaluation of the distance education programs according to student views that learned in these programs. Journal of Educational Reflections, 1(2), 29-38.
  35. Turgut, Y. E., & Yıldırım, M. (2022). Determining the perceptions of pre-service teachers toward distance Education through metaphors. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 35(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1032658
  36. Usta, İ. (2019). Distance learners metaphorical images to open education. Journal of Strategic Research in Social Science, 5(1), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.26579/josress-5.1.7
  37. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences] (11th ed.). Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
  38. Yıldız, E. (2020). Investigation of factors affecting the sense of community of distance education learners in online learning environments. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 8(1), 180-205. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.8c.1s.9m
  39. Yolcu, H. H. (2020). Preservice elementary teachers’ distance education experiences at the time of coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 237-250.
  40. YÖK (2020, March). Basın açıklaması [Press briefing]. Retrieved from https://www.yok.gov.tr/Sayfalar/Haberler/2020/universitelerde-uygulanacak-uzaktan-egitime-iliskin-aciklama.aspx
  41. Aksoğan, M. (2020). Opinions of students about distance education in the pandemi process. NATURENGS, Covid-19 Special Issue, 1-9.
  42. Altuntaş-Yılmaz, N. (2020). Investigation of students' attitudes towards applied distance education in the Covid-19 pandemic process in higher education institutions: Example of physiotherapy and rehabilitation department. Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal, 3 (1), 15-20.
  43. Turgut, Y. E., & Yıldırım, M. (2022). Determining the perceptions of pre-service teachers toward distance Education through metaphors. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 35(1), 68-90. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1032658