SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

Parents' experiences and support needs regarding sexuality education for children with special needs: A qualitative descriptive study

Metehan Acar(Bursa İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü)0000-0001-5372-9645
Özge Ünlü(İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-2569-2851
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-12
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that many parents consider sexual education essential, primarily associating this necessity with the need for “protection from abuse and safety.” It was determined that 80% of the parents had not received any prior training on this subject, yet almost all expressed a critical need for expert support and comprehensive education.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the experiences, perceptions, and support needs of parents regarding sexual education for children with special needs.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study group consists of 25 parents residing in Bursa, Türkiye, who have children with various special needs (e.g., Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability, Down Syndrome).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that many parents consider sexual education essential, primarily associating this necessity with the need for “protection from abuse and safety.” It was determined that 80% of the parents had not received any prior training on this subject, yet almost all expressed a critical need for expert support and comprehensive education.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sexual education · Special needs · Parental opinions

Abstract

This study aims to examine the experiences, perceptions, and support needs of parents regarding sexual education for children with special needs. The research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive design. The study group consists of 25 parents residing in Bursa, Türkiye, who have children with various special needs (e.g., Autism Spectrum Disorder, Intellectual Disability, Down Syndrome). Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that many parents consider sexual education essential, primarily associating this necessity with the need for “protection from abuse and safety.” It was determined that 80% of the parents had not received any prior training on this subject, yet almost all expressed a critical need for expert support and comprehensive education. Parents reported struggling to approach the topic due to limited knowledge and societal taboos. In conclusion, while parents recognize sexual education as a vital need, they experience significant challenges in practice. Accordingly, it is recommended to develop individualized education programs through strong collaboration among families, educators, and experts to empower parents and ensure the safety of individuals with special needs.

🔖

Cite This Article

Acar, M., Ünlü, Ö. (2026). Parents' experiences and support needs regarding sexuality education for children with special needs: A qualitative descriptive study. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1941084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Alp, Z. A., Sezik, A., & Aksoy, F. (2025). Özel gereksinimli bireylere yönelik cinsel eğitim konulu lisansüstü tezlerin sistematik derlemesi [A systematic review of postgraduate theses on sexual education for individuals with special needs]. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38(1), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1540602
  2. Boyacıoğlu, N. E., Karaçam, Z. D., & Keser Özcan, N. (2019). Sexuality despite obstacles: Sexual behavior of individuals with mental disability. Archives of Health Science and Research, 5(2), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.17681/hsp.291360
  3. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications.
  4. Bülbül, İ., & Karataş, K. (2023). Zihinsel yetersizliği olan bireylerin cinsel yaşamları: Ebeveynlerin bakış açısından bir değerlendirme [Sexual lives of individuals with mental disability: A consideration from parents’ perspectives]. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (58), 2577–2614. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1291527
  5. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  6. East, L. J., & Orchard, T. R. (2014). Somebody else’s job: Experiences of sex education among health professionals, parents and adolescents with physical disabilities in Southwestern Ontario. Sexuality and Disability, 32(3), 335–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-013-9289-5
  7. Evans, D. S., McGuire, B. E., Healy, E., & Carley, S. N. (2009). Sexuality and personal relationships for people with an intellectual disability. Part II: Staff and family carer perspectives. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(11), 913–921. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01202.x
  8. Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  9. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Prentice-Hall.
  10. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15671-8
  11. Levitt, H. M. (2019). Reporting qualitative research in psychology: How to meet APA style journal article reporting standards. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000121-000
  12. Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151
  13. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
  14. Lune, H., & Berg, B. L. (2017). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (9th ed.). Pearson.
  15. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  16. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB]. (2018). Zihinsel engelli bireyler için cinsellik eğitimi modeli geliştirilmesi projesi (DESEM) [Developing a sexual education model for individuals with intellectual disabilities project]. Özel Eğitim ve Rehberlik Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. https://orgm.meb.gov.tr/www/zihinsel-engelli-bireyler-icin-cinsellik-egitimi-modeli-gelistirilmesi-projesi-developing-sexual-education-model-for-mentally-disabled-people-desem/icerik/1137
  17. Milligan, M. S., & Neufeldt, A. H. (2001). The myth of asexuality: A survey of social and empirical evidence. Sexuality and Disability, 19(2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010621705591
  18. Öncü, E., Aktaş, G., Vayısoğlu, S. K., & Karakuş, E. (2019). Zihinsel engelli ergenlerin cinsel gelişim özellikleri ve ailelerin yaşadığı güçlükler: Tanımlayıcı çalışma [Sexual development in adolescents with intellectual disabilities and difficulties experienced by the parents: A descriptive study]. Mersin Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.26559/mersinsbd.553739
  19. Rushbrooke, E., Murray, C. D., & Townsend, S. (2014). What difficulties are experienced by caregivers in relation to the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.012
  20. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4 3.0.CO;2-G
  21. Swango-Wilson, A. (2008). Caregiver perception of sexual behaviors of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 26(2), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-008-9071-2
  22. Tracy, S. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
  23. Travers, J., & Tincani, M. (2010). Sexuality education for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: Critical issues and decision-making guidelines. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45(2), 284–293.
  24. Wolfe, P. S. (1997). The influence of personal values on issues of sexuality and disability. Sexuality and Disability, 15(2), 69–90. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024731917753
  25. Wolfensberger, W. (1972). The principle of normalization in human services. National Institute on Mental Retardation.
  26. World Health Organization [WHO]. (2006). Defining sexual health: Report of a technical consultation on sexual health. World Health Organization.
  27. Yıldız, G., & Cavkaytar, A. (2017). Effectiveness of a sexual education program for mothers of children with intellectual disabilities. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 52(1), 32–46.
  28. Yükseköğretim Kurulu [YÖK]. (2018). Özel eğitim öğretmenliği lisans programı [Special education teaching undergraduate programme]. Yükseköğretim Kurulu Başkanlığı. https://egitim.yok.gov.tr/tr/document/2446