SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review

Tez Yazımı İçin Bir Alanyazın Taraması Kılavuzu

Justus J. RANDOLPH
Faruk SEYİTOĞLU
Pages
251–264
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The article concludes with a discussion of common mistakes and a framework for the self-evaluation of a literature review.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Writing a faulty literature review is one of many ways to derail a dissertation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article summarizes some pivotal information on how to write a high-quality dissertation literature review.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The article concludes with a discussion of common mistakes and a framework for the self-evaluation of a literature review.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Writing a faulty literature review is one of many ways to derail a dissertation. This article summarizes some pivotal information on how to write a high-quality dissertation literature review. It begins with a discussion of the purposes of a review, presents taxonomy of literature reviews, and then discusses the steps in conducting a quantitative or qualitative literature review. The article concludes with a discussion of common mistakes and a framework for the self-evaluation of a literature review.

Özet

Kusurlu bir alanyazın çalışması, bir tezi rayından çıkarmanın yollarından biridir. Bu makale yüksek kalitede bir bilimsel tez alanyazınının nasıl yazılacağına dair bazı temel bilgileri özetlemektedir. Bu çalışma öncelikle alanyazın taramasının amaçlarını ve sınıflandırmasını belirterek sonrasında nicel ve nitel bir alanyazın incelemesinin yürütüldüğü adımları tartışmaktadır. Bu makale, yaygın hataların tartışılması ve bir alanyazın taramasının öz-değerlendirmesini içeren çerçeve ile son bulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

RANDOLPH, J. J., SEYİTOĞLU, F. (2018). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 251–264. https://ajindex.com/articles/144592

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Alton-Lee, A. (1998). A Troubleshooter’s Checklist for Prospective Authors derived from Reviewers’ Critical Feedback, Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(8): 887-890. American Education Research Association. (2006). Standards for Reporting on Empirical Social Science Research in AERA Publications, Educational Researcher, 35(6): 33-40.
  2. Boote, D. N. ve Beile, P. (2004). The Quality of Dissertation Literature Reviews: A Missing Link in Research Preparation American Educational Research Association. USA: San Diego. Boote, D. N. ve Beile, P. (2005). Scholars Before Researchers: On the Centrality of the Dissertation Literature Review in Research Preparation, Educational Researcher, 34(6): 3-15.
  3. Cooper, H. M. (1984). The Integrative Research Review: A Systematic Approach Applied Social Research Methods Series. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing Knowledge Synthesis: A Taxonomy of Literature Reviews, Knowledge in Society, 1: 104-126.
  4. Cooper, H. ve Hedges, L. V. (1994a). The Handbook of Research Synthesis. H. Cooper ve L.V. Hedges (Editörler). New York: Sage. Cooper, H. ve Hedges, L. V. (1994b). Research Synthesis as a Scientific Enterprise. İçinde H. Cooper ve L.V. Hedges (Editörler), The Handbook of Research Synthesis (ss. 3-14). New York: Sage. Educational Resources Information Center. (1982). ERIC Processing Manual (Section 5: Cataloging). Washington DC. Hart, C. (1998). Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Londra: Sage. Gall, M. D., Borg, W. R. ve Gall, J. P. (1996). Education Research: An Introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. ve Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-Analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Grant, C. A. ve Graue, E. (1999). Reviewing a Review: A Case History of the “Review of Educational Research”, Review of Educational Research, 69(4): 384-396.
  5. LeCompte, M. D., Klinger, J. K., Campbell S. A. ve Menke, D. W. (2003). Editor’s Introduction, Review of Educational Research, 73(2): 123-124.
  6. Light, R. J. ve Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Üniversitesi.
  7. Lipsey, M. W. ve Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis Applied Social Research Methods Series (49. Baskı). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mullins, G. ve Kiley, M. (2002). It’s a PhD, not a Nobel Prize: How Experienced Examiners Assess Research Theses, Studies in Higher