SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 1

Evolution and Thematic Trends in Educational Virtual Reality Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature from 1994 to 2025

Nail Değirmenci(GAZI UNIVERSITY, GAZİ FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0001-7537-7345
Yusuf İnel(USAK UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-0739-5730
Turhan Çetin(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GAZİ EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7398-8190
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, as educational VR research becomes increasingly multidisciplinary, there is an urgent need to incentivize studies in other disciplines, such as the social sciences, conduct longitudinal research, and implement strategic policies that foster international partnerships.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the intellectual, social, and conceptual structure of the academic literature on virtual reality (VR) in education between 1994 and 2025 using bibliometric analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An analysis of 13,913 articles from Web of Science, Scopus, Lens, and PubMed using RStudio's Bibliometrix package reveals that academic interest is increasing rapidly, with a 9.85% annual growth rate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, as educational VR research becomes increasingly multidisciplinary, there is an urgent need to incentivize studies in other disciplines, such as the social sciences, conduct longitudinal research, and implement strategic policies that foster international partnerships.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2025 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Virtual reality · Bibliometric analysis · Educational technology

Abstract

This study aims to examine the intellectual, social, and conceptual structure of the academic literature on virtual reality (VR) in education between 1994 and 2025 using bibliometric analysis. An analysis of 13,913 articles from Web of Science, Scopus, Lens, and PubMed using RStudio's Bibliometrix package reveals that academic interest is increasing rapidly, with a 9.85% annual growth rate. This momentum is largely driven by Generation Z's affinity for technology and the pandemic-accelerated digital transformation. Thematically, the research focus has shifted from fundamental pedagogical advantages, such as concretizing abstract concepts, to advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence and the metaverse, as well as human-centered approaches that emphasize user experience. Productivity analyses confirm that the United States and China are global leaders in publication volume and citation impact. In global networks, institutions like Boston University and the University of Toronto stand out, highlighting a concentration of research around medicine and health education. However, despite a vast academic community of 38,951 authors, the international co-authorship rate is only 1.032%, showing highly limited global collaboration. In conclusion, as educational VR research becomes increasingly multidisciplinary, there is an urgent need to incentivize studies in other disciplines, such as the social sciences, conduct longitudinal research, and implement strategic policies that foster international partnerships.

🔖

Cite This Article

Değirmenci, N., İnel, Y., Çetin, T. (2026). Evolution and Thematic Trends in Educational Virtual Reality Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of Literature from 1994 to 2025. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 10 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1893312

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Akgün, M., & Atıcı, B. (2022). The effects of immersive virtual reality environments on students' academic achievement: a meta-analytical and meta-thematic study. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.57.9.3
  2. Alazmi, H. S., & Alemtairy, G. M. (2024). The effects of immersive virtual reality field trips upon student academic achievement, cognitive load, and multimodal presence in a social studies educational context. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 22189–22211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12682-3
  3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  4. Bermejo, B., Juiz, C., Cortes, D., Oskam, J., Moilanen, T., Loijas, J., Govender, P., Hussey, J., Schmidt, A. L., Burbach, R., King, D., O'Connor, C., & Dunlea, D. (2023). AR/VR teaching-learning experiences in higher education ınstitutions (HEI): A systematic literature review. Informatics, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10020045
  5. Bolo-Romero, K. M., Guevara-Granados, V. I., Peceros-Peceros, K., Suyo-Vega, J. A., & Alvarado-Suyo, S. A. (2023). Virtual environments in higher education: A systematic review. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 12(4), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2023-0107
  6. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6, 87-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00143964
  7. Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2010). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x
  8. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179,
  9. Dewi, P. K., & Mastoah, I. (2025). Utilization of technology in education with character in the era of generation Z. Journal of Islamic Education, 11(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.37286/ojs.v11i1.263
  10. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  11. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., Janssen, M.,. Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542
  12. Firdaus, T., Wardani, E., Pratiwi, S. E., Kurniasih, S., Hidayah, N., & Putra, M. F. O. (2025). Research trend virtual reality in education: Bibliometric analysis. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Education, 9(1), 28–46. 4484081. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/4484081
  13. Gurin, P., Dey, E., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72 (3), 330–367. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.72.3.01151786u134n051
  14. Kuleto, V., Ilić, M., Dumangiu, M., Ranković, M., Martins, O. M. D., Păun, D., & Mihoreanu, L. (2021). Exploring opportunities and challenges of artificial ıntelligence and machine learning in higher education institutions. Sustainability, 13(18), 10424. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810424
  15. Mallek F, Mazhar T, Faisal Abbas Shah S, Ghadi YY, & Hamam H. (2024). A review on cultivating effective learning: synthesizing educational theories and virtual reality for enhanced educational experiences. PeerJ Computer Science 10, 1-41. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.2000
  16. Maples-Keller, J. L., Bunnell, B. E., Kim, S.-J., & Rothbaum, B. O. (2017). The use of virtual reality technology in the treatment of anxiety and other psychiatric disorders. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 25(3), 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/HRP.0000000000000138
  17. Marougkas, A., Troussas, C., Krouska, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Virtual Reality in Education: A Review of Learning Theories, Approaches and Methodologies for the Last Decade. Electronics, 12(13), 2832. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12132832
  18. McGaghie, W. C., Issenberg, S. B., Cohen, E. R., Barsuk, J. H., & Wayne, D. B. (2011). Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Academic Medicine, 86(6), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119
  19. Merchant, Z., Goetz, E. T., Cifuentes, L., Keeney-Kennicutt, W., & Davis, T. J. (2014). Effectiveness of virtual reality-based instruction on students' learning outcomes in K-12 and higher education: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 70, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.07.033
  20. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Open Medicine, 3(2), 123–130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005
  21. Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785–797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241
  22. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
  23. Rojas-Sánchez, M. A., Palos-Sánchez, P. R., & Folgado-Fernández, J. A. (2023). Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 155–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11167-5
  24. Steinbauer, R. (2024). Teaching students about workplace harassment by letting them experience it in a virtual reality environment. Journal of Management Education, 48(4), 671–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629231225735
  25. Taranilla, R.V., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., González-Calero, J.A., & Cirugeda, I.L. (2019). Strolling through a city of the Roman Empire: an analysis of the potential of virtual reality to teach history in Primary Education. Interactive Learning Environments, 30, 608-618. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674886
  26. Uyanik, G. (2025). The use of technology in primary school science education from 1974 to 2025: A bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Education, 60(3), e70156. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70156
  27. Wu, H.-K., Lee, S. W.-Y., Chang, H.-Y., & Liang, J.-C. (2012). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024
  28. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin V. I., Melissa, B., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-where are the educators. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(39), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  29. De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068002179,
  30. Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Baabdullah, A. M., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Giannakis, M., Al-Debei, M. M., Dennehy, D., Metri, B., Buhalis, D., Cheung, C. M. K., Conboy, K., Doyle, R., Dubey, R., Dutot, V., Felix, R., Goyal, D. P., Gustafsson, A., Hinsch, C., Jebabli, I., Janssen, M.,. Wamba, S. F. (2022). Metaverse beyond the hype: Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 66, 102542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102542