SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Asya Öğretim Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Determination of Instructors' Opinions on the Effectiveness of Community Service Practices Course

Nazmiye Feyza Akyol Bozkurt(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0002-4530-297X
Seraceddin Levent Zorluoğlu(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8958-0579
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings indicate that lecturers strive to enhance students' individual and social awareness through these projects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the diversity of projects undertaken by gathering the perspectives of lecturers involved in a Community Service Practices (CSP) course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Further guidance, planning strategies, and communication mechanisms should be developed to address these challenges.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings indicate that lecturers strive to enhance students' individual and social awareness through these projects.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Community service practices · lecturer · student

Abstract

This study aims to determine the diversity of projects undertaken by gathering the perspectives of lecturers involved in a Community Service Practices (CSP) course. It examines the advantages and disadvantages of group versus individual work, the organizational structure and duration of projects, and the impact of community service awareness on lecturers. Utilizing a case study design within a qualitative research framework, this study employed criterion sampling, a purposeful sampling method, to identify the study group. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with eight lecturers who had taught CSP courses. The collected data were subjected to content and descriptive analysis. These findings indicate that lecturers strive to enhance students' individual and social awareness through these projects. Within the course framework, lecturers guide students in achieving equal opportunities, social responsibility, and professional competence. Project studies are conducted using individual, group, and mixed methods. Individual studies promote time management and independent learning skills, whereas group studies enhance cooperation and problem solving skills. Lecturers face challenges, such as procedural restrictions, time management issues, lack of motivation, environmental factors, and inexperience during the course. Further guidance, planning strategies, and communication mechanisms should be developed to address these challenges. The CSP course has contributed to an increase in social responsibility awareness, volunteerism, social interaction, and academic skills. Lecturers anticipate that candidate teachers will develop into sensitive, conscious, and responsible individuals in both academic and social contexts.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bozkurt, N. F. A., Zorluoğlu, S. L. (2025). Determination of Instructors' Opinions on the Effectiveness of Community Service Practices Course. Asya Öğretim Dergisi, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.47215/aji.1681527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (63)

  1. Akcanca, N., & Girgin, D. (2020). The predictive power of student teachers’ perceptions of community service activities in terms of predicting their service-learning levels. Journal of the Human and Social Science Researches, 9(3), 2201-2224. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.755333
  2. Akın, S. (2021). Community service: Connecting active citizenship and preservice teacher education. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 53, 21-59. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.764545
  3. Altun, C., & Polat, S. (2020). The ability to use thinking design skills in social service practices of social studies prospective teachers. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 81, 429-448.
  4. Aykırı, K. (2017). Determination of the experiences of social studies teacher candidates on the projects of community service practices. International Journal of New Approaches in Social Studies, 1(1), 42-55.
  5. Ayvacı, H. Ş., & Akyıldız, S. (2009). The benefits of the community service practices course to the individual and the society and the expectations of the society. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 184, 102-119.
  6. Banerjee, M., & Hausafus, C. O. (2007). Faculty use of service-learning: Perceptions, motivations, and impediments for the human sciences. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 14(1), 32-45.
  7. Bartoll, C., O., Capella Peris, C., & Pallares Piquer, M. (2018). Actionresearch on a service-learning program in teaching physical education. RieRevista De Investigacion Educativa, 36(1), 277-293. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.36.1.270581
  8. Battistoni, R. M. (1997). Service learning and democratic citizenship. Theory into Practice, 36(3), 150-156.
  9. Beldağ, A., Yaylacı, A. F., Gök, E., & İpek, C. (2015). Evaluation of community service practices course in terms of university-society cooperation. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16(2), 161-178.
  10. Birdwell, J., Scott, R., & Horley, E. (2013). Active citizenship, education and service learning. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197913483683
  11. Boran, M., & Karakuş, F. (2017). An investigation of teacher candidates' perceptions on community service practices (CSP) course. Erciyes Journal of Education, 1(1), 22-41.
  12. Creswell, J. (2017). Research design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. (Trans. S. B. Demir & M. Bütün) (3rd ed). Eğiten Kitap.
  13. Çetinkaya, M. (2018). The effect of the events aiming at community service applications to the social skills and self-efficacy of teacher candidates. ODU Journal of Social Science, 8(3), 623-635.
  14. Çoban, B., Kaşkaya, A., & Ağırbaş, Ö. (2010). Implementing the community services course: practice examples and evaluation of students’ perceptions. 9. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Eğitimi Sempozyumu, Elazığ.
  15. Dere, İ., & Akdeniz, Ş. N. (2021). Active citizenship and volunteerism perceptions of social studies teacher candidates serving society. Başkent University Journal of Education, 8(2), 352-367.
  16. Dewey, J. (1996). Democracy and education, introduction to philosophy of education (Trans, T. Yılmaz). Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları Basımevi.
  17. Donahue, D. M., Bowyer, J., & Rosenberg, D. (2003). Learning with and learning from: Reciprocity in service learning in teacher education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 36(1), 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665680303498
  18. Durán, R. (2024). El voluntariado, instrumento de la universidad para la transformación social. Retrieved from https://cincodias.elpais.com/companias/2024-11-05/el-voluntariado-instrumento-de-la-universidad-para-la-transformacion-social.html
  19. Einfeld, A., & Collins, D. (2008). The relationships between service-learning, social justice, multicultural competence, and civic engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 49(2), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2008.0017
  20. Ekşi, Z., & Cinoğlu, M. (2012). An evaluation of the community service applications course. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(2), 3-22.
  21. Gazi University Community Service Practices Directive (2010). Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları [Community Service Practices]. Retrieved from https://gef.gazi.edu.tr/view/page/4872/topluma-hizmet-uygulamalari
  22. Gökçe, N. (2011). Social studies teacher candidates’ opinions about the practice of community service. International Journal of Human Sciences, 8(2), 176-194.
  23. Gökkaya, N., Güney, S., Bozkurt, A., Karabudak, Ö., Demir, E., & Yozgatlıoğlu, Y. (2023). Equal opportunity in education: An evaluation of teachers' views. International Academic Social Resources Journal, 8(55), 4151-4158. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/ASRJOU RNAL.73078
  24. Gündüz, T., & Zorluoğlu, S. L. (2021). Determining the awareness for IEP of pre-service science teachers. Eurasian Journal of Teacher Education, 2(2), 84-100.
  25. Hasbún, B., Miño, C., Cárdenas, C., Cisternas, O., Fara, C., & Garcia, F. (2016). Service-learning as a means to promote development of social responsibility competency in a department of economics and business. International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 4(1), 167-179. https://doi.org/10.9779/pauefd.764545
  26. Hürsoy, P. Ş., & Yemişci, D. A. (2022). Perspectives of teacher candidates’ on community service practices course. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(236), 3515-3536. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.949383
  27. İlhan, E., Çam, Ş. S., & Çam, Z. (2018). Student engagement in academic, social and cultural activities at higher education. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(2), 213-234.
  28. Jones, S. R. (1998). Service-learning: Applications from the research. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 585–588. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1998.11775154
  29. Karaman, M., Artan, T., & Cebeci, F. (2020). The effect of group work on the personal development skills of the social work department students. Turkish Studies-Social Sciences, 15(6), 3013-3026. https://doi.org/10.47356/TurkishStudies.43519
  30. Kesten, A., Köçer, M., & Egüz, Ş. (2014). Community service learning course and its effects on gaining social consciousness. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 27(2), 393-410. https://doi.org/10.19171/uuefd.19923
  31. Kocadere, S. A., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2013). Implementing the community services course: practice examples and evaluation of students’ perceptions. Pamukkale University Journal of Education, 34(34), 75-89. https://doi.org/10.9779/PUJE504
  32. Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 387-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
  33. Leary, M. P., & Sherlock, L. A. (2020). Service‐learning or ınternship: a mixed‐methods evaluation of experiential learning pedagogies. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1683270
  34. Marcus, V. B., Atan, N. A., Yusof, S. M., & Tahir, L. (2020). A systematic review of e-service learning in higher education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(6), 4-14. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i06.13395
  35. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (1973, 14 Haziran). Resmî Gazete. Kanun No: 1739, Sayı 14574. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.1739.pdf
  36. Mendel-Reyes, M. (1998). A pedagogy for citizenship: Service learning and democratic education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 73, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.7304
  37. Moely, B. E., & Ilustre, V. (2014). The impact of service-learning course characteristics on university students' learning outcomes. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 21(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382591103400205
  38. Murphy, T. (2010). Conversations on engaged pedagogies, independent thinking skills and active citizenship. Issues in Educational Research, 20(1), 39-46.
  39. Narong, D. K., & Hallinger, P. (2023). A keyword co-occurrence analysis of research on service learning: Conceptual foci and emerging research trends. Education Sciences, 13(4), 339. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040339
  40. Noyan, M., & Kesten, A. (2020). A review on community service learning studies in Turkey. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 50, 207-227.
  41. O’Meara, K., & Niehaus, E. (2009). Service-learning is… How faculty explain their practice. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 16(1), 17-32.
  42. Ocak, G. (2019). Eğitimde bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri [Scientific research methods in education]. Pegem Akademi.
  43. Özdemir, S. M., & Tokcan, H (2010). Evaluation of community service course according to pre-service teachers’ views. Journal of Ahmet Kelesoglu Education Faculty, 30, 41-61.
  44. Öztuna Kaplan, A., & Diker Coşkun, Y. (2012). An action research on difficulties and solutions in project-based teaching practices. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 137-159. https://doi.org/10.17860/efd.40109 Patton, M. Q. (2018). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed). (Trans., M. Bütün & S. B. Demir). Pegem Akademi.
  45. Santiago-Ortiz, A. (2019). From critical to decolonizing service-learning: Limits and possibilities of social justice-based approaches to community service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 25(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0025.104
  46. Saputro, A. D., Atun, S., Wilujeng, I., Ariyanto, A., & Arifin, S. (2020). Enhancing pre-service elementary teachers’ self-efficacy and critical thinking using problem-based learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(5), 765-773. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.765
  47. Saran, M., Coşkun, G., İnalzorel, F., & Aksoy, Z. (2011). Improving the consciousness of social responsibility at universities: A research on lesson of social service practice at Ege University. Journal of Yaşar University, 6(22), 3732-3747. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyu.06006
  48. Sarikas, C., (2016). Definition: What Is Community Service? Retrieved from https://blog.prepscholar.com/what-is-community-service
  49. Seban, D. (2014). Faculty perspectives of community service learning in teacher education. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 42(2), 18-35. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.54290
  50. Smith, J., & Taylor, K. (2022). Independent learning practices and time management in education. Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 120-135.
  51. Sönmez, Ö. F. (2010). The evaluation of the ideas in the aspect of acaustion of social studies preservice terachers on the lecture of practice of the service to the public. Karadeniz Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 2, 53-72.
  52. Şeker, P. T., & Savaş, Ö. (2023). Examination of teachers' views on out-of-school learning environments. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 7(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1118257
  53. Uğurlu, Z., & Kıral, E. (2013). The process of teacher candidates service-learning and the views relating with the attainments. Journal of Humanities and Tourism Research, 3(1), 59-93.
  54. Ulusoy, K., & Topcubaşı, T. (2019). Service learning approach in values education: A sample application in life science course. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(3), 1509-1544. https://doi.org/10.29299/kefad.2019.20.03.015
  55. Uzun, B., & İris, H. (2019). Implementing the community services course: practice examples and evaluation of students’ and ınstructor’ perceptions: Sakarya university health vocational school case. Journal of Institute of Economic Development and Social Researches, 5(18), 206-219.
  56. Ültay, E., Akyurt, H., & Ültay, N. (2021). Descriptive content analysis in social sciences. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 188-201. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.871703
  57. Wade, R. C. (1995). Developing active citizens: Community service learning in social studies teacher education. The Social Studies, 86(3), 122-128.
  58. Yanık, F. (2019). Determining the social responsibility levels of teacher candidates taking the community service practices course and evaluating their views on the course (Unpublished master's thesis). Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
  59. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  60. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences] (10rd ed). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  61. Yılmaz, K. (2011). Social responsibility of education faculties and the lessons of community service practices: A qualitative study. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 4(2), 86-108.
  62. Yüksek Öğretim Kurumu (YÖK). (2011). Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları (THU) yönergesi [Community Service Practices (CSP) directive], Sayı: 1217. Retrieved from https://www.siirt.edu.tr/dosya/personel/topluma-hizmet-uygulamalari-siirt-202310131427715.pdf
  63. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı (YÖK). (2007). Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Fakülteleri: Öğretmenin Üniversitede Yetiştirilmesinin Değerlendirilmesi [Teacher Training and Education Faculties: Evaluation of Teacher Training in Universities]. Retrieved from https://www.yok.edu.tr/Documents/Yayinlar/Yayinlarimiz/ogretmen-yetistirme-ve-egitim-fakulteleri.pdf