Journals / BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2

Liquidity analysis of government securities in the secondary market and recommendations for its improvement

Devlet iç borçlanma senetlerinin ikincil piyasa likidite analizi ve likiditesini artırıcı önlemler

Pages
113–146
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In order to include the effects of global financial crises to the analysis, which was occured in the second half of 2008, analysis period was chosen as December 2007 to December 2010 In this study, ARMA econometric method was used with daily data Empirical findings reveal that there exist a positive and smgnificant relationship between liquidity of benchmark government securiy in secondary market and trading volume of this security Results also confirmed that the higher the volatility of the benchmark security the lesser the liquidity of the government securities in the secondary market.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to analyze the effects of volatility and trading volume on secondary market liquidity of government securities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Moreover, 5 and 10 year fixed coupon benchmarks were also analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In order to include the effects of global financial crises to the analysis, which was occured in the second half of 2008, analysis period was chosen as December 2007 to December 2010 In this study, ARMA econometric method was used with daily data Empirical findings reveal that there exist a positive and smgnificant relationship between liquidity of benchmark government securiy in secondary market and trading volume of this security Results also confirmed that the higher the volatility of the benchmark security the lesser the liquidity of the government securities in the secondary market.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effects of volatility and trading volume on secondary market liquidity of government securities. Liquidity of government securities was measured by using the end-day bid and ask prices in the ISE. Zero coupon benchmark government security was chosen for this analysis since it has the most trading volume in the government bond market. Moreover, 5 and 10 year fixed coupon benchmarks were also analyzed. In order to include the effects of global financial crises to the analysis, which was occured in the second half of 2008, analysis period was chosen as December 2007 to December 2010 In this study, ARMA econometric method was used with daily data Empirical findings reveal that there exist a positive and smgnificant relationship between liquidity of benchmark government securiy in secondary market and trading volume of this security Results also confirmed that the higher the volatility of the benchmark security the lesser the liquidity of the government securities in the secondary market. As a result, volatiliy and trading volume of government benchmark securities play a critical role on government benchmark security's liquidity in the secondary market.

Özet

Bu çalışma, DİBS'lerin oynaklık ve işlem hacimlerinin ikincil piyasadaki likiditelerine etkilerini test etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. DİBS'lerin ikincil piyasadaki likiditeleri, İM KB Tahvil ve Bono Piyasasında kota edilen gun sonu talep ve teklif fiyatları arasındaki açıklık (TTFA) ile ölçülmüştür. Çalışmada test edilmek üzere piyasada en çok işlem gören ve 2 yıl vadeli gösterge senet ile 5 yıl ve 10 yıl vadeli sabit kuponlu senetler kullanılmıştır. 2008 yılının ikinci yarısında yaşanan global finansal krizin de etkisini analize dahil etmek amacıyla 2007 Aralık- 2010 Aralık dönemi verileri kullanılarak otoregresif hareketli ortalamalar modeli (ARMA) ekonometrik yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir Ampirik sonuçlar, Türkiye'de DİBS ikincil piyasa likıditesıyle işlem hacimleri arasında pozitif, oynaklık ile ise negatif ve anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Sonuç olarak, DİBS'lerin ikincil piyasadaki oynaklıkları ve işlem hacimleri likiditeleri için belirleyici bir rol oynamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, M. (2012). Liquidity analysis of government securities in the secondary market and recommendations for its improvement. BDDK Bankacılık ve Finansal Piyasalar Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 2, 113–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/144690

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. A Comparison of the Bid-Ask Spread in Corporate, Government and Municipal Bond Markets. Federal Reserve Bank of New York
  2. AKB - Asya Kalkınma Bankası, 2006. Asian Bond Monitor
  3. Altaş, Gökben. 2010. Açığa Satış. Sermaye Piyasasında Gündem. Cilt 101: sf. 8-22
  4. Arısoy, İbrahim. 2005. Türkiye'de Kamu Harcamaları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi
  5. Aydın, Ayşe Berfu. Piyasa Yapıcılığı Sistemi, Seçilmiş Ülke Örnekleri ve Türkiye Uygulaması. 2005. TCMB Piyasalar Genel Müdürlüğü Uzmanlık Tezi
  6. Bellas, Dimitri; Michael G. Papaioannou, and Iva Petrova. 2010. Determinants of Emerging Market Sovereign Bond Spreads: Fundamentals vs Financial Stres. IMF Working Paper
  7. BIS- Bank for International Settlements. 1999. Market Liquidity: Research Findings and Selected Policy Implications
  8. BIS- Bank for International Settlements. 2007. Financial Stability and Local Currency Bond Markets
  9. BIS-Bank for International Settlements. 1999. Market Liquidity: Research Findings and Selected Policy Implications. Committee on the Global Financial System Publications. 10.BIoomestein, Hans; Alison Harwood, Phillip Anderson ve Ceyla Pazarbasioglu. 2008. Secondary Market Liquidity in Domestic Debt Markets: Key Policy Conclusions. OECD, Financial Market Trends. 11.Bond market development indicators. 2006. Financial Sector Development Indicators
  10. Carlo Favero, Marco Pagano and Ernst-Ludwig von Thadden. 2005. Valutation, Liquidity and Risk in Government Bond Markets. Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research Working Paper Series
  11. Chabchitrchaidol, Akkharaphol ve Sakkapop Panyanukul. 2005. Key Determinants of Liquidity in the Thai Bond Market. BIS Quarterly Review. 14.Chakravarty, Sugato ve Asani Sarkar. 1999. Liquidity in U.S. Fixed Income Markets: A Comparison of the Bid-Ask Spread in Corporate, Government and Municipal Bond Markets. FRB of New York Staff Report. 15.Chordia, Tarun; Richard Roll ve Avanidhar Subrahmanyam. 2000. Commonality in Liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics. Cilt 56: 3-28
  12. Chordia, Tarun; Richard Roll ve Avanidhar Subrahmanyam. 2000. Market Liquidity and Trading Activity. 17.Chordia, Tarun; Sarkar, Asani; Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar. 2005, An Empirical Analysis of Stock and Bond Market Liquidity. The Review of Financial Studies. Cilt 18: sf. 85-129. 18.Cross, Graham Harry. 2002. Implications of e-trading in fixed income markets Journal of Bond Trading & Management. Cilt 1: 44-51. 19.Csavas, Csaba ve Erhart Szlizard. 2005. Are Hunga