SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Study of Man in the Light of a Systems Approach Man and Natural Science

Fikrat Afandiyev(BAKÜ DEVLET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8529-8034
Islam İslamov(BAKU STATE UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7840-0344
Pages
1950–1956
Publication Date
2024-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In doing so, it identifies a new path open to humanity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Currently, the development of scientific knowledge and practice highlights the need to connect research problems with human issues.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The presence of internal integral trends in the development of knowledge and interdisciplinary research has a significant impact on the development of scientific knowledge, connecting it with the individual's research tasks and cognitive abilities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In doing so, it identifies a new path open to humanity.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Human · natural science · system

Abstract

Currently, the development of scientific knowledge and practice highlights the need to connect research problems with human issues. The presence of internal integral trends in the development of knowledge and interdisciplinary research has a significant impact on the development of scientific knowledge, connecting it with the individual's research tasks and cognitive abilities. The complex, systemic nature and internal connections of humans present humans as subjects of natural science. This perspective is a natural outcome based on deep practical, methodological, and ideological foundations. For the humanities, the artistic understanding of humans has always been a direct subject of study. For the natural sciences, this focus began only in the second half of the twentieth century. This article, therefore, attempts to study some ideological and methodological prerequisites for the reorientation of the cognitive strategy of natural science. In doing so, it identifies a new path open to humanity.

Özet

Currently, the development of scientific knowledge and practice highlights the need to connect research problems with human issues. The presence of internal integral trends in the development of knowledge and interdisciplinary research has a significant impact on the development of scientific knowledge, connecting it with the individual's research tasks and cognitive abilities. The complex, systemic nature and internal connections of humans present humans as subjects of natural science. This perspective is a natural outcome based on deep practical, methodological, and ideological foundations. For the humanities, the artistic understanding of humans has always been a direct subject of study. For the natural sciences, this focus began only in the second half of the twentieth century. This article, therefore, attempts to study some ideological and methodological prerequisites for the reorientation of the cognitive strategy of natural science. In doing so, it identifies a new path open to humanity.

🔖

Cite This Article

Afandiyev, F., İslamov, I. (2024). Study of Man in the Light of a Systems Approach Man and Natural Science. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3, 1950–1956. https://ajindex.com/articles/1444283

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Agayeva, K., & Abbasli, V. (2023). Suleyman Rahimov’s Role in the Development of Libraries in the 20th Century. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 10 (6), 2158-2165.
  2. Hegel, G. W. F. (2014). Science of logic. Routledge.
  3. Ismayilov, N., & Khudiyeva, V. (2022). Assessment of digital knowledge and research skills and overview of on going work at the national level, forecasting. Concepts of digitization. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 35, 593-600.
  4. Ismayılov, N., & Khudiyeva, V. (2023). Conducting training and research, problem solving, creative thinking. Akademik Tarih ve Düşünce Dergisi, 10 (2), 643-649.
  5. Ismaylo N., Mukhamadli D. i Khudíêva V. (2022). Sposob registratsii i registratsii. Naukovo-teoreticheskiy al'manakh Graní, 25 (5), 31-34.
  6. Lebedeva, S.A. (2006). Philosophy of natural sciences. Mir.
  7. Los', V. A. (1986). Global Problems as the Subject of Multidisciplinary Scientific Research (some results from the study of the Global Processes of World Development). Soviet Studies in Philosophy, 25 (2), 4-30. Marx, K., Engel, F. Soch., T.Z, p. Z; T.26, p.115, T.42, 124-125.
  8. Oldfield, J. D., & Shaw, D. J. (2006). VI Vernadsky and the noosphere concept: Russian understandings of society–nature interaction. Geoforum, 37 (1), 145-154.
  9. Ruzavin, G. I. (2013). Kontseptsiya. Izdatel'stvo Prospekt.
  10. Simpson Dis.G. (1979). New sky, New Earth, new man. Nature, N5.
  11. Vernadsky, V.I. (1974). Evolution of the biosphere. Science and Life, 3, 40-44.