SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Supraglottik Larenjektomiden İyileşen Hastaların Cepstral Pik Nokta Analizleri

Cepstral Peak Point Analyses of Patients Recovering from Supraglottic Laryngectomy

Ziya SALTÜRK
Onur ÜSTÜN
Hüseyin SARI
Belgin TUTAR
Tolgar Lütfi KUMRAL
Güler BERKİTEN
Yavuz UYAR
Pages
49–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sonuç: Supraglottik larenjektomi, kepstral pik noktasını düşürürken, ses kalitesini düşürerek mukozal dalgaları etkiler

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, supraglottik larenjektomi geçiren hastalarda kepstral pik noktası ve laringostroboskopik sonuçları incelemektir.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Yöntem: Transservikal supraglottik larenjektomi ve bilateral modifiye boyun diseksiyonu olmuş, en az 12 ay takip edilmiş 10 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sonuç: Supraglottik larenjektomi, kepstral pik noktasını düşürürken, ses kalitesini düşürerek mukozal dalgaları etkiler
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:10 hasta
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, supraglottik larenjektomi geçiren hastalarda kepstral pik noktası ve laringostroboskopik sonuçları incelemektir. Yöntem: Transservikal supraglottik larenjektomi ve bilateral modifiye boyun diseksiyonu olmuş, en az 12 ay takip edilmiş 10 hasta çalışmaya dahil edildi. Bütün hastalar çalışmanın başlangıcında laringostroboskopiyle incelendi; glottik kapanış ve mukozal dalga paternleri incelendi. Temel frekanslarda ses kayıtları alındı ve kepstral pik noktası analiz edildi. Voice handicap index-10 tamamlanması istendi. On sağlıklı bireyden kontrol grubu oluşturuldu. Sonuçlar karşılaştırıldı. Bulgular: Supraglottik larenjektomi grubunda ortalama kepstral pik noktası 1,53-5,91, kontrol grubunda ise 4,6-6,06 olarak bulundu, sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu. Supraglottik larenjektomi grubunda temel frekans 174,49 ile 197,25 Hz arasında, kontrol grubunda ise 118,57 ile 197,61 Hz arasında değişmiştir ve sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Laringostroboskopik incelemede glottik kapanışta iki grup arasında anlamlı fark bulunmazken, mukozal dalgalarda anlamlı fark saptandı. Voice handicap index, supraglottik larenjektomi hastalarında anlamlı olarak daha düşük bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Supraglottik larenjektomi, kepstral pik noktasını düşürürken, ses kalitesini düşürerek mukozal dalgaları etkiler

Özet

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate smoothed cepstral peak point and laryngostrobosopic results in patients who underwent supraglottic laryngectomy. Method: Ten patients who underwent transcervical supraglottic laryngectomy with bilateral modified radical neck dissection, and who completed at least 12 months of follow-up, were included. All patients underwent laryngostroboscopic evaluation at study commencement; glottal closure and mucosal wave pattern were examined. Voice records were taken at fundamental frequency and smoothed cepstral peak point were analysed. Voice handicap index-10 was requested to be completed. Ten healthy individual constituted control group. Results were compared. Results: The mean smoothed cepstral peak points were 1.53-5.91 in the supraglottic laryngectomy group and 4.6-6.06 in controls, a significant difference. The fundamental frequency ranged from 174.49 to 197.25 Hz in the supraglottic laryngectomy group and from 118.57 to 197.61 Hz in the control group, also a significant difference. Laryngostroboscopic evaluation revealed no significant between-group differences in closure, but the mucosal waves differed significantly. Voice handicap index was significantly lower in supraglottic laryngectomy patients. Conclusion: Supraglottic laryngectomy reduces smoothed cepstral peak point and affects the mucosal wave, reducing voice quality

🔖

Cite This Article

SALTÜRK, Z., ÜSTÜN, O., SARI, H., TUTAR, B., KUMRAL, T. L., BERKİTEN, G., UYAR, Y. (2019). Supraglottik Larenjektomiden İyileşen Hastaların Cepstral Pik Nokta Analizleri. Bağcılar Tıp Bülteni, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 49–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/144487

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. M.H. Hast. Applied embryology of the larynx, In: P.W. Alberti, D.P. (Eds). Centennial Conference on Laryngeal Carcinoma. AppletonCentury-Croft, New York, 1976, pp. 6-10
  2. J.J. Pressmann, M.B. Simon, C. Monell, Anatomical studies related to dissemination of cancer of the larynx, Trans Am Acad Opthalmol Otolaryngol 1960;64:628-638
  3. Prades JM, Simon PG, Timoshenko AP, Dumollard JM, Schmitt T, Martin C. Extended and standard supraglottic laryngectomies: a review of 110 patients, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2005;262:947- 952
  4. Stager S. The role of the supraglottic area in voice production. Otolaryngol Cur Res 2012;2:1-7
  5. Topaloğlu I, Salturk Z, Atar Y, Berkiten G, Büyükkoç O, Çakır O. Evaluation of voice quality following supraglottic laryngectomy. Otolaryngology head and Neck Surg 2014;151:1003-1007
  6. Hillenbrand J, Cleveland RA, Erikson RL. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. J Speech Hear Res 1997;34:769-778
  7. Hillenbrand J, Houde RA. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality dysphonic voices and continuous speech. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:311-321
  8. Heman-Ackah YD, Sataloff RT, Laureyns G, Lurie D, Michael DD, et al. Heuer r quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure. J Voice 2014;28:783-788
  9. Flaire R, Godino-Llorente RI. Cepstral peak prominence: a comprehensive analysis. http://oa.upm.es/35802/1/INVE_ MEM_2014_190250.pdf
  10. Stone D, McCabe P, Palme CE, Heard R, Eastwood C, Riffat F et al. Voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer-considering signal type and smoothed cepstral peak prominence. J Voice 2015;29:370-381
  11. Makeieff M, Barbotte E, Giovanni A, Guerrier B. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurements of speech production after supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Laryngoscope 2005;115:546- 551
  12. Behrman A, Dahl LD, Abramson AL, Schutte HK. Anterior-posterior and medial compression of the supraglottis: signs of nonorganic dysphonia or normal postures? J Voice 2003;17:403-410
  13. Titze IR. Acoustic interpretation of resonant voice. J Voice 2001;15:519-528
  14. Titze IR, Story BH. Acoustic interactions of the voice source with the lower vocal tract. J Acoust Soc Am 1997;101:2234-2243
  15. Titze IR. A theoretica. J Voice. 2004;18:292-298
  16. Knapp RG, Miller MC, Describing the performance of a diagnostic test, In: R.G. Knapp, M.C. Miller MC (Eds) Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Harwal Publishing Company. Malvern PA, 1992, pp. 31-52
  17. Peretti G, Piazza C, Cattaneo