SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics / 2018 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Mechanical performance comparison of glass and mono fibers added gypsum composites

SADIK ALPER YILDIZEL
SERDAR ÇARBAŞ
Pages
9–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was obtained that flexural and shrinkage behavior of the composite were enhanced with the addition of MPF compared to GF added mixes; however, compressive strength values were not as high as GF reinforced composites.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Gypsum and gypsum based composite are widely preferred in construction industry for various purposes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mechanical performances of gypsum composite have been en-hanced by researchers in order to increase its area of usage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was obtained that flexural and shrinkage behavior of the composite were enhanced with the addition of MPF compared to GF added mixes; however, compressive strength values were not as high as GF reinforced composites.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Gypsum and gypsum based composite are widely preferred in construction industry for various purposes. Mechanical performances of gypsum composite have been en-hanced by researchers in order to increase its area of usage. In this research, gypsum composites containing expanded glass were reinforced by glass fibers (GF) and mono polypropylene fibers (MPF). GF and MPF were used up to 1.5%. The flexural strength, compressive strength, and shrinkage behavior of the composites were examined within the scope of this study. 50 x 50 x 50 mm and 40 x 40 x 160 sized specimens were prepared for the mechanical performance tests. It was obtained that flexural and shrinkage behavior of the composite were enhanced with the addition of MPF compared to GF added mixes; however, compressive strength values were not as high as GF reinforced composites.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZEL, S. A., ÇARBAŞ, S. (2018). Mechanical performance comparison of glass and mono fibers added gypsum composites. Challenge Journal of Structural Mechanics, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 9–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/144387

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Çolak A (2006). Physical and mechanical properties of polymer-plaster composites. Materials Letters, 60(16), 1977-1982.
  2. Eve S, Gomina M, Gmouh A, Samdi A, Moussa R, Orange G (2002). Microstructural and mechanical behaviour of polyamide fibre-reinforced plaster composites. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 22(13), 2269-2275.
  3. Gazineu MHP, Dos Santos VA, Hazin CA, De Vasconcelos WE, Dantas CC (2011). Production of polymer-plaster composite by gamma irradiation. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 53(8), 1140-1144.
  4. Heim D, Clarke JA (2004). Numerical modelling and thermal simulation of PCM–gypsum composites with ESP-r. Energy and Buildings, 36(8), 795-805.
  5. Li M, Wu Z, Chen M (2011). Preparation and properties of gypsumbased heat storage and preservation material. Energy and Buildings, 43(9), 2314-2319.
  6. Martias C, Joliff Y, Favotto C (2014). Effects of the addition of glass fibers, mica and vermiculite on the mechanical properties of a gypsum- based composite at room temperature and during a fire test. Composites Part B: Engineering, 62, 37-53.
  7. Medina NF, Barbero-Barrera MM (2017). Mechanical and physical enhancement of gypsum composites through a synergic work of polypropylene fiber and recycled isostatic graphite filler. Construction and Building Materials, 131, 165-177.
  8. Tazawa EI (1998). Effect of self-stress on flexural strength of gypsumpolymer composites. Advanced Cement Based Materials, 7(1), 1-7. TS EN 13279-1 (2014). Gypsum binders and gypsum plasters–Part, 1. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara. TS EN 13279-2 (2015). Gypsum Binders and Gypsum Plasters–Part, 2. Turkish Standards Institute, Ankara.
  9. Vimmrova A, Keppert M, Svoboda L, Černý R (2011). Lightweight gypsum composites: Design strategies for multi-functionality. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33(1), 84-89.
  10. Wu YF (2004). The effect of longitudinal reinforcement on the cyclic shear behavior of glass fiber reinforced gypsum wall panels: tests. Engineering Structures, 26(11), 1633-1646.
  11. Wu YF, Dare MP (2006). Flexural and shear strength of composite lintels in glass-fiber-reinforced gypsum wall constructions. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 18(3), 415-423.
  12. Yu QL, Brouwers HJH (2012). Development of a self-compacting gypsum- based lightweight composite. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34(9), 1033-1043.
  13. Zhao K, Zhang X, Wei TJ (2008). Full-scale model test on the performance of a five-storey fiber plaster board building. In: Proceedings of the seventh international RILEM symposium fiber rei