Journals / Amme İdaresi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Aggression Level of the Employees Subjected to Mobbing: The Differences Related to Individual and Working Life

Yıldırmaya Maruz Kalan Çalışanların Agresif Tepkileri: Bireysel ve Çalışma Hayatına İlişkin Farklılıklar

Pages
117–177
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of the analysis on the data obtained from the survey instrument, it was found that nearly 88 % of employees could resort to four types of aggressive responses described as insidious, offended, explicit, and imputed to organization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study attempts to explore mobbing victims' aggressive responses and to determine how these aggressive responses differentiate based on individual and working life differences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A survey instrument related to aggressive responses to the mobbing and demographics was administered on 291 public and private sector employees, who reported to be subjected to mobbing.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of the analysis on the data obtained from the survey instrument, it was found that nearly 88 % of employees could resort to four types of aggressive responses described as insidious, offended, explicit, and imputed to organization.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study attempts to explore mobbing victims' aggressive responses and to determine how these aggressive responses differentiate based on individual and working life differences. A survey instrument related to aggressive responses to the mobbing and demographics was administered on 291 public and private sector employees, who reported to be subjected to mobbing. As a result of the analysis on the data obtained from the survey instrument, it was found that nearly 88 % of employees could resort to four types of aggressive responses described as insidious, offended, explicit, and imputed to organization. It was concluded that employees exhibit offended responses when subjected to mobbing against possibilities to maintain their personal reputation, exhibit explicit responses when subjected to mobbing against physical health, exhibit the responses imputed to organization when subjected to mobbing against possibilities to maintain their social contacts and exhibit insidious responses when subjected to any of these mobbing types excluding mobbing against possibilities to maintain their personal reputation.

Özet

Bu araştırma yıldırmaya maruz kalan çalışanların sergilediği agresif tepkilerin ortaya çıkarılabilmesini ve bu tepkilerin bireysel ve çalışma hayatına ilişkin özellikler açısından ne ölçüde farklılaştığının tespit edilebilmesini amaçlamaktadır. Yıldırmaya uğradığını beyan eden 291 kamu ve özel sektör işgörenine yıldırmaya karşı sergilenen agresif tepkiler ile demografik özelliklere ilişkin bir anket uygulanmıştır. Anketten elde edilen verilerin analizi neticesinde işgörenlerin yaklaşık %88'inin sinsi, küskün, belirgin ve örgüte yöneltilen şeklinde ifade edilen dört çeşit agresif tepkiye başvurabildiği belirlenmiştir. İşgörenlerin itibarına yönelik yıldırmaya maruz kaldığında küskün tepkiler, bedensel sağlığına yönelik yıldırmaya uğradığında belirgin tepkiler, sosyal ilişkilerini sürdürme imkânına yönelik yıldırma gerçekleştirildiğinde örgüte yöneltilen tepkiler ve itibarına yönelik saldırılar haricindeki yıldırma türlerinden herhangi birisine maruz kaldığında ise sinsi tepkiler sergilediği tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

NAKTİYOK, A., YANIK, O., TİMUROĞLU, M. K. (2017). Aggression Level of the Employees Subjected to Mobbing: The Differences Related to Individual and Working Life. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 117–177. https://ajindex.com/articles/145022

References (5)

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991), "The Theory of Planned Behavior", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50, No: (2), s. 179--21 1. Andersson, L. M. (1996), "Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using Contract Violation Framework", Human Relations, Vol. 49 (11), s. 1395--1418. Antoncic, B. ve Hisrich, R. D. (2001), "Intrapreneurship: Construct Refinement and Cross--cultural Validation", Journal ofBusiness Venturing, Vol. 16 (5), s. 495--527. Avcı, U. ve Kaya, U. (20.13), "Yıldırma Algısı ve Etkileri: Hizmet Sektöründe Bir Araştırma", Ankara Universitesi SBF Dergisi, Cilt. 68 Sayı. (2), 5. 1--25. Aydın. Ş. ve Özkul. E. (2007), "İşyerinde Yaşanan Psikolojik Şiddetin Yapısı ve Boyutları: 4-- Yıldızlı Otel İşletmeleri Orneği", Anadolu Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt. Sayı. (2), s.169--186. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981), "Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Comment", Journal ofMarketing Research, Vol. 18, No: (3), s. 375-381.
  2. Balkaya, F. ve Şahin, N. H. (2003), "Çok Koyutlu Öfke Ölçeği", Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, Cilt 14, Sayı. (3), s. 192--202. Baltaş, A. (2003), "Adı Yeni Konmus Bir Olgu: İşyerinde Yıldırma (Mobbing)", http://www.baltasgıubu.com/Makaleler/adi--yeni--konmus--bir--olgu----isyerinde-- yildirma--mobbinghtml (25.04.2016).
  3. Baron, R. A. ve Neuman, J. H. (1996), "Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence on Their Relative Frequency and Potential Causes", Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 22 No: (3), s. 161--173. Baron, R. A. ve Neuman, J. H. (1998), "Workplace Aggression----The Iceberg Beneath The Tip of Workplace Violence: Evidence on Its Forms, Frequency, and Targets", Public Administration Quarterly, Vol. 21, No: (4), s. 446--464. Baron, R. A., Neuman, J. H. ve Geddes, D. (1999), "Social and Personal Determinants of Workplace Aggression: Evidence for the Impact of Perceived Injustice and the Type Behavior Pattern", Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 25, No: (4), s. 281--296. Bayrak Kök, S. (2006), "İş yaşamında Psiko--Şiddet Sarmalı Olarak Yıldırma Olgusu ve Nedenleri"; Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt 16, s. 433-- 448. Bergeron, N. ve Schneider, B. H. (2005), "Explaining Cross 'hational Differences in Peer'directed Aggression: Quantitative Synthesis", Aggressive behavior, Vol. 31 No: (2), s. 116-137.
  4. Besag, V. E. (1995), Bullies and Victims in Schools: Guide to Understanding and Management, Open University Press,
  5. Philadelphia. Björkqvist, K., Österman, K. ve Hjelt--Ba